News Canucks Team Notes

Instant Reaction: Special teams the big story in Canucks’ 3-2 OT loss to Bruins

Welcome back to Instant Reaction, the series here at CanucksArmy where we give you our instant reaction to tonight’s Vancouver Canucks game and ask our readers to do the same in the comments section below!

Starting lineup​

Warmup #Canucks lines vs. @NHLBruins

Kane. Sasson. Boeser.
DeBrusk. EP40. Karlsson.
O’Connor. Kämpf. Sherwood.
Öhgren. Räty. Höglander.

MP29. Willander.
Buium. Hronek.
EP25. Myers.

🥅Lankinen🥅

7pm on @Sportsnet650 https://t.co/J6DNM1E8Qt pic.twitter.com/UmRbEhHwoO

— Brendan Batchelor (@BatchHockey) January 4, 2026

Minor lineup changes for tonight’s contest. The forward group remains intact from Friday night’s loss to the Seattle Kraken, but Elias Pettersson comes in on the blueline for PO Joseph. Kevin Lankinen gets the nod.

First period​


Tom Willander brought Canucks fans to their feet – and not in a good way, in a near-goal against. With Morgan Geekie pressuring him, Willander lost control of the puck, allowing Geekie to steal the puck and ring it off the far side post. David Pastrnak followed that up with a threatening chance of his own, after sneaking behind Filip Hronek and Zeev Buium and was all alone on a breakaway. Unfortunately for Pastrnak, breakaways are just in-game shootout attempts. So you knew Lankinen was going to stop it:

Kevin Lankinen stops Pastrnak on the breakaway!

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/vuMI6ipzWC

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

There was a stretch of about five minutes in the middle of the period where we went without a whistle. And there was no action. It was a lot of going back and forth, dumping the puck in, changing, heading up ice, dumping the puck in, changing, etc. There was one solid chance, however, when Elias Pettersson took the puck off the boards, spun around a defender to collect it, and then ripped a shot off Jeremy Swayman’s right pad.

Later in the period, Marcus Pettersson got his stick up on Pastrnak. To which we had to witness the most boring minute of hockey, with the Bruins gaining the zone on the delayed penalty, only to misplay the puck and clear the zone themselves. This happened at least three times. But I guess it worked? Because the same Pettersson tripped Pavel Zacha as he entered the zone. Four-minute power play for the Bruins, with one of the Canucks’ best penalty killers in the box. And Boston capitalized.

Hometown kid Fraser Minten, playing his first NHL game in Vancouver, accepts the puck in the bumper, and has time to collect it, spin into a better shooting position and wire one past Lankinen.

Fraser Minten makes it 1-0 Boston on the Power Play.

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/8w8zDxg2t0

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

1-0 Bruins.

The rest of the Bruins’ power play was short-lived after Kiefer Sherwood drew a retaliatory slash from Viktor Arvidsson following a hit. Bruins lead heading into the break.

First period takeaways:

– Lankinen needs to work on his rebound control. It’s been an issue this season, resulting in multiple goals against, and it nearly happened again in the first. Viktor Arvidsson shot it off the right pad of Lankinen, which left the juicy rebound hanging out in the slot. Luckily, Max Sasson was there to save the day and check Charlie McAvoy out of the way. But that’s something that has been costing Lankinen, and something he needs to clean up.

– Didn’t think it was a banner period for young Tom Willander.

Second period​


The Canucks waste no time getting their first tally of the game. Filip Hronek fires a pass from the point to the net front that hits Pettersson’s skate and goes through Swayman’s five-hole. The Bruins’ netminder would cause a fuss about the goal against, but to no avail. Tie game.

🚨Canucks Goal🚨

Pettersson gets his 10th of the year, and the Canucks tie the game at 1!

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/3nPVSBAR9M

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

1-1 tie.

Following the goal, both teams would trade penalties. Familiar face and most penalized player in the league, Nikita Zadorov, dumped Aatu Räty to the ice with a cross-check, sending the Canucks to their first full power play of the game. Willander got another shot as the quarterback of the top unit, but no dice. Then, Max Sasson dumps Casey Mittlestadt along the boards. But another familiar face, Elias Lindholm, would make the Canucks pay.

Pastrnak walks down the left wall, maintains a threatening positioning, leaving Lankinen unsure of whether he will pass or shoot, and threads the needle to Lindholm to get enough of it to re-direct it behind the Canucks goaltender and give the Bruins back their lead.

It's another Power Play goal for the Bruins as they retake the lead.

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/ljgHVILNHc

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

2-1 Bruins.

Zadorov’s former Canuck was showing, as he sent his former club back to the man advantage after a puck-over-the-glass penalty. Willander remained the defenceman on the top unit and had a hilarious snap hook one-time shot that somehow went in the corner. But later in the power play, Pettersson set him up for redemption. He claps a one-timer off the pad of Swayman, leaving DeBrusk with a wide-open net. Swayman robs his former teammate.

DeBrusk gets robbed by Swayman.

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/8umqn6PBTX

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

The Canucks were gifted yet another power play, and they finally converted on their fifth opportunity. Buium found a streaming Filip Hronek down the right wall. He tried to feed a pass to Linus Karlsson at the net front, but it went off Charlie McAvoy’s skate and behind Swayman to equalize the match. Sometimes you’ve got to be lucky to be good.

🚨Canucks goal🚨

Hronek banks it off McAvoy to tie the game at 2!

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/1vdsDGdZ6t

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

2-2 tie.

And that was the period.

Second period takeaways:

– This has been a boring game. The Bruins had the old LA Kings approach, where they wouldn’t pressure the puck carrier; instead, they sat back and clogged up the neutral zone. And the Canucks just couldn’t get anything through, which was a huge result of them having just 10 shots on goal at 5v5 through the first 40 minutes of the game

– The DeBrusk-Pettersson-Karlsson line has yet to be on the ice for a 5v5 shot attempt against through 40 minutes. That’s bonkers.

Third period​


Another period of this game, another Canucks power play opportunity. But, as most of the Canucks’ power plays on the night, nothing too exciting happened.

Halfway through the final period, the shots were 10-4 for the Canucks, indicating they were far outplaying their opponent. However, there wasn’t a single standout chance for the Canucks. They were all fairly non-threatening, especially given how calm and locked in Swayman looked. Sure, he allowed two goals, but both of them were lucky deflections. The Canucks have yet to beat him cleanly.

The Canucks’ best chance of the period came toward the tail end, when Karlsson sprung Pettersson down the left-side boards. Pettersson protected the puck with his body to get around the Bruins defender, flipped the puck to his backhand as he skated through the top of Swayman’s crease, but ran out of room, and his backhand shot attempt hit the side of the net.

The Bruins had chances of their own, but both teams were comfortable with the scoreless third period and took their loser point into overtime.

Overtime​


Räty’s bad night on the draws continued, as he lost the opening faceoff and the Bruins went on the attack. Scoring threat Morgan Geekie walked in and nearly ended it on the first shot, but rang it off his second post of the game.

Pastrnak wiffed on a one-time shot, which sent Liam Öhgren on a partial breakaway in overtime. McAvoy was draped all over him, so he had to focus on winning the race for the puck. However, had he stopped up and realized his surroundings, he could have found Buium for a chance.

But as the game started, hometown hero Fraser Minten buried the game-winner with 19 seconds remaining in overtime.

Fraser Minten wins it for the Bruins in Overtime.

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/LVMIaDYG6R

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

3-2 Bruins Final.

Full game takeaways:

– This game kind of felt like the hockey gods getting a bit of retribution for the Bruins after they dominated the Canucks in TD Garden but walked away with the loss. A similar outcome to this one, but the Canucks were on the losing end of this one.

– Special teams were the big losing factor for the Canucks in this one. They only capitalized once on their six power play opportunities, while they only killed one of the three penalties they took. Faceoffs were another massive loss, as they won just 32.8% of the draws tonight. None of the Canucks’ four centres finished with a faceoff winning percentage above 42% tonight.

– Evander Kane did not play the final 9:39 minutes of the third period and did not get a shift in the extra frame. There was no mention of an injury, so if this was a benching, Kane might be next on the list of veteran forwards who need to sit out a game.

What’s your instant reaction to tonight’s game? Let us know in the comments section below!

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/instan...y-vancouver-canucks-3-2-ot-loss-boston-bruins
 
3 Canucks Stars of the Week: Linus Karlsson’s three-point week leads the charge into 2026

Welcome back to Stars of the Week at CanucksArmy! Every week, we’ll be bringing you our Top Three best and brightest performers on the Vancouver Canucks that week. Disagree with our picks or have your own stars to nominate? Let us know in the comments below!

Welcome to 2026! It’s a new calendar year, and the Vancouver Canucks are in 31st place in the 32-team National Hockey League. This is an improvement on last week. We have learned over that time frame that the Canucks are not losing; they are consolation-prize winners. Out of an available eight points through four games, Vancouver picked up half of those with a 1-1-2 record. If we’re going by college rules, 50% is still a pass.

There were a handful of feel-good storylines this week for the team, namely, Jake DeBrusk shaking off an offensive drought with a three-point game after being healthy scratched, or Kevin Lankinen bagging yet another shootout win, for example. Ultimately, these storylines don’t amount to anything exciting when missing the playoffs is already a foregone conclusion. It is, however, a welcome change to the general influx of feel-bad stories that have afflicted the Canucks in recent years.

Linus Karlsson​


Linus Karlsson’s entire season is one of the aforementioned feel-good storylines. Six years after his signing rights were first acquired in possibly the only Jim Benning move that has aged well, Karlsson has won a Calder Cup in Abbotsford and become a full-fledged NHL regular all in the same calendar year.

Signing contracts & scoring goals. 🤌
Big day for Linus Karlsson. pic.twitter.com/SZCEDb0bpN

— Vancouver Canucks (@Canucks) January 3, 2026

Karlsson had three points this week and has been excelling on the wing alongside his countryman, Elias Pettersson, especially in the overtime loss to the Bruins, where their line dominated. Karlsson is intuitive at playmaking but also isn’t afraid to zero in at the net front, aspects of his game that have made him a valuable asset. An exact valuation of $2.25 million AAV, actually, after Karlsson signed a two-year contract extension this week.

Filip Hronek​


Following Quinn Hughes’ departure from Vancouver, his former defence partner Filip Hronek has been sucked into the ex-captain’s ridiculous ice-time power vacuum that remained. Hronek has topped all skaters in ice time this week, even playing just over 30 minutes against the Canucks overtime loss against the Boston Bruins. He’s been paired with rookie Zeev Buium a handful of times, who’s been stepping into his predecessor’s skates in more ways than one, and they’ve been formidable in all zones on the ice. Hronek is truly capable of playing on any pairing. For a man of few words and even fewer media engagements, Hronek is an indispensable leader for the Canucks blue line at this point.

A power play goal against Boston complemented Hronek’s three-point week on Saturday night. Back in my day, Hronek’s shot on the power play was as feared as a raptor in Jurassic Park. The team may be down, but Hronek certainly is not.

🚨Canucks goal🚨

Hronek banks it off McAvoy to tie the game at 2!

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/1vdsDGdZ6t

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

Elias Pettersson​


Since returning from injury last week, Elias Pettersson has been consistent with the Canucks, and was named to Sweden’s Olympic roster. Have yourself a week, EP40.

Pettersson is the glue of the newfangled, shiny, and successful DeBrusk – Pettersson – Karlsson top line, like the one Beatle who kept the band together through the band’s worst strife – it’s up to you to determine which Beatle that is.

🚨Canucks Goal🚨

Pettersson gets his 10th of the year, and the Canucks tie the game at 1!

🎥 Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/3nPVSBAR9M

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 4, 2026

Pettersson has been defensively solid, relative to the rest of the roster at least – but the defensive side of Pettersson’s two-way centre capabilities has rarely been the part of his game in question. Luckily, the offence has been there as well, with two goals and an assist this week. He’s been back taking faceoffs, although the Canucks have collectively struggled in that respect, and the only game in which they had the edge in the dot was their shootout loss against the Seattle Kraken. This was also Pettersson’s most successful night, in that respect, with a 61.5% win percentage in 13 faceoffs, tied only with David Kämpf.

