Washington Wizards forward Justin Champagnie played well in the team’s blowout loss to the Chicago Bulls. | Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images
Stats, analysis, commentary
With a “must lose” game on the schedule, the
Washington Wizards took the court against the Chicago Bulls with only eight players available, the oldest and most experienced of whom was 23-year-old Justin Champagnie.
Champagnie entered the game with just 1,813 career minutes spread over four seasons — with 1,263 coming this season. He was on a two-way contract until about a month ago.
Washington’s starting lineup consisted of:
- Bub Carrington — 19 years old
- AJ Johnson — 20 years old
- Alex Sarr — 19 years old
- Justin Champagnie — 23 years old
- Kyshawn George — 21 years old
By the way, Champagnie was the oldest player available for the Wizards last night — their bench consisted of Colby Jones (22), JT Thor (22), and Tristan Vukcevic (22). For those not keeping score at home, Washington’s average age against the Bulls was 21-years-old.
The Bulls — who began the night with an outside chance of moving from ninth to eighth in the Eastern Conference standings — deployed a more veteran lineup that included Nikola Vucevic, Coby White, and Kevin Huerter. As would be expected, Chicago rolled to a comfortable 30-point victory, even though the outcome became meaningless before the final buzzer.
The Eastern Conference playoffs picture is locked. Chicago face the Miami Heat in the 9-10 play-in game, the winner of which will face the loser of the Orlando Magic vs.
Atlanta Hawks 7-8 contest.
Bright Spots and Observations
- Justin Champagnie played another good game — 22 points on 15 shots, 14 rebounds, 3 steals. He committed three turnovers, which dragged down his overall offensive efficiency, but it was still a good night overall.
- Bub Carrington was decent — 18 points, 5 rebounds, 11 assists. His shooting was okay (7-15 from the floor; 2-6 from three), but four turnovers pushed his offensive rating to a subpar 106 (-8.6 relative to league average).
- Tristan Vukcevic made a few shots, which was nice. His defense and rebounding was largely absent — just 3 boards in 26 minutes for the big man.
- Kyshawn George was okay in his 24 minutes. He was the only Wizards player with an offensive rating (points produced per possession x 100) above league average. He left the game early after turning his ankle.
- Washington’s 88 offensive rating was their fourth worst offensive performance of the season.
- The Wizards are now guaranteed one of the two worst records in the league.
- Chicago won by 30 despite shooting just 31.7% from three.
For some reason, we watched the Monumental broadcast on Playback last night. It was as bad as I remembered. For anyone who might be wondering, yes Drew Gooden’s “stat” that Vukcevic entered the night scoring 1.3 points ever two minutes this season was bizarre and meaningless.
The Wizards close out their season Sunday afternoon against the Miami Heat.
Four Factors
Below are the four factors that decide wins and losses in basketball — shooting (efg), rebounding (offensive rebounds), ball handling (turnovers), fouling (free throws made).
The four factors are measured by:
- eFG% (effective field goal percentage, which accounts for the three-point shot)
- OREB% (offensive rebound percentage)
- TOV% (turnover percentage — turnovers divided by possessions)
- FTM/FGA (free throws made divided by field goal attempts)
In the table below are the four factors using the percentages and rates traditionally presented. There’s also a column showing league average in each of the categories to give a sense of each team’s performance relative to the rest of the league this season.
Stats & Metrics
Below are a few performance metrics. PPA is my overall production metric, which credits players for things they do that help a team win (scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defending) and dings them for things that hurt (missed shots, turnovers, bad defense, fouls).
PPA is a per possession metric designed for larger data sets. In small sample sizes, the numbers can get weird. In PPA, 100 is average, higher is better and replacement level is 45. For a single game, replacement level isn’t much use, and I reiterate the caution about small samples sometimes producing weird results.
POSS is the number of possessions each player was on the floor in this game.
ORTG = offensive rating, which is points produced per individual possessions x 100. League average last season was 114.8. Points produced is not the same as points scored. It includes the value of assists and offensive rebounds, as well as sharing credit when receiving an assist.
USG = offensive usage rate. Average is 20%.
ORTG and USG are versions of stats created by former Wizards assistant coach Dean Oliver and modified by me. ORTG is an efficiency measure that accounts for the value of shooting, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers. USG includes shooting from the floor and free throw line, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers.
+PTS = “Plus Points” is a measure of the points gained or lost by each player based on their efficiency in this game compared to league average efficiency on the same number of possessions. A player with an offensive rating (points produced per possession x 100) of 100 who uses 20 possessions would produce 20 points. If the league average efficiency is 114, the league — on average — would produced 22.8 points in the same 20 possessions. So, the player in this hypothetical would have a +PTS score of -2.8.
Players are sorted by total production in the game.