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/3-vanc...-karlssons-three-point-week-leads-charge-2026
 
Letter grades for each Canuck at the midway point of the season

We have officially hit the mid-way point of the 2025-26 Vancouver Canucks season, following Saturday night’s 3-2 overtime loss to the Boston Bruins. And it hasn’t necessarily gone as fans, management, or the players had hoped.

At the time of this writing, the Canucks sit 31st in the NHL standings, three points ahead of the last-place Winnipeg Jets. Coming into the season, the strengths of this team were looked at to be team defence and goaltending. At the halfway point, they’ve allowed the fourth most goals against in the league.

This season was supposed to be about winning to keep their captain, Quinn Hughes. But that didn’t go as planned; he was shipped out in mid-December. Elias Pettersson was supposed to have a massive bounce-back and prove he’s worth the hefty price tag, but he’s on pace for just 22 goals and 56 points. The injury bug has hit nearly everybody on the roster, and

Everything that could have gone wrong, did. That being said, there have been a few bright spots this season. Let’s get into the letter grades at the halfway point of the season.

Criteria: players must have played at least 50% of the Canucks’ games. David Kämpf, Lukas Reichel, PO Joseph, MacKenzie MacEachern, Nils Höglander, Jonathan Lekkerimäki, Filip Chytil, Victor Mancini, Braeden Cootes, Derek Forbort, Teddy Blueger, Nils Aman, Joe LaBate, as well as newcomers Zeev Buium, Marco Rossi and Liam Öhgren, will not be graded.

Forwards​

Elias Pettersson – C+

Offensively, Pettersson’s grade should be lower. Sure, he leads the team in points with 25 through 33 games. But that’s just not good enough for the $11.6 million man. His pace of 56 points – 62 for an 82-game pace – is that of a second liner. Not a premier player, as he’s paid to be. His rating gets a boost to a C+ because of his stellar defensive play this season.

Conor Garland – B-

Garland has been okay this season. He’s on his usual 45-50-point pace as he has been every year since coming to Vancouver. It’s just been a bit of a struggle to stay on the ice for Garland, as he has battled through numerous little injuries that have held him out of the lineup. He has seven goals and 22 points through 33 games at the halfway point. He deserves a higher grade than most of the other struggling offensive forwards on this team because, despite his smaller frame, Garland finds ways to stay relevant when the puck isn’t going in for him, as he did when he fought Jared McCann earlier last week.

Kiefer Sherwood – A+

Was there any doubt that Sherwood would receive the highest grade? In many games this season, he’s been the only Canucks player going, singlehandedly dragging his team into the fight of the game. Sherwood is not only the emotional leader with his hard work, physicality and passion on the ice, but he’s their goal-scoring leader, with 17 already this season. It’s a shame he will likely be moved, because he is a heart-and-soul player that teams typically want to keep around.

Jake DeBrusk – C

Had it not been for his resurgence after his healthy scratching, DeBrusk’s ranking could have been lower. However, he’s got the benefit of recency bias, coming off a seven-shot outing in which he was not on the ice for a 5v5 shot attempt against, and a three-point night the game before that. But the glaring issue with DeBrusk is that he has only one 5v5 goal halfway through the season. That’s just not gonna cut it. If he continues to play this way through, especially with Pettersson and Karlsson, that should change.

Evander Kane – C-

I’m sure most fans will want this rating to be lower. Has he been less physical than expected? Yes. Does he take some questionable penalties and have some effort issues on backchecks? Absolutely. But that was kind of how he was advertised before coming to Vancouver. He has six goals and 19 points through 40 games this season, which is kind of disappointing given his deployment. Canucks management probably has some buyer’s remorse after this offseason move.

Brock Boeser – C

The talk surrounding the Canucks struggles of late has been that their offensive forwards have not been pulling their weight. That starts and ends with Brock Boeser. Through the first month and a bit of the season (18 games), Boeser had eight goals and 14 points. However, Boeser has just one goal over his last 23 games, and zero in 16. In fairness to Boeser, he’s mostly been playing with Lukas Reichel and David Kämpf as his centreman. Regardless, he knows he needs to be better, especially as a leader for this group and would likely agree with a C letter grade.

Linus Karlsson – A

It took him a bit to get into the Canucks lineup, but once he did, Karlsson hasn’t looked back. He’s continued to produce, despite playing in a bottom-six role for most of the season. He’s now up to 10 goals (tied for second on the team) and 18 points through 38 games. Karlsson’s efforts have earned him top-line and PP2 deployment, as well as a healthy raise to $2.25 million annually. For a guy who wasn’t expected to make a massive impact at the NHL level, he has blown expectations out of the water and turned himself into an everyday NHLer and is worthy of an A letter grade.

Drew O’Connor – B+

Like Karlsson, O’Connor gets a high letter grade because of his impact relative to expectation. O’Connor has been available for all 41 games this season, has scored 10 goals and 16 points and is one of the only Canucks to have a positive plus-minus rating. He has been trusted in more offensive situations, and it has paid off: O’Connor is on pace for a career year in the goal department, projected to hit 20 goals for the first time in his career.

Aatu Räty – C+

Speaking of another player with a positive plus-minus rating, we have Aatu Räty. If you ask Adam Foote, Räty’s letter grade would be much lower because he hasn’t fully earned his head coach’s trust. But his underlying numbers have been solid. He has three goals and 11 points through 33 games and had a stretch in which he was in on five of six Canucks goals. Feel a C+ is a fair grade, all things considered.

Max Sasson – C+

Sasson’s speed alone earned an NHL contract. After what was a hot start to the Abby line, Sasson has slowed down. He’s been asked to play higher in the lineup because of the team’s centre deficiencies, but that hasn’t necessarily translated into production. He has eight goals and two assists for 10 points this season. Where he really struggles is in the faceoff dot, where he wins just 40.8% of his draws. He projects to be more of a winger on the team once they get some healthy bodies back and can afford to move him there.

Arshdeep Bains – F

Bains just had enough games played to make the list. He gets a failing grade just because of the opportunity he was handed to begin the season. With the Nils Höglander injury, Bains started the season in the top six on Chytil’s line. He even got penalty killing time. However, that was short-lived: he was quickly demoted and couldn’t perform against weaker opponents. He was placed on waivers and was not claimed. Seems like a fail is a fair grade.

Defencemen​

Filip Hronek – A+

Hronek was one of the best Canucks when Quinn Hughes was on the team. But that’s even more glaring now without Hughes. After a pair of points in Game 41, Hronek is now tied with Elias Pettersson for the team lead in points with 25. In the 10 games without Hughes, Hronek has nine points, and has logged 24+ minutes in eight of those games. Oh, he also leads the team with a plus-three rating while averaging over three minutes more ice time than the next highest Canuck. He’s been one of the few players to step up their game this season, so Hronek undoubtedly deserves an A+.

Tom Willander – B-

Has his season been perfect? No. But for a player who many believed needed more time to develop in the AHL before he made an impact at the NHL level, he’s been pretty darn good. There are always going to be growing pains for a 20-year-old defenceman as he transitions to the professional level, but he’s going through the motions and learning fast, which has kept him in the NHL so far. Heck, he’s even getting PP1 time now. There are so many dark spots surrounding the team this season, but watching the progression of Willander has been exciting.

Tyler Myers – C

It hasn’t been a great season for Myers. After back-to-back resurgent seasons, the 35-year-old looks to be hitting a decline. He isn’t the strong shutdown defenceman he moulded into over the past few years. Where he does hold value is in his veteran leadership and ability to help the young defenceman develop on a pairing with him.

Marcus Pettersson – C+

Most of the same things can be said about Pettersson. By no means is he declining because of age, but it’s easy to notice that his game hasn’t fully translated to Foote’s new systems. The defensive defenceman has been logging heavy minutes, which has only increased since Hughes was traded. He has an even plus-minus rating, which, considering the Canucks’ team defence, is actually pretty good, so he gets the slight edge over Myers for those reasons.

Elias Pettersson – C-

It’s safe to say it hasn’t been the sophomore season DPetey was hoping for. After a strong, physical 28-game stint at the tail end of last season, Pettersson has often found himself serving as a healthy scratch as punishment for defensive mishaps. Now, it’s important to remember that Pettersson was sheltered in his minutes last year and is now being tested with harder minutes and some PK time. Young defencemen are going to make mistakes, and the best way to learn from them is to play through them. That said, the C- grade is deserving.

Goaltenders​

Thatcher Demko – B

Demko has shown flashes of his old self this season. Although his 8-8-1 record may not reflect that, his 2.72 goals-against average and .906 save percentage might. He even had a stretch during the Canucks’ four-game winning streak in which he allowed two goals in three games. He’s slowed down since the Christmas break, but when he’s been healthy this season, Demko has been a bright spot in goal for his team.

Kevin Lankinen – C-

Lankinen in the shootout? That’s an A+. But on his season as a whole, it may even be lower than the C-. Last year, he was the reason the Canucks were nearly in a playoff spot. But that has regressed to his worst season in the NHL, as he has a 3.37 goals against average and a .884 save percentage. How much is that him regressing after a breakout campaign, and how much is that the new team defence? The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. Regardless, a first-half worthy of a C- for the Finn.

What do you think, Canucks fans? Which of these letter grades do you strongly agree/disagree with? Let us know in the comments below!

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/letter-grades-each-vancouver-canuck-midway-point-season
 
Canucks: Braeden Cootes and Team Canada earn Bronze Medal at 2026 World Juniors

Vancouver Canucks 2025 first-round pick Braeden Cootes is heading back to the WHL with hardware.

Canada closed out the 2026 World Junior Championship with a 6–3 victory over Finland, capturing the bronze medal and ending a two-year medal drought for the program. The win marked Canada’s first medal since winning gold in 2023 and its first bronze since 2012 — a tournament that also ended with a victory over the Finns.

After a heartbreaking semifinal loss to Czechia, Canada earned a chance at redemption against a Finnish team that had fallen to Sweden in an overtime thriller the night before.

Canada strikes early, trades first-period blows​


The game opened at a frantic pace. Canada wasted little time getting on the board, as Michael Hage slipped a perfect feed to Sam O’Reilly just over a minute into the contest, setting up a crafty finish to make it 1–0.

CANADA OPENS THE SCORING 🔥

Sam O'Reilly finishes off the Hage pass to make it 1-0 early.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/d09QNGKNSF

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

Finland answered immediately on its first shot. Arttu Väliäla collected a drop pass in the slot, used traffic to his advantage, and snapped a shot past Carter George’s blocker to even the score.

FINLAND ANSWERS RIGHT AWAY 👀

Arttu Välilä scores on Finland's first shot of the game.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/VjtZTvaDlY

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

The chaos continued moments later, and this time, it came off the stick of a Canucks prospect.

Braeden Cootes jumped on a pass from Keaton Verhoeff, cut to the middle, spun toward the net, and snapped a shot blocker-side to restore Canada’s lead before the five-minute mark.

CANADA AND FINLAND TRADING GOALS 👀

Braeden Cootes makes it 2-1 Canada just five minutes into the game!#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/luF9BGktMJ

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

Just past the midpoint of the opening frame, Canada ran into penalty trouble. Finland capitalized after a failed clearing attempt, working the puck around the umbrella before Julius Miettinen dropped to one knee and fired a shot through George to tie the game at two.

FINLAND TIES IT ON THE POWER-PLAY 🔥

Julius Miettinen makes it a 2-2 game.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/38NpxaBlXT

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

However, Canada had the final say in the period. On the power play, Zayne Parekh walked the blue line and wired a wrist shot bar-down, capping the first with a 3–2 Canadian lead.

PAREKH RECORDS HIS 12TH POINT 🔥

He's now tied Alex Pietrangelo (2010) & Bryan McCabe (1995) for most points by a Canadian defenceman at a single #WorldJuniors. pic.twitter.com/A8Uac4S1Jx

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

The goal was Parekh’s 12th point of the tournament, tying Alex Pietrangelo and Bryan McCabe for the most points by a Canadian defenceman in a single World Junior event.

Parekh makes history, Canada pulls away​


Parekh didn’t wait long to break the record outright.

Early in the second period, he pinched aggressively to keep a puck alive, which eventually found its way to Tij Iginla. Iginla slid the puck to Porter Martone in the slot, and the winger made no mistake, beating Petteri Rimpinen clean to double Canada’s lead. With the assist, Parekh became the most productive defenceman in Canadian World Junior history with 13 points.

Canada continued to press. Minutes later, O’Reilly struck again, redirecting a Gavin McKenna one-timer to make it 5–2 and put Canada firmly in control.

ANOTHER ONE FOR O'REILLY 🗣️

Canada converts on the power-play to make it a 5-2 game.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/ULv2ZtyLHk

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

Finland pushed back late in the period, cutting the deficit to two when Heikki Ruohonen slipped a shot under George’s blocker off the rush, but Canada settled things in the third.

FINLAND MAKES IT A TWO-GOAL GAME 👀

Heikki Ruohonen makes it 5-3 late in the 2nd period.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/HwOL4SZ0Ev

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

After spending much of the tournament as a facilitator, McKenna grabbed his fourth goal after finding multiple teammates with opportunities. McKenna jumped on a rebound to triple the team’s lead en route to the Bronze Medal finish.

MCKENNA MAKES IT A 6-3 GAME 🔥

That's a four point night for him and Michael Hage.#WorldJuniors pic.twitter.com/CVTa0ZiGI5

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 5, 2026

Team Canada: You’re the 2026 Bronze Medal winners.

CANADA BEATS FINLAND TO WIN BRONZE AT THE #WorldJuniors 🥉 pic.twitter.com/3EZtwkuGtB

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) January 6, 2026

What it means for Cootes and Canada​


After earning Gold at the U18’s back in May, Cootes wins his second medal within a year. Over seven games, the Alberta native averaged 8:48 of ice time, contributing two goals and seven shots as a fourth-line depth player. As an 18-year-old, he is eligible to return in 2027, where he’s likely to enjoy a much larger role (if loaned from Vancouver).

Reports indicate that Cootes was traded from the Seattle Thunderbirds to the Prince Albert Raiders on Monday. However, nothing has been made official. He has 23 points (10 goals, 13 assists) through 17 games as captain of the Seattle Thunderbirds.

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/vancou...-canada-earns-bronze-medal-2026-world-juniors
 
NHL Notebook: Flyers extend offseason Canucks centre target Christian Dvorak

Welcome back to NHL Notebook — the series here at CanucksArmy where we deliver you news and notes from around the National Hockey League — oftentimes through a Vancouver Canucks-tinted lens!

The Vancouver Canucks’ top mission this offseason was to find another centre to help complement Filip Chytil in the middle six. They set their sights on Christian Dvorak as their top target and threw both big money and term at him, despite him not panning out in his last destination with the Montreal Canadiens.

But it still wasn’t enough to entice Dvorak, as he wound up betting on himself, taking a one-year, $5.4 million contract with the Philadelphia Flyers. And it paid off.

Flyers extend Dvorak​


The Philadelphia Flyers announced on Monday evening that they had come to an agreement with centreman Christian Dvorak on a five-year, $5.15 million AAV extension.

DONE DEAL FOR DVO. 📃✍️

We have agreed to terms with forward Christian Dvorak on a five-year contract extension worth an average annual value of $5.15M. https://t.co/0jLng32Pec

— Philadelphia Flyers (@NHLFlyers) January 6, 2026

Dvorak, 29, fully transformed into the Flyers’ top centre, and the points have followed. Through just 39 games, Dvorak has nine goals and 25 points, with a plus-eight rating in 17:06 minutes of average ice time. The Palos, Illinois native is on an 82-game pace to set career highs in goals (19), assists (34) and points (53) in his first year with the Flyers.

He has spent most of his time skating on a line with Trevor Zegras, who was also acquired by the Flyers this summer. The duo has played a big part in the Flyers’ competitiveness this season, as they currently hold the top spot in the Eastern Conference Wild Card and are just four points out of the top spot in the Metropolitan Division.

Looking back, Dvorak made the right decision not to come to Vancouver. The reported offer from the Canucks to Dvorak was a three-year, $4 million AAV contract. He may have gotten similar deployment as a top-line centre, especially with the number of injuries the Canucks suffered down the middle, but he wouldn’t have the same supporting cast to help him thrive.

Instead, he earned $1.4 million more this season and played in a more favourable offensive environment, which helped him secure a long-term contract in his preferred location. Now, he’ll make $25.75 million more over the next five seasons with the Flyers, rather than having two more years on a deal with a rebuilding/retooling Canucks.

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/nhl-no...couver-canucks-centre-target-christian-dvorak
 
The Stanchies: Canucks nearly ruin the perfect tank game, still find a way to lose 5-3 to Sabres

The Buffalo Sabres represent the world in which the Vancouver Canucks make a spirited run for the playoffs. Coming off a 10-game winning streak that was stopped by Brendan Gaunce, as expected, the Sabres have just now put themselves within a point of a Wild Card spot. Which is the reality the Canucks would face should they ever decide to go on a spirited run of their own, that even after racking up all those dubs, it still takes even more spirited winning on top of that to leapfrog enough teams to even stay in conversation with the playoffs.

And after watching the Sabres defeat the Canucks 5-3, it just gets harder and harder to envision a scenario in which Vancouver finds a way to stay hot long enough to start stringing together victories. PDO benders aside, the Canucks just have no juice. No aura. No moxie. No tenacity. No vigour. No fortitude. No pluck. No spunk. No oomph. No pep. Not even a little vim. Certainly no mettle. Surely no zing. Never zing.

The point is, watching the Canucks is downright depressing right now. And while adding up the losses in their thirst for first is clearly the right move at the moment, when you hear talks that the Canucks might be looking to extend Kiefer Sherwood, it feels rather deflating.

Which isn’t to say I don’t appreciate Kiefer Sherwood, as he’s a very easy player to enjoy. In a perfect world, he would very much be part of an elite third line for a playoff-contending team.

But Vancouver is in a position where there is just such a dour cloud hanging over the team that they should truly be looking to trade anyone and anything with a pulse, save for a handful of the younger players. “Signing veterans for the culture” is a proud tradition in hockey, but when you’re dealing with a team that had a generational locker room divide that single-handedly took down the Quinn Hughes era, I don’t know how you don’t just try and trade as many of the veterans as you can in an attempt at a total restart.

Hand the keys over to the kids and see what vibe they can generate. Bring in new veterans when the time comes and have them walk into the culture your new core created. I know “But the Sabres!” was the boogeyman for a total rebuild for years, but if your pro scouting is on the ball, and you have enough lottery tickets in the form of draft picks, how is that not the right way forward with this team?

Because the truth of the matter is this team’s future isn’t with Brock Boeser, or Elias Pettersson, or Thatcher Demko. The retool of a two-year turnaround is quaint, but the reality is this team will be struggling for many years while they try to inject enough talent to be consistent contenders for the postseason.

So until then, nobody should be safe. Every option should be explored. And extending veterans’ contracts should be the last thing on your mind going forward.

I am at the point where it feels like even the veterans themselves would prefer a fresh start elsewhere, as I cannot think of a less motivating line in the NHL than Evander Kane, Brock Boeser and Elias Pettersson. And I don’t say that to be mean! I am not using snark! I just, man, when I watched that line against the Sabres in the third period, it just felt so underwhelming. I could almost feel the lack of excitement and energy oozing off of them through the screen.

I just don’t know if the Canucks have ever felt less dynamic than they do right now. What I do know is that when Kiefer Sherwood and Drew O’Connor are your most consistent, exciting offensive players at even strength, then your roster is problematic.

So while the Canucks may have fallen one Brendan Gaunce short of beating the Sabres, it doesn’t change the fact that this isn’t a retool year; it should be a full-on rebuild.

Otherwise, we are just doomed to repeat ourselves, forever stuck in the time loop of “man so tight, almost like a playoff game.”

Best showing your intentions early
U.S. Olympian Thompson pounces on loose puck in slot and quickly whips home 21st goal of season and ninth in last 13 games to open scoring. #Canucks #Sabres

— Ben Kuzma 🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@benkuzma) January 7, 2026

Tage Thompson is a giant man who scores a lot of goals, with hands so soft they should be illegal on someone like him. It’s the “Todd Bertuzzi” white unicorn all general managers chase, that really big beefy boy who can destroy people equally with a big hit as well as a deft dangle.

So it was not too surprising when Thompson was the guy who opened the scoring for Buffalo, when a fortuitous bounce saw the puck land in his feet after a nice rush from Bowen Byram:

Marcus Pettersson tries his best to handle Tage, and while I won’t bemoan someone losing that battle, we still have to point out that ultimately, MP3 failed on his assignment. I give him credit for trying to take away Tage’s stick for as long as possible, but ultimately, the ogre who haunted the halls of Hogwarts is able to shield him off the puck and snipe one past Demko.

The good news is that it wasn’t an egregious defensive breakdown that caused this goal. The bad news is that some of those come later.

Best cursed image
LET BOESER SCORE OH MY GOD

— kay ❋ (@quinnspetey) January 7, 2026

Much like Chuck McGill, Brock Boeser lives and dies by lighting the lamp, something he has struggled with as of late. He did manage two assists in this contest, which is a nice showing for a top player in dire need of points, but ultimately, his whole thing is shooting the puck real good and stuff. This continues to escape him due to a variety of bad luck, uninspired play at times, and, of course, bees.

He did almost score on the Canucks first power play of the game when he had Ukko-Pekka Luukonen swimming in his crease for a rebound, before ultimately shuffling a backhander wide of the net:

We all kind of knew that Quinn Hughes elite puck control hid the impact having so many passenger players had on the Canucks, and as much as JT Miller remains a hotly debated player in this town, his absence is felt in that regards as well. Add in Elias Pettersson losing his swag/mojo/whatever fun name for confidence you want to assign, and you have a team that just lacks play drivers.

You see flashes of it in Liam Ohgren, Elias Pettersson does something once in a while to remind you that he’s still inside there somewhere, and Conor Garland is probably their best puck on the stick guy right now, but ultimately this is a team that doesn’t have the horses to play any kind of hockey but work the puck down low and feed it to the point or throw it in front.

Actually, oddly enough, Evander Kane is one of their more dynamic forwards in that I think he makes some of the better passes on the team. It’s just the whole lack of defense thing kind of takes away from it.

Which is why Kiefer Sherwood and Drew O’Connor probably stand out in this system. They have the speed and effort to get in on the forecheck and force their way to the net, which is what Sherwood did on the Canucks first powerplay of the game:

He fights off a check, gets the puck back and feeds the point, then gets off a shot in the bumper spot before collecting his rebound and getting that on net as well.

Even though all the Canucks goals came late in the game, I would say the first period was their best effort of the night. They generated their most amount of high danger chances in the opening frame and generally looked like they had some energy to their efforts. They actually generated five shots on that first power play and if it weren’t for the high level play of Luukkonen, the Canucks most likely score there.

You at least felt like it was a possibility they might get a goal in the first period, which is something I didn’t feel for a single moment during the second period.

Best double Dion homage
Krebs with a hit in the Dzone that wiped out two #Canucks like they were bowling pins. Sheesh. #Sabres

— Mike Harrington (@ByMHarrington) January 7, 2026

Peyton Krebs threw the best hit of the night when he ordered the two for one special after he landed a hit on Nils Höglander that then took out Liam Öhgren, thus proving my theory that Krebs hates umlauts more than any other player in the NHL:

You may laugh at this, but which diacritical marks are next? The Trema? The circumflex? The tilde??

I swear to god, if you touch the cedilla…

Where does it stop, Peyton?

Where. Does. It. Stop.

Best if it doesn’t work, try try again
The Canucks constantly feed the puck back to their points. How often do those points score on their shots? One percent? Two percent? #Canucks

— Kerry Banks (@bad_kicker) January 7, 2026

The Canucks second power play did not go nearly as well as their first, as not only did they generate zero shots on net, they also gave up a a goal on an odd-man rush counter attack:

Tom Willander manages to not play neither the shot nor the pass, which allows Alex Tuch to find Cody McLeod for the clinical finish. Willander probably needs to play that with more patience, as you can see the second he lunges for the puck Tuch passes around him with ease, almost as if he was waiting for that movement, so mark this down as another one of those “Welcome to the NHL, kid” moments for the young defenseman.

Best keeping up with the Buffalos
Buff speed is much better than #canucks .. not enough speed on the team.

— Robbie Mann (@RobbieMann77) January 7, 2026

While Vancouver did genuinely play well in the first period, it did feel like Buffalo was getting the more dynamic chances. Which again, that’s sort of been the storyline all season long, that’s kind of how you get to the bottom of the standings. You work your bag off, but you simply aren’t good enough to create enough offense. You live your life off of thoughts, prayers, PDO and lucky bounces, which doesn’t make for the most exciting hockey in the world.

Meanwhile Buffalo was able to cycle the puck in the offensive zone and almost find Josh Doan for the tap in at the side of the net:

Chalk that up to another blown defensive moment for the Canucks as well, though, because for reasons (bees?) unbeknownst to me, Tyler Myers moves off of Doan to try and close the gap on Mattias Samuelsson, putting Höglander in the awkward spot of having to try and jump up to take his previous check.

Is this the complicated hockey Adam Foote talks about that we wouldn’t understand? Where you play man to man, but you can change which man if you’re feeling it, even if it means confusing your teammates into blown coverage all season long? Perhaps.

Alex Tuch then almost made it 3-0 after a diving Josh Norris got the puck out of the zone and sent the Sabres on an odd man rush adventure:

First off, absolutely love that effort from Norris. Dude dives twice to get the puck out and that is the kind of stuff you can inject straight into my veins.

Secondly, I think Zeev Buium plays this a little too aggressive, as he jumps up to make a play on Jason Zucker, but again a Buffalo veteran uses that to his advantage by feeding the puck over to Tuch to skate into a breakaway in the space behind Zeev. Kiefer Sherwood is around the area, but he has to absolutely hoof it to try and get back into the play, now that Buium has left the scene.

To make matters worse, both Buium and Sherwood track Zucker after the breakaway instead of Tuch, leading to Owen Power skating right into a terrific scoring chance set up by that same Tuch, forcing Demko to make a tremendous stop.

If anything it was one of the more entertaining first periods of the season from Vancouver at least.

Best shorthanded kings
Turned the game on just in time to watch Sherwood pass the puck to Connor who’s 2 feet in front of the night and still manages to miss.

Please stop passing to DOC

— Farine (@_Farine) January 7, 2026

DOC and Sherwood are not only the even strength kings, but they are now the shorthanded kings as well. Long gone are the days of Elias Pettersson and JT Miller using shorthanded odd man rushes as the only place in the world they could still connect as humans, now we live in the reign of the cowboys:

The reason you feed DOC there is because Kiefer had nowhere else to shoot. Maybe you can pop a low shot for a rebound, but man alive, in a season like this go for the pomp and circumstance. If you’re going to lose a game, give me a clean one timer shorthanded finish versus banging in a greasy one.

The only other option would have been to swing to his backhand and go top shelf like a young Igor Chernyshov, but that would require multiple draft picks and rebuilding and such.

The Sabres would then almost score on a Noah Östlund scoring chance after Brock Boeser deflected a pass behind his own defense:

I am mostly showing this because I want to believe in a world in which Noah Östlund joins Liam Öberg and Jonathan Lekkerimäki on Vancouver, proving some sort of HUT based chemistry bonus that pushes their OV up to like 96 or whatever.

The Kyle Wellwood rejoins the team after the Canucks pull him from a special throwback pack and he’s like 99 OV, and now we’re talking about a proper rebuild.

That’s how the NHL works, right?

Best the Big Short
Sherwood having a tough game, that stock keeps plummeting #Canucks

— TheCanucksCurse (@TheCanucksCurse) January 7, 2026

The Sabres would then make it 3-0 on another Byram assisted rush, as this time he purposely found his target in the form of one Alex Tuch, who was able to lift the puck up high despite being in tight on Demko:

Byram basically walks around Drew O’Connor and PO Joseph, before finding a wide open Tuch after Kiefer Sherwood kind of goes full JT Miller on his defensive coverage.

Which again, that’s sort of a staple of this team. Losing their man, leaving guys open, the GOTI system Tocchet left in place is long gone as not a game goes by where you don’t see multiple Canucks looking lost and confused in their own end.

Don’t believe me? Here’s Jake DeBrusk, someone who has played better since the fear of the healthy scratch was instilled upon him, just sort of floating away from Zach Benson despite being the first forward back:

He ends up chasing the puck far side, which leads to a lot of open ice as the Sabres rush the puck forward on net.

Then you had Alex Tuch almost scoring again, this time after Jason Zucker finds him all alone in front after Evander Kane and Brock Boeser combine to both blow coverage:

Tuch literally just skates in a giant circle and finds himself open right between the veteran wingers and easily gets a dangerous shot on net.

You then had Andre the Giant Tage Thompson showcasing the joys of big beefy centers, as he absolutely bodied Elias Pettersson off of the puck behind the net before finding Doan for another scoring chance in the crease:

It was just another night in which you found yourself watching another team in the middle of the pack with more weapons, leaving you nervous about what this management might do if this team does happen to go on a little bit of a hot streak before the trade deadline.

Surely you can’t watch the Avalanche and think this year is your year. Surely.

Best veteran presence
Don’t worry, folks, a Kiefer Sherwood contract extension will cure all! #Canucks

— Grady Sas (@GradySas) January 7, 2026

Leave it to Sherwood and O’Connor to generate the best scoring chance of the second period, as this time Kiefer spins and puts the puck wide of an open net:

I think Luukkonen tries to sell the Drew O’Connor body contact a little too hard, as he flops forward and ends up stuck in a save animation while facing backwards, so he’s lucky Sherwood just missed on the 360 no scope shot.

Best hold on there
You cannot watch this #Canucks team play and tell me honestly that there’s a credible path to turning it around quickly without a period of disciplined rebuilding.

— Thomas Drance (@ThomasDrance) January 7, 2026

Spoke like a man who didn’t see this tip pass from Karlsson, that’s the kind of play you can retool with:

Fil Hronek to Linus Kalrsson to Liam Ohgren, that my friends was the first shot five minutes into the third period and what a shot it was.

If it wasn’t for the flurry of last minute goals from the Canucks, this game felt like it had slipped into a coma as Buffalo looked to coast out the rest of the game.

Best why not make it four
What the fuck am i watching!!! #Canucks

— Jaden (@tedhitchcock007) January 7, 2026

Why waste time defend when few defend do trick?

Yes, that’s Planet Ice Evander Kane just sort of vibing in his own zone as Zach Metsa floats by him to score his first career NHL goal, as the Sabres fourth line makes the Canucks pay with their top line on the ice.

I will say it again, there is just something about the combination of Kane, Boeser and Pettersson that I do not enjoy together. Whatever it was the Lotto Line had, this is the opposite of that. It’s like watching your parents divorce on ice or something.

Kane basically stops skating and hands the open lane to Metsa, making it 4-0 Sabres and all I will say is I saw Andrei Kuzmenko get traded for less.

Best I didn’t hear no bell
DeBrusk trade value 📈 😃#Canucks

— Michael Paweska (@mrpaweska) January 7, 2026

The Canucks got a bit of a break when Jake DeBrusk got high sticked, giving his team a four minute powerplay to work with, resulting in DeBrusk scoring the first goal of the game for Vancouver:

Nothing fancy, just some old fashioned get the puck on net and see what happens type of hockey, and it works. DeBrusk uses some nifty hand-eye coordination to bat the puck in out of the air, but that’s sort of his thing, the guy excels in the blue paint game because of that.

DeBrusk would almost score again on the second powerplay, this time after once again setting up shop in Tim Hortons and almost deflecting a puck passed the Sabres goaltender:

I will say that the healthy scratch seems to have done wonders for Jake, so maybe the Canucks should start using that punishment/motivation technique more liberally with every player?

Best what’s good for the goose
Holy what a snipe from Petey #Canucks

— james cooper (@User673987) January 7, 2026

In what looked like a mirror image of the Sabres first goal, Elias Pettersson found himself in between the faceoff circles after some fortuitous bounces gifted him the puck in his feet:

EP40 spins it to wins it, and of course a game in which the Canucks looked as dead as the Dread Pirate Roberts have now managed to make it a two goal lead.

But surely it stops there.

Best it doesn’t stop there
Liam Ohgren took a big hit to make a play in his own zone and gets rewarded by scoring a goal. Tough kid

— Satiar Shah (@SatiarShah) January 7, 2026

Liam Öhgren would then make it 4-3, leaving you enough time to ponder “if only Evander Kane had tried to play actual defense on that fourth goal” before we watch some Liam clips.

I want to say that Liam Öhgren has impressed me the most from the players who joined from Minnesota. That’s not to say Buium won’t develop into a top player or that Marco Rossi won’t end up being a top six producer, but just as it currently stands, Liam is my boy.

I just like the way he plays, and you can tell a lot about a hockey player by the way they pick themselves up off the ice after a hit.

Some players get trucked into the boards, and they look like they really struggle to get to their feet. You can just tell they didn’t like that hit one bit, no sir, and they would like it if that never happened again.

With Liam, though, he eats the hits and tends to bounce back up.

Just before his goal, Liam races back hard to win a chase for the puck, knowing he is going to pay the price physically:

You see him land on the ice, take a split second to make sure he isn’t broken in half, then jumps up and gets back into the play.

Eventually this leads to Linus Karlsson making a fantastic forecheck behind the net, getting the puck back to the point to Marcus Pettersson, who then finds Liam who shoots through the screen of Max Sasson to make it a one goal game:

I don’t know the ceiling for Liam’s NHL career, but I will say that I just really like the way he plays the game. I just think this is one of those guys you can win hockey games with, where the moment is never too big, and he’s willing to do whatever it takes to win.

Best fun while it lasted
#Canucks take the L

— David Cee 🇨🇦🇮🇹🇫🇮 (@CanucksIn4) January 7, 2026

Canucks take the win in life, that is. The thirst for first won on the day, as the Sabres would score on the empty net fairly quickly after Demko was pulled:

Which left the Canucks just enough time for Buium to shine a little bit, as he almost scored on a rush to the net in the dying seconds of the game:

And then Zeev almost set up Boeser for a goal moments later after another slick offensive move in the slot:

Which is pretty much all you are hoping for at this point. The Canucks continuing to improve their drafting odds, while some of their younger players have some big moments to shine in.

It might not be fun to watch at times, but at least it’s trending in the right direction.

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/stanch...k-game-still-find-way-lose-5-3-buffalo-sabres
 
Is there a number at which a Kiefer Sherwood extension would make sense for the Canucks?

It didn’t take long after the NHL lifted its holiday roster freeze for the trade-related drama to pick up surrounding the Vancouver Canucks once again.

There may have been a sense that things would progress fairly naturally and straightforwardly from the Quinn Hughes trade onward. Having already dealt their most valuable trade-chip, the Canucks – as voiced by POHO Jim Rutherford – seemed to verbally commit to a genuine rebuild.

Then came the second-guessing, the hedging, the talk of ‘hybridization.’ And the same old worries began to seep in again.

Now, if there was one thing that the Canucks faithful had been told was going to happen for sure, it was that the team was going to sell high on premium pending UFA Kiefer Sherwood. The fairly consistent talk over the past month had been that Sherwood would be sold to the highest bidder and that the bidding should reach at least as high as a first-round pick, if not higher.

Many had gone so far as to almost consider that first-rounder an asset already in hand.

But then, this past weekend, Elliotte Friedman dropped a bomb on that notion by reporting that Canucks management had decided to attempt to re-sign Sherwood after all and had made him a significant contract offer.

Understandably, Vancouver fans reacted as if a rug had been pulled out from under them. To be told to expect the team to make a choice that will benefit them in the long run, only to see them switch gears and take a more short-term approach, would not just be frustrating; it would be something that this fandom has experienced far too much in the past.

But, for one, an extension has not been signed yet, and until that happens, a Sherwood trade still remains the most likely outcome.

And, for two, Sherwood is a unique enough player that he bears at least some consideration as to whether there is any type of extension out there that might make sense for both team and player.

Obviously, there are plenty of numbers that might work for the Canucks. If Sherwood was willing to sign a new version of the same two-year, $1.5 million contract he’s currently playing under, well, why wouldn’t the Canucks say ‘yes’ to that?

Of course, Sherwood has earned a much larger deal than that. Rumour has it that the Canucks’ latest offer for him was somewhere in the neighbourhood of four years at a $4 million AAV. How workable is something like that?

The average NHL salary for the 2025-26 is about $3.5 million. By that standard, all Sherwood would have to do over the next four years to return surplus value on a $4 million cap hit would be to perform slightly above-average, and that sounds pretty doable, right?

Unfortunately, the NHL’s average salary is heavily skewed by the biggest superstar contracts at the top of the charts. The median salary is lower than that, and if we think about the average salary for a ‘middle-six’ player – as in someone who is not top-line – then that’s probably closer to about $2-2.5 million.

So, by that notion, Sherwood would have to really outperform the average player in his same position over the next four years for such a contract to have positive value. Again, that sounds doable, but it’s starting to sound like a more risky proposition.

It’s not too hard to find some cautionary tales around the NHL. There’s a good one right next door. The Edmonton Oilers traded for Trent Frederic at the cost of a couple draft picks, and then doubled down on that decision by signing Frederic to an eight-year, $3.85 million AAV extension.

Many gawked at that price tag, but the argument made at the time was roughly what we’ve stated above: it’s barely above the NHL average, the salary cap is going up anyway, so, really, what could it hurt?

Already in Year One of that contract, however, Frederic is hurting. He was recently made a healthy scratch, and the Oilers are committed to that deal for seven more years after that one. It’s not hard to see how a lengthy extension for a role-playing veteran can turn sour.

Nobody is suggesting that the Canucks are going to sign Sherwood to an eight-year deal. But Sherwood is already 30, and will turn 31 next month. Even a four-year deal buys ages 31 through 35. Those are not exactly prime years. Sure, Sherwood has developed later than most, and maybe his prime comes a little later than most. But the risk for a drop-off is there, and it gets steeper with each year added to an extension.

There are other factors to consider here. There’s the roster jam the Canucks are already experiencing up front, and that is only going to become exacerbated in 2026-27 if the team isn’t able to sell off some pieces as young players join the roster. On the other hand, you’ve got the mentorship factor and the possibility of Sherwood having a positive impact on the development of those youngsters.

But the most important factor to consider in a Sherwood extension is the opportunity cost, which is the potential trade return given up by choosing to keep him instead.

We tend to agree with the speculation that Sherwood should return a first, if not more. He’s one of the more impactful UFA rentals available, period, and that’s before we take into consideration his current $1.5 million cap hit – which could easily be retained down to a below-league-minimum $750,000.

And so, even if we can get to a point where a mid-term, mid-salary extension makes some sense – as in, a point where we can see Sherwood returning fair-to-good value over that rumoured four-year, $4 million AAV deal – we still don’t have the whole equation. Because the real question is this: what’s going to make a bigger positive difference in the long run, four-ish more years of Sherwood, or a new prospect drafted in the first round?

It’s not a slam-dunk here, either. As we said, Sherwood probably has some good years left, and he has proven a capable mentor. Few players set a better example for others with their own play.

But the odds of the Canucks really doing anything of note in those same four years are looking slim. So, the opportunity to use that time to develop a prospect so that they’re ready to fully contribute in a few years – as opposed to moving toward retirement, as Sherwood will be – is the opportunity that aligns far more closely with the team’s realistic timeline.

Think of how much of a difference having just two recent firsts in Tom Willander and Braeden Cootes ‘hit’ has made to the Canucks’ future outlook. It’s what the Canucks need more of, not less.

First-round picks are not guarantees. But the more one has, the better the odds. The Canucks can’t count on the first-round pick they obtained from the Minnesota Wild turning into a good player. But if they make a mid-to-late first-round selection with that pick, and then another with the pick they get for Sherwood, the odds of success have roughly doubled.

Could Sherwood play well enough to give surplus value on a 4×4 contract? Yes, that seems likely. But could he give enough surplus value on that contract to surpass the potential value of his own trade return?

That’s where we hit a snag. And that’s why, really, there is no realistic number that works for both team and player on a Sherwood extension.

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/number-which-kiefer-sherwood-extension-make-sense-vancouver-canucks
 
Canucks: Elias Pettersson dealing with a nagging injury ‘probably for the rest of the season’

Elias Pettersson has returned from an injury that kept him out for eight games, but he says he’s still feeling the effects of it. In conversation with Sportsnet’s Iain MacIntyre, the Vancouver Canucks’ top centre said that his latest ailment is a nagging injury that he’ll have to deal with “probably for the rest of the season.”

“I think I was doing okay,” Pettersson said. “But injuries happen. Now that I’m back, I’m just trying to work my hardest out there and play the right way… It’s going to be a nagging injury for a while, probably the rest of the season. But I can play with it. In some situations, there’s some pain, but I can push through it.”

Pettersson’s injury kept him out for eight games. After playing in the Canucks’ December 5th game against the Utah Mammoth, which the Canucks lost by a final score of 5-1, Pettersson took warmups for the Canucks’ matchup with the Minnesota Wild the next night but did not play. Pettersson previously shared that when he took warmup for that game, he knew his injury would keep him from playing. While Pettersson didn’t divulge exactly what was ailing him or when he sustained the injury, he did share that it caused him to feel pain when shooting the puck.

“There was a lot of pain trying to shoot the puck, but it feels good now,” Pettersson told reporters last month. “You can feel bad off the ice, but when you get on the ice, it feels better. But yeah I tried but it was too much pain.”

In six games since returning from the injury, Pettersson has put up three goals and an assist, and has three points — two goals, one assist — over his last three games.

In the interview with MacIntyre, Pettersson also opened up about recent struggles in his personal life. Most notably, Pettersson talked about he and his wife Katelyn’s miscarriage, which Katelyn shared news of on social media last month. Their baby was due in July. You can read those quotes and the rest of what Pettersson had to say by reading the article over at Sportsnet.ca (linked here).

READ NEXT: Post-Hughes, who is now the Canucks’ most valuable asset?


Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/vancou...n-dealing-nagging-injury-probably-rest-season
 
Canucks trade rumours: What can the Rangers offer up for Kiefer Sherwood?

At the very least, the Vancouver Canucks are keeping their options open when it comes to veteran winger Kiefer Sherwood.

It makes almost too much sense for the club to sell high on him, but they would seemingly like you – and every other NHL team presumably trying to lowball them – to know that they don’t have to trade him, and that they could sign him if they wanted to. So now that we got that out of the way…

Yes, the Canucks, in all likelihood, are going to move on from Kiefer Sherwood at some point between now and the NHL trade deadline. They sent a memo to 31 other NHL teams in November stating they were willing to listen to trade offers for their veteran players, and President of Hockey Operations Jim Rutherford quickly clarified that it was more about getting their trade deadline business out of the way sooner rather than later. In particular, that means moving out their pending UFAs, which is why Sherwood’s name has basically been at the forefront of trade rumours ever since.

The Canucks’ asking price for Sherwood is believed to be a first round pick plus a young player. To this point, no team has matched that, and Sherwood remains a Canuck through the halfway point of the season. Sherwood is on pace for 33 goals and is just two away from breaking the career-high in goals that he set last season, with 40 games left of runway to do so. As a result, Sherwood is due for a big increase from the $1.5 million annual salary he’s earned since the start of last season, when he signed on with the Canucks for two years in free agency. With Sherwood set to turn 31 in March, it doesn’t make much sense for the Canucks to be the ones to sign Sherwood’s next contract, which could very easily start with a five or a six and run anywhere from 4-6 years in length.

The list of potential suitors for Sherwood is rumoured to be a big one, and on Wednesday, one team was pretty firmly added to that list: the New York Rangers. That, of course, was when The Athletic’s Vincent Z. Mercogliano reported that the Rangers have identified Sherwood “as a primary trade target”.

“They were in on star defenseman Quinn Hughes before he was traded to the Minnesota Wild last month,” Mercogliano wrote. “As The Athletic previously reported, and have been pushing hard for Vancouver Canucks winger Kiefer Sherwood, a league source said. The asking price is believed to be a first-round pick and possibly more for the 30-year-old who has netted 17 goals through 42 games and is in the final year of a modest contract that pays him $1.5 million annually. The acquisition cost is prohibitive for the Rangers, but team president Chris Drury’s focus has been on netting a top-nine forward to bolster an offense that ranks among the lowest-scoring in the NHL.”

To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the acquisition cost of Sherwood is prohibitive for the Rangers, just like it has proven to be for every other suitor up to this point. At this stage, it feels like we’re headed for Quinn Hughes territory, where the Canucks simply wait until someone meets their asking price – in the case of Hughes, it was the equivalent of four first round picks – and then pull the trigger on a deal.

In other words, it’s all going to come down to just how badly a team wants to add Sherwood. With Hughes, that team was Bill Guerin’s Minnesota Wild. For Sherwood, could that team be the Rangers?

Why the Rangers want Sherwood​


The reason the Rangers want Sherwood is simple. On top of his now undeniable offensive production, Sherwood’s baseline game makes him a dream for NHL coaches and GMs alike. As Canucks fans know, Sherwood plays with the same desperation and passion that helped him forge an NHL career in his late 20s, every single night. He won’t hurt you defensively, he can kill penalties, and on the forecheck? That’s where Sherwood first gained the attention of the Canucks, when their defencemen were on the receiving end of Sherwood’s crushing hits and pressure while retrieving the puck during the first round of the 2024 playoffs between Vancouver and Nashville.

The Rangers have struggled to score this season and, at the time of this writing, are three points out of a playoff spot, with six teams separating them from the second and final Wild Card spot in a jam-packed Eastern Conference. They would obviously like to give themselves an edge in that race, and they might want to do it sooner, rather than later.

Now, the reason the Rangers wouldn’t want Sherwood – especially at a hefty acquisition cost – is also important to mention as well. New York just lost both star goaltender Igor Shesterkin and defenceman Adam Fox to injuries this week. Shesterkin was forced to leave Monday’s game after being involved in a collision with Utah’s JJ Peterka, and is expected to head to IR at some point this week, with no clear timetable for return provided. If he’s out for an extended period of time, adding Sherwood to a team that has relied heavily on their All-Star netminder might not only be a moot point, but downright reckless as well. As for Fox, he was just activated from LTIR and played just three games before landing right back on LTIR, meaning he’ll be sidelined for at least another month.

Those are two key contributors for the Rangers, and it would be a bold move to add to a team on the outside looking in of the playoff picture that just lost those two players. But let’s say, for argument’s sake, that Sherwood is their guy, and that they plan on signing him to an extension – meaning he wouldn’t simply be a rental – which would make the move much more defensible.

What would the Rangers give up?​


Let’s say the Rangers meet the Canucks’ rumoured asking price and cough up a first round pick along with a B-level prospect or young roster player. The Rangers own two first round picks in this year’s draft. One is their own, and the other is Carolina’s, which the Rangers acquired in the K’Andre Miller trade. However, the Hurricanes first comes with a condition: better of CAR or DAL 2026 first round pick and is top-10 protected. But based on the current standings, the pick would almost certainly be a late first round pick, as Carolina sits fifth and Dallas is second in the NHL standings. The Rangers would almost certainly prefer to acquire that pick in a trade rather than their own, which will likely be in the 12-20 range instead of the 22-32 range.

As for the player involved? A quick look at DailyFaceoff.com’s ranking of the Rangers’ prospect pool tells us their top three prospects are: Gabe Perreault, Scott Morrow, and Malcolm Spence.

Now, obviously, the Canucks would be ecstatic to get their hands on any of these prospects, especially Perreault, who has five points through 11 NHL games and is currently skating on the Rangers’ third line. But you’re kidding yourself if you think the Rangers would ever give up a first round pick plus one of their top three prospects. Instead, if the Canucks really wanted to get one of these prospects, they’d almost certainly attempt to entice the Rangers into a one-for-one swap of Sherwood for one of them. And honestly, they might even need to sweeten the deal a bit to get their hands on a prospect like Perreault, for example.

But if the Canucks stick with their ask of a first round pick plus a player, we can assume that Perreault, Morrow, and Spence are off the table. Might the Canucks be interested in Brennan Othmann, who the Rangers selected 16th overall in 2021 but has yet to establish himself at the NHL level? Othmann just turned 23 this month and has spent most of his season with the AHL’s Hartford Wolf Pack, where he’s amassed 12 points in 21 games.

What about 19-year-old right-shot shutdown defenceman EJ Emery, whom the Rangers took 30th overall in the 2024 draft? Emery was born and raised in Surrey, and his father, Eric, played pro football for the BC Lions, Calgary Stampeders, and Ottawa Roughriders from 1985 to 1987. Some other names in the Rangers’ pipeline that might entice the Canucks are 20-year-old centre Carey Terrance and 22-year-old AHL winger Brett Berard.

One of those names, along with Carolina’s 2025 first round pick might be exactly what’s on the table if the Rangers are serious about adding Sherwood to their group.

READ NEXT: CANUCKS: IS IT BOESER’S TURN TO TAKE A SEAT IN THE PRESS BOX?


Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/vancou...s-what-new-york-rangers-offer-kiefer-sherwood
 
Instant Reaction: Patrick Kane scores 499th and 500th NHL goals in Canucks’ 5-1 loss to Red Wings

Welcome back to Instant Reaction, the series here at CanucksArmy where we give you our instant reaction to tonight’s Vancouver Canucks game and ask our readers to do the same in the comments section below!

Starting Lineup​

Projected #Canucks lines vs. @DetroitRedWings

Kane. EP40. Boeser.
DeBrusk. Kämpf. Sherwood.
Öhgren. Sasson. Karlsson.
O’Connor. Räty. Höglander.

MP29. Willander.
Buium. Hronek.
EP25. Myers.

🥅Lankinen🥅

4pm on @Sportsnet650 https://t.co/J6DNM1E8Qt pic.twitter.com/p13ceP1hfQ

— Brendan Batchelor (@BatchHockey) January 8, 2026

First Period​


Jake DeBrusk made a strong move towards the net on the opening shift of the game, forcing Simon Edvinsson to take a penalty and put the Canucks on the power play early in this one. On the power play, Elias Pettersson, Tom Willander, and Brock Boeser teamed up on a couple of good looks, but the Canucks’ first man-advantage opportunity of the night was ultimately an unsuccessful one.

Back at 5v5, the Canucks continued to put the pressure on the Red Wings, and five minutes into this one, the Canucks had spent minimal time in their own end and were outshooting the home side 3-0. It was a nice start for them.

Elias Junior Pettersson made a nice play at the Detroit blue line to keep the puck in the offensive end for his team, leading to a great scoring chance for Kiefer Sherwood, whose shot was turned aside by John Gibson. The Wings quickly went the other way with a 2-on-1 of their own, but Kevin Lankinen got a piece of Dylan Larkin’s attempt with his glove, keeping the game scoreless.

The Wings got their first power play chance of the night when Marcus Pettersson tripped up Dylan Larkin. The Canucks killed that one off, but late in the period, Zeev Buium and David Kampf took penalties in rapid succession to give Detroit an extended two-man advantage, and they wasted little time in converting, as Patrick Kane surprised Lankinen with a quick short side shot to open the scoring:

Patrick Kane opens the scoring late in the first period on the two-man advantage.

🎥: Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/E1T3bB7wBU

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 9, 2026

1-0 Wings.

Some takeaways from the first:
-Really liking the look of the Buium-Hronek pairing. When he was originally acquired from the Minnesota Wild, I remember thinking Buium would immediately replace Quinn Hughes on the top pairing and on PP1. And while he did immediately step in and quarterback the Canucks’ first power play unit, it took longer for him to get regular reps next to Hronek, but I’ve liked the look of those together. Hronek has been so good this year, so who better for Buium to learn from?
-I don’t think we talk enough about how disappointing Marcus Pettersson has been this season. Way, way too many minor penalties and downright abysmal play with the puck on his stick. That trade and the subsequent extension look like a big mistake.
-Kevin Lankinen made some good saves, but holy smokes the Wings missed the net on more than one prime scoring opportunities in that opening period.

Second Period​


The Wings picked up where they left off, and didn’t take long to push their lead to two. After Elias Pettersson fanned on a shot attempt, Detroit went the other way and scored after an odd-man rush:

Axel Sandin-Pellikka adds to the Red Wings lead, putting them up 2-0.

🎥: Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/ojg8a9WTud

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 9, 2026

2-0.

Not sure how much the clip does it justice, but this was an absolutely abysmal defensive effort from EP40. Rarely see that from him.

The Canucks got another power play chance shortly after the Sandin-Pellikka goal, and on this one, Jake DeBrusk made good on his chance to get the Canucks on the board.

🚨CANUCKS GOAL🚨

Jake DeBrusk gets the Canucks on the board with yet another powerplay goal to add to his season total.

🎥: Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/NalWB9JvSH

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 9, 2026

Nice play by Zeev Buium at the line in the leadup to this goal. 2-1.

Unfortunately, it didn’t take long for the Wings to answer. Detroit cycled the puck around and broke the Canucks’ defensive system so badly that both Kiefer Sherwood and Tyler Myers (for some reason) were both at the point while the puck was worked down low. Not much chance for Lankinen on this one.

And just like that, the Canucks are back down by two.

🎥: Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/f3eKMMjhIt

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 9, 2026

3-1 Wings.

The Canucks mustered up a strong push to close out the second, but ultimately, they got outscored, outshot, and outworked in the middle frame.

Some takeaways from the second period:
-Prime’s Coast to Coast league whiparound show is truly a gift. If you’ve got an Amazon Prime subscription (which you’ll want for Monday’s game), you already have access to it.
-It’s hard to watch this team’s veterans go through the motions while not really knowing if the Canucks plan to actually get rid of any of them. Is this a rebuild or isn’t it? And if the answer is no, then what’s the actual plan?
-Liking what I’m seeing from Nils Höglander. Time to get him onto Pettersson’s wing. Enough with this fourth line/healthy scratch nonsense. (I wrote this line before the Canucks put Höglander-Pettersson-Boeser together for the final two shifts of the period.

Third Period​


The Canucks entered the third down by a pair of goals, and it stayed that way thanks to Kevin Lankinen making a huge save off of Dylan Larkin early in the frame. The Canucks nearly pulled within one just before the 10-minute mark, when Aatu Räty let fly with a wrister from the point that Drew O’Connor deflected, but John Gibson got just enough of it to hold the shot out.

They kept working hard and kept getting the puck up ice and into the Detroit end, but it felt like the plays died right before the Canucks were actually able to create a scoring chance off of them. It was back-and-forth action for much of the third, and from an entertainment perspective, you couldn’t really complain.

With just under five minutes remaining, the Canucks pulled Thatcher Demko and sent out an extra attacker. And Patrick Kane promptly scored the 500th goal of his NHL career. The Wings spilled out over the boards to celebrate, further prolonging the end of this game.

Patrick Kane gets career goal number 500 on the Canucks empty net.

🎥: Sportsnet | #Canucks pic.twitter.com/ncxm5KO2m1

— CanucksArmy (@CanucksArmy) January 9, 2026

4-1.

Lucas Raymond added another Detroit goal to make it 5-1.

Some takeaways from the third:
-Really liked what Aatu Räty and Drew O’Connor managed to do on a line together. Would love to see Räty keep getting chances.
-Another strong game for Kiefer Sherwood. Friday would be a great day to pull the trigger on a trade.
-This team is a directionless disaster.

What’s your instant reaction to this game? Let us know in the comments section below!

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/instan...-vancouver-canucks-4-1-loss-detroit-red-wings
 
NHL trade values: Could the Canucks get back what they paid for Marcus Pettersson?

As the Vancouver Canucks continue to consider trading off veterans in their so-called hybrid rebuild, and as everyone else speculates about those considerations, there is one name that has been largely absent from the discussions, despite being a somewhat logical candidate for a deal. That player is Marcus Pettersson.

On the surface, that makes some sense. When the team acquired the now-29-year-old Pettersson from Pittsburgh last January, they signed him to a six-year, $5.5 million AAV extension. At that point, Pettersson was clearly a part of the long-term plan in Vancouver.

But here now, a full calendar year later, that long-term plan sure appears to have changed. And one can’t help but wonder whether Pettersson fits into that plan better as a veteran support piece or as a re-cashed trade-chip.

As far as Canucks management and their outward statements are concerned, the current goal seesm to be for them to hang on to all three of their veteran defenders in Pettersson, Filip Hronek, and Tyler Myers. The thinking there is that the veteran trio lines up very well with the unseasoned trio of Tom Willander, Zeev Buium, and Elias Pettersson, and that maintaining the veterans will aid in the development of the youngsters. On that front, the senior Pettersson makes perhaps the most sense to hold onto. Hronek and Myers both play the right side, so if one of them were to theoretically be moved, at least the other would remain. Pettersson, however, is the only vet on the left-side, aside from P-O Joseph and Derek Forbort, who may not return from injury this season.

Trade Pettersson now, and the Canucks would be left with a very raw and inexperienced left side of just Buium, E. Pettersson, and Joseph, and that’s a very dramatic swing for a team that started the season with Quinn Hughes over there.

Then again: who cares? We don’t need ICBC to tell us that the 2025-26 season is a write-off. The Canucks are in second-to-last place, they show no real signs of rebounding from there, and the situation will only presumably get worse as sell-off trades occur over the next two months.

With Pettersson under contract for five more years after this one, the 2025-26 season is not the only consideration here. But the 2026-27 season is not one to pin any hopes on either, and past that point, one has to question the whole ‘mentorship’ angle. Buium and E. Pettersson will be that much older and more experienced by then, and there’s nothing stopping the team from picking up another support vet in the interim, or from developing someone else from within, like Kirill Kudryavtsev.

Suffice it to say that the period of time during which this Pettersson extension was meant to make the biggest difference now neatly aligns with the period of time during which the Canucks are expected to lose, and a lot. That should mean that the team is at least open to exploring Pettersson’s trade value moving forward, as in trying to determine whether he’s worth more to them as a roster player or a trade-chip that has been exchanged for some future assets.

And if they’re considering that, the real question to be asked is whether or not Pettersson could still, at the very least, return what the Canucks paid for him. Is there a refund available here, or are they going to relegated to the equivalent of ‘store credit’?

When Pettersson was acquired by the Canucks, he came along with Drew O’Connor and cost the Canucks a conditional first round pick – previous acquired from the New York Rangers in the JT Miller deal – and prospect Melvin Fernstrom. Part of the valuation, however, included the dumping of Danton Heinen and Vincent Desharnais’ contracts.

It’s not exactly true, but close enough to say that Pettersson cost the Canucks roughly a first rounder. That first rounder was eventually flipped once again to the Philadelphia Flyers, but ended up being used at 12th overall in the most recent draft on prospect Jack Nesbitt.

What we’re really asking then, is if Pettersson could still return a first in his current state.

When Pettersson arrived in Vancouver, he was pitched as a guaranteed-top-four, borderline-top-pairing defender, and through his 31 games with the Canucks to close the 2024-25 season, he played at about that level. Most folks were pleased with Pettersson’s play in general, and the value the Canucks seemed to achieve in locking him up to a reasonable extension early.

It has to be said, however, that Pettersson’s stock has dropped in 2025-26. Offensively, he’s averaged about 30 points a season in his NHL career, but currently has just nine in 43 games, and is thus pacing for fewer than 20. He’s been outscored 23-30 at five-on-five play. His Corsi is at just 45.2%.

Now, any struggles in Vancouver this year have to be at least partially related to the team’s overall struggles. And Pettersson is still carrying his fair share of the load with an average of 20:58 a night. But if he’s not the problem himself, then he hasn’t been much a part of the solution.

Still, one bad season does not erase a decade of top-four play. And that extension, while not as shiny as it first appeared, still rings through as having surplus value. It was signed, after all, before the salary cap leapt up this past offseason, and before it leaps up again next offseason. A $5.5 million cap hit has quickly made the trip all the way to about average for a top-four defender, and will be below-average soon enough. What that means is that all Pettersson has to do is maintain his status as a top-four throughout the next five years for this contract to have fair value. Anything better than that is gravy.

And this becomes especially true when the teams who might consider trading for Pettersson consider their options. There are never all that many quality defenders available in any given trade market, and moving forward, to acquire a player of Pettersson’s ilk through free agency is definitely going to cost a team more than $5.5 million per year.

Put that together with some of Pettersson’s more specific skills, like penalty killing, leadership, and throwing the occasional devastating hit, and one has to imagine that, if the Canucks were offering him around, there would be some interesting suitors.

To return the equivalent of the 12th overall pick may still be a bridge too far at this point. That’s a very valuable asset. But what if the Canucks are looking for just a first round pick, in general? That seems a lot more doable. And that would probably still feel like the Canucks getting their worth from the whole series of transactions.

But would it be worth their while? Probably! First round picks are gold to even a hybrid-rebuilding team, and they remain lottery picks. Any mid-to-late first, like the one the Canucks are currently holding from the Minnesota Wild, has a chance to be an impact player, but they also have a decent chance of busting. Having multiple mid-to-late firsts, however, increases the odds of at least one of them hitting. And the Canucks need some hits more than anything right now.

Pettersson’s own potential as a mentor, as a stabilizer, and perhaps even as someone who can continue to play meaningful minutes toward the end of his contracts as the Canucks become more competitive cannot be discounted. But those are qualities that don’t necessarily need to come from Pettersson, and especially not if he can be cashed in for something the Canucks need right now.

We mentioned Forbort already. The Canucks got a very good year out of Forbort in 2024-25. He became a star penalty killer, played nearly every night, and earned himself a raise – and last year, he did it all for the low, low price of a $1.5 million cap hit.

There’s nothing really stopping the Canucks from trading Pettersson now and then seeking out some lower-cost veterans via free agency to cover any further desire for experience and leadership on their blueline. It might be a ‘have your cake and eat it, too’ scenario, and that makes it sound like something well worth exploring.

After all, who doesn’t like cake?

PRESENTED BY VIVID SEATS




Take $20 off your first Vivid Seats order of $200+ using promo code CANUCKSARMY (new customers only, $200 USD minimum before taxes & fees)

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/nhl-trade-values-could-vancouver-canucks-back-paid-marcus-pettersson
 
Why the Canucks should not trade for Jesperi Kotkaniemi

It appears that a former Vancouver Canucks target is being made available for trade.

According to Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman, the Carolina Hurricanes and Jesperi Kotkaniemi are both looking for a fresh start:

“So, Kotkaniemi did not make the Finnish Olympic team, and we kind of talked about how surprising it is that he really wasn’t on the radar. I think anybody would understand that it was a really painful moment for him. Very, very disappointing.

“Just in making some calls on Thursday … I started hearing Kotkaniemi’s name a bit. I think what’s happened is in the aftermath of him not making the Finnish team, there is an understanding around the league that he needs a fresh start, and the Hurricanes are considering it. I think they have some offers coming their way.

“Kotkaniemi has been in some offers. [The Hurricanes] offered him to LA for Philip Danault; the Kings decided not to do that. They offered him to Vancouver in the Quinn Hughes package – it sounded like their package involved Kotkaniemi and [Alex] Nikishin.”

But in Vancouver, we’ve done this song and dance before with Kotkaniemi. He has been linked to the Canucks for a while, whether in a potential Elias Pettersson trade, a Quinn Hughes trade, or simply as a regular target. However, it didn’t make sense then, when the Canucks were still trying to compete, and it would make even less sense now when they’re headed toward a rebuild.

Kotkaniemi, 25, has only appeared in 25 of the Hurricanes’ 44 games this season, often serving as a healthy scratch. The Finnish centreman has just two goals and six points with a minus-two rating in just 11:08 minutes of average ice time. He’s not trusted to play in every game, and when he does get in, he’s only getting fourth-line minutes.

Not only is the 2018 third-overall pick not producing offensively, or defensively – he’s dead last in Corsi Percentage, Shot Share, Expected Goals Percentage, Scoring Chances, and High-Danger Scoring Chances For Percentage of all Hurricanes forwards at 5v5 – but he’s got an ugly contract that comes with that baggage.

After hitting restricted free agency as a member of the Montreal Canadiens, Kotkaniemi signed an expensive offer sheet with the Hurricanes as a payback move after the Sebastian Aho offer sheet a few summers earlier. The Hurricanes signed Kotkaniemi to a one-year, $6.1 million contract, a deal the Canadiens had no choice but to accept compensation for. In turn, the Hurricanes might now regret this decision, as with a high AAV as an RFA, Kotkaniemi’s qualifying offer would have been high. As a result, the Hurricanes’ hands were tied, as they had to meet the player’s higher ask, which came to an eight-year, $4.82 million AAV contract.

During his time in Carolina, Kotkaniemi reached a career high of 18 goals and 43 points in 2022-23, but has since declined. It’s officially hit rock bottom now with him not even making the lineup every night.

How would he fit in on this Canucks team?

The only reason he fits is that he technically fits the Canucks’ goal of adding players 25 or under right now – he’ll turn 26 this summer.

But as it stands, the Canucks are trying to offload forwards from their roster. Not only to build assets for the future, but to give the young players on their current roster more ice time and more opportunity to see what they have in them to determine whether they are a piece of the future, or they can be an asset to use in a trade that becomes a piece to help the future.

While not deep in talent, the Canucks have Elias Pettersson, Marco Rossi, Filip Chytil, Teddy Blueger, David Kämpf, Aatu Räty, and Max Sasson as centres on the roster. Of course, Rossi, Chytil, and Blueger are currently out with injury. But the latter two appear close to returning as they are on the current road trip. Reinforcements down the middle are coming. There’s not a real positional need for Kotkaniemi anymore.

Is this not another recclamation project? The Canucks have already tried that this season with Lukas Reichel. How did that workout? Of course, Kotkaniemi has been more productive at the NHL level than Reichel has. But the situation remains the same — an underproducing forward who needs a change of scenery.

And what would Kotkaniemi cost? Whatever his price tag, the Canucks are in the business of acquiring picks and futures, not trading those for roster players now.

Nothing about the move would make sense from a Canucks perspective. The player would not be a part of the team’s future. He doesn’t exactly fit into the Canucks’ preferred age range, and they can’t make the excuse of, “well, at least he’s producing!” because he’s often a healthy scratch.

This move didn’t make sense when they thought they were contending; it doesn’t make sense now. Learn from the mistakes of trading futures for win-now veterans (Marcus Pettersson and Drew O’Connor) and let another team give Jesperi Kotkaniemi a chance to revitalize his career.

READ NEXT: Beyond gunning for a high first round pick, the Canucks’ lack of direction is hard to ignore


Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/why-vancouver-canucks-should-not-trade-jesperi-kotkaniemi
 
Scenes from morning skate: Demko starts, Karlsson and Öhgren get top six opportunities for Canucks vs. Maple Leafs

The Vancouver Canucks (16-22-5) reach the midway mark of their six-game road trip when they face the Toronto Maple Leafs (21-15-7) at Scotiabank Arena. Tonight’s game is set for a 4pm PT face-off on Hockey Night In Canada.

The Canucks are out to snap a five-game winless skid (0-3-2) while the Leafs have collected points in eight straight (6-0-2).

What we saw​

#Canucks took line rushes as follows in Toronto on Saturday morning:

DeBrusk-Pettersson-Karlsson
Öhgren-Sasson-Boeser
DOC-Kampf-Sherwood
Kane-Räty-Höglander

M. Pettersson-Hronek
Buium-Myers
D-Petey – Willander

Extras: Joseph, Bains
Red non-contact: Garland, Blueger, Chytil pic.twitter.com/w64DVpxjvk

— Thomas Drance (@ThomasDrance) January 10, 2026

After a team day off Friday, the Canucks conducted a full team morning skate in Toronto. Linus Karlsson will return to the right wing on a line with Elias Pettersson and Jake DeBrusk while Liam Öhgren bumps up to play with Max Sasson and the struggling Brock Boeser. Evander Kane, who has gone 10 games without a goal, drops to the fourth line with Aatu Räty and Nils Höglander.

On defence, the Canucks are reuniting Marcus Pettersson and Filip Hronek on a top shutdown pair. Zeev Buium will skate alongside Tyler Myers. And Elias Pettersson will remain in the line-up for a second straight game after being scratched for three of the previous four outings. He will partner with Tom Willander.

Thatcher Demko gets the start in goal. He’s looking to snap a personal five game losing skid (0-4-1). He allowed four goals on 19 shots in a 5-3 loss in Buffalo in his last outing on Tuesday. His last victory came on December 19th against the New York Islanders.

The Canucks have dropped a season-high five straight following a 5-1 loss in Detroit on Thursday. Jake DeBrusk scored on a second period power play. He has scored in back to back games and three of the last four. His last eight goals have come with the man-advantage.

One area the Canucks have had success lately is the power play which has clicked in each of its last four games and is 5/16 (31.3%) over that span. However, the Canucks have scored just four goals at 5-on-5 over their last four games. They have been outscored 5-0 in first periods in those games and have given up the first goal in eight of their last nine outings.

Two days shy of his 31st birthday, former Leaf David Kämpf returns to Toronto with two goals and an assist in 22 games since signing with Canucks in mid-November. Two of those points came in a December 30th game against Philadelphia.

Conor Garland, who has missed the past four games with an injury, rejoined the Canucks and took part in this morning’s skate. Garland along with Teddy Blueger and Filip Chytil all took to the ice in red non-contact jerseys.

The Opponent​

#Leafs morning skate:
Knies-Matthews-Domi
Maccelli-Tavares-Nylander
Cowan-Roy-Robertson
McMann-Laughton-Lorentz

Rielly-Carlo
Ekman-Larsson-Stecher
Benoit-Myers
McCabe-Benning

Woll
Hildeby

— Terry Koshan 🇺🇦 (@koshtorontosun) January 10, 2026

The Leafs are coming off a 2-1 overtime victory in Philadelphia on Thursday. Easton Cowan’s sixth goal of the season was the OT winner after Scott Laughton scored a shorthanded goal with six minutes remaining in the third period to tie the game 1-1. In addition to tying the game, Laughton also won 19 of the 20 face-offs he took. Dennis Hildeby stopped 22 of 23 shots for the win in goal. Joseph Woll gets the start in net tonight. He is 9-4-2 with a 2.69 GAA and a .916 save percentage.

The Leafs have found ways to grind out results despite missing leading scorer William Nylander for the past six games. However, Nylander will make his return to the line-up tonight. He has 41 points in 33 games.

Auston Matthews leads the team with 21 goals. He had scored six times in three games prior to being held off the scoresheet in Philadelphia. Last Saturday, he passed Mats Sundin to become the all-time goal scoring leader in Maple Leafs history with his 421st career goal. Matthews has scored 18 times in 25 games against the Canucks.

Toronto has the second best home record in the league this season going 15-5-5 (.700). The Leafs are the second highest-scoring team on home ice with 91 goals and they have won six straight at Scotiabank Arena.

The Canucks will see former teammates Oliver Ekman-Larsson and Troy Stecher on the same defensive pair on the other side tonight. However, they will not encounter familiar faces Chris Tanev or Dakota Joshua who are both out of the line-up with injuries.

News and notes​


A year ago, after winter weather in Raleigh, NC scuttled their travel plans, the Canucks flew into Toronto on game day last January and blanked the Leafs 3-0. Toronto will make its lone appearance in Vancouver three weeks from tonight on January 31st. The Canucks swept the Leafs last season, have won three straight and four of the last five meetings.

The referees for tonight’s game are Jean Hebert and Michael Markovic.

What we heard​


Adam Foote on Conor Garland’s status: “Garly’s close. He could make it by the end of this trip which would be one of the last three. So we’ll see.”

David Kämpf on returning to Toronto to face the Leafs after terminating his contract in November: “Of course, I’m excited. I have a lot of friends there on the other side. It will be an exciting game. I don’t want talk about it too much. I made a decision. I think I’m happy with my decision. I’m here and I’m just moving forward.”

Don’t forget to join Rink Wide Vancouver for full postgame coverage after this game – and every game. The livestream starts moments after the final buzzer. Rink Wide is the place for full postgame analysis and discussion. Join the live YouTube chat with your thoughts on the hockey game. Tonight’s Rink Wide will originate live on location from Greta Bar YVR.

Sponsored by bet365

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/scenes...unities-vancouver-canucks-toronto-maple-leafs
 
The Stanchies: Canucks management need to fully embrace the tank after 5-0 loss to Leafs

On its surface, the Vancouver Canucks’ 5-0 loss at the hands of the Toronto Leafs (Maple-based, according to rumours) is the perfect result for Vancouver.

It continues their thirst for first.

It continues to drive away that pesky “Hey, did you know the Blues were last place in January before winning the Cup?” response your annoying co-worker brings up any chance they get while they heat up their tuna pasta in the microwave.

And it continues to reinforce that the time to rebuild is indeed right now, because when you watch these lifeless Canucks, I don’t know how anyone walks away from these games thinking “Oh yeah, this group is a piece away from contending.” No offence to Adam Foote, who reminds us we didn’t play the game, so we wouldn’t understand how line changes work and stuff, but this was not a night in which the Canucks were “right there”. Aside from a decent opening period, the wheels on the bus fell off relatively quickly after going down 3-0 through twenty minutes.

Which is to be expected, of course. This is not a good team, and they are not built to win. If anything, this just shows how much heavy lifting Quinn Hughes was doing just to keep the Canucks in the conversation of being “right there” on a nightly basis. Someone on social media called the Canucks roster a house covered with black mould, and it’s time to tear everything down to its studs. It’s hard to argue that.

Which brings me to a sentiment I have begun to see more and more around town:

I don’t think this fan base has the constitution for a rebuild 😂😂 #Canucks

— Derek (@OhFFSDerek) January 11, 2026

This isn’t to call out Derek; it’s merely to show that, yeah, there are people who watch the fans grumble after losses like this as proof positive that this market can’t handle a rebuild. That a quick turnaround is a necessary objective for dealing with Vancouver. That people say they want a rebuild, but they don’t have the mentality to echarle huevos for a losing team.

I, however, would argue that this market does have the ability to support a rebuild; it’s just, you know, they’d just like to know it is, in fact, an actual rebuild.

Because, if we’re being honest with each other, it’s been over a decade from two management teams and the same owner, where the second this organization sniffs the tiniest scent of success, they seemingly declare the heavy lifting is over. If they get within spitting distance of the playoffs, well heck, that’s proof positive that it’s all gravy and sunshine from here on out.

Even with Jim Rutherford using the infamous “rebuild” word from Vancouver this season, that was quickly obfuscated with talk from Patrik Allvin of a “hybrid retool”, as if management couldn’t help themselves but put a foot out the door of any talk of having to wait out several losing seasons if it meant long-term success.

This team has done absolutely nothing to earn the trust of its fans, nor does it deserve it, quite frankly, which is why I think you see a lot of people watching these losses and continue to check over their shoulders for any danger. It’s hard to cheer on the losses when a small part of you is worried they’d trade next year’s first pick for a 20-something NHL-ready player.

Which isn’t to say that all rebuilds are guaranteed to work, of course. You can bring up countless stories of organizations failing to turn a team around into a consistent playoff contender. But after watching this team try for over a decade to force through short windows of opportunity only to fail to amount to anything more than a few mildly successful playoff runs, the time is ripe for a new approach. Fans are dying to see this team commit to a plan that, at least on paper, is set up to attempt long-term success.

Because ultimately, it was Vancouver hunting for short-term success that cost them the services of Quinn Hughes. Yes, the JT Miller and Elias Pettersson drama probably cost them an extra playoff run in the mix, but the window the team gave themselves when they traded for Elias Lindholm and Nikita Zadorov was destined to be a short one regardless. If there were a time machine on hand for Vancouver, I would hope they would use it to go to the day they realized Quinn Hughes was a generational defenceman and started building long-term right there and right then.

Instead, we continue this loop of watching a team and praying they lose, so the team is forced to do the right thing.

Because that’s where we are right now, the JT Miller trade tilted the scales, then Quinn Hughes demanding out forced their hands. They didn’t walk into this rebuild with open arms; they were dragged into it kicking and screaming, and in the JT Miller case, looked to have dodged a considerable contractual anchor they otherwise would have happily accepted. This is why many people aren’t fully embracing the idea that this team will be in it for the long haul: it’s been rather reactive than proactive.

Which is why I would argue it’s the organization that doesn’t have the huevos to stick to a rebuild, not the fan base. If management came out and said they were going to make moves intended to make them a long-term threat, and openly embraced the idea of short-term pain for long-term gain, it would help with these games tremendously. Right now, fans watch the games and have to pray the team loses for fear of them going on a hot streak. Because a hot streak might change their outlook at the trade deadline, that “hybrid retool” leaves a lot of room for short-term thinking.

Whether it’s the job security of management or an owner who licks his lips at the idea of playoff revenue, short-term thinking always feels like it’s lurking around the corner, peering at you from down the hallway like Joel Hofer, afraid to jump into the rebuild game.

I also just watch this team and I see the veterans struggling on the Canucks, the players who are supposed to be the reliable ones. I can’t help but wonder where their heads are at with all of this. Signing with a team that has Quinn Hughes in its back pocket is a far different beast than what they currently have, so I wonder how many of them are eying the exit door, wondering if their sweet freedom is on the way. You just watch these games and see the lack of energy, the lack of urgency, and you just pine for a world in which they trade off anything to do with the old era and start off fresh.

Because part of the joys of a rebuild is starting over. Bringing in new guys who are ready to work in a losing environment and build toward winning again. Who can play games like this where they lose, but they at least look engaged and have some pushback? An environment where a new culture can be built that hasn’t been affected by past memories. Like any relationship that runs its course, sometimes starting over is the only answer for everyone involved.

If the team fully embraces the tank, much like they once embraced the hate, I think you’d find a fan base that was able to ride out the troubled waters far better than they are now. Because trusting the process is a hell of a lot easier to do when you a) know what the process actually is and b) agree with the direction it’s going in.

Until then, let’s watch some clips.

Best not anymore
Fully on team tank for the #Canucks. Except for tonight. Tonight, as always against the Leafs, is must win night.

— Grant Notenbomer (@Gnotenbomer) January 11, 2026

I will say that I used to follow this ideology, that no matter how bad a season Vancouver has, beating the Leafs should always come first. There is just something about their fan base suffering that makes everything feel right in the universe.

But with the way this season is going, you take any loss you can get, even if it’s against Toronto. Besides, that team is dealing with its own issues of facing its own mortality right now, so beating them no longer carries that same level of satisfaction. We all float down here.

As for the game itself, the Canucks best period? The first. They handily outshot the Leafs 15-6, which, if you’re Adam Foote, you point to that and exclaim about how a bounce here or there, and this night ends differently.

However, the problem with that is most of the Canucks opposition doesn’t have God awful defensive coverage, so with 15 shots, a majority of them created using Hodor levels of creativity in the form of “throw it on net and see what happens”, doesn’t quite land the same as “Oh hey, why did Tyler Myers just skate into the corner to try and triple team a dude on the penalty kill, oh Toronto scored again.”

There is a reason Rick Tocchet probably grinded out low-scoring wins because if your team can’t score, if you at least cut out the egregious defensive zone coverage mistakes, you do in fact have a chance to win on a point shot into traffic, especially when Quinn Hughes is running on a full tank of gas and doesn’t hate his life.

A good example of this is here are two of the shots the Canucks got in the period, both of them from the stick of Nils Höglander on a wraparound attempt:

Nothing against that shot; I like the moxie, and I enjoy it whenever I see the Canucks not shooting into traffic from the point, but this is a low-percentage play. It’s a greasy goal attempt in which you hope Nils either pushes it past Joseph Woll, or that Evander Kane manages to whack it in. Which can score, of course, but when you’re a team blowing coverage and giving high danger open looks to the other team, then yeah, you kind of understand that simply outshooting your opponent doesn’t tell the full story of the night.

The Canucks best player at even strength continues to be Drew O’Connor, as we all expected, as he was the most noticeable of the Canucks from where I was sitting.

He is effective at both ends of the ice, as he is able to stop William Nylander on a back-door attempt, something the team has struggled with this season:

Whatever you want to call Adam Foote’s system, I think it’s fair to say that a lot of players on the team have struggled with it. The swarm/man-to-man nature of it lends itself to chaos in your own end if you don’t switch off properly or get lulled into chasing the puck carrier, which is something Drew made sure NOT to do on this play. He tracked back and resisted the pull of the one puck that rules them all, and as a result stayed in position to make the defensive play on the cross crease one timer attempt.

DOC also tends to provide the most noticeable energy on offensive shifts on the team, as he does here by chasing down a zone-clearing pass attempt from Toronto, before unloading a shot in the slot:

And hell, when the occasion calls for it, he’s not above trying to do a little dingle dangle as he attempted midway through the first, when he dragged a puck off the boards and tried to shoot from betwixt his legs:

I honestly came down pretty hard on Drew O’Connor in the first month of the season, but I will willingly eat my words as he has been one of the best and most consistent Canuck skaters throughout the season.

Best start late start barely
Demko StatBone:

The #Canucks haven’t scored first in 4 weeks

— Demko’s Kneebones 🇨🇦 (@BluelineBardown) January 11, 2026

Matias Maccelli opened the scoring on the power play for Toronto just eight minutes into the game on a seeing-eye pass from Willy Nylander:

The penalty kill has struggled without Derek Forbort, who I assume has entered witness protection at this point. Sometimes I wonder when the day will come when I ask about him, and the Canucks claim to have never heard of him.

But even with the services of one Mr. Forbort and/or Teddy Blueger, no team can survive with this kind of penalty kill structure. Just before the pass from Nylander, the Canucks have overloaded the boards and have three skaters outside the faceoff dots, leaving Elias Pettersson as the lone skater to try to defend two Leafs players.

Watch the clip, and you see Tyler Myers commit the most egregious act of chaos as he chases down Auston Matthews before peeling off wide and heading to the corner down low. If Nylander hadn’t found Maccelli, he could have easily found a wide-open Matthew Knies as well.

Again, this is good for the tank, but hard on the eyes at times.

Best getting your cardio in
Nice to see Pettersson shooting one timers again. It’s been a veryyyyyy long time since we’ve seen it so hopefully it’s signs for good things to come. #canucks

— David Mo (@Canuckrandom) January 11, 2026

The Canucks went 0-for-6 on the power play on the night, and to their credit, it wasn’t an egregiously bad night for them in terms of puck movement and looks on net. They managed to create some scoring chances, but I wouldn’t say they had any high-quality shots either.

They continue to find Kiefer Sherwood in the bumper spot, so depending on how the rest of the season goes regarding trades, enjoy it whilst you can:

It’s nice to see the team leaning on EP40 as a one-timer threat and distributor from the Petterzone, something that feels like it had gotten lost in time.

But like much of the night, the Leafs simply created better looks on net, as they were able to cut through the Canucks coverage at a much higher rate than Vancouver. To add insult to injury, Oliver Ekman-Larsson was technically being paid by Vancouver to make this high-level pass down low to Auston Matthews for the backhander on net:

Now, I know this might come as a surprise to some, but that was Evander Kane blowing coverage on that shift, as he drifted off the Leafs captain and skated to the point, as is tradition. Live by the Planet Ice, die by the Planet Ice, as they say.

Best team Vittorio
Time for the #Canucks to send down DPetey and bring up Mancini?

— Mike in the Valley (@mikeinthevalley) January 11, 2026

A lot of Canucks defencemen have struggled this season, and Elias Pettersson sure is one of them. I just think he makes some bad reads at times, and I don’t know if that’s the system working against him or if the spotlight on him is too bright without Quinn Hughes around to lighten the load for everyone.

I will say that the Leafs’ second goal felt like a combination of the two, as DPetey looks like he’s trying to skate back over to his side of the ice and thinks Fil Hronek is going back to the right, but then Fil pulls up, and chaos once again ensues. With both defencemen caught on the left side of the ice, Max Domi is able to skate in and snipe one past Thatcher Demko:

I find that the Adam Foote system feels like a house of cards, where one mistake can bring the whole thing down with little effort. Players will chase a puck or decide to keep tracking a player out of position, and then everything falls apart as the team cannot figure out how to get back into man-on-man coverage.

Feels very high risk, low reward, which feels not optimal?

Best finishing strong
That was a period of hockey that the last place team in the league would play..What a mess lol#Canucks

— JR#11 (@JDOG0721) January 11, 2026

The Leafs would then make it 3-0 off a Steven Lorentz pass over to Willy Nylander, with a lone Marcus Pettersson spinning into space behind him:

This is life when you don’t have a defenceman who can generate zone entries at will, as Tom Willander skates in and forces a pass into the middle, before bouncing into the middle of the ice for Lorentz to start the counterattack. Marcus Pettersson is playing pretty high up on the back check, and when he can’t make a play on the puck, he gets spun around, like a record baby right round round round, giving Nylander all the time and space to skate the puck around Demko.

Which, to my earlier point, it’s nice that Vancouver outshot the Leafs in the opening frame, but at the end of the day, there was only one team making the big mistakes on their in-zone coverage, so yeah, shock of shocks, it was Vancouver who was down three goals as a result of it.

Best see you next year
Demko gets the hook after allowing 3 goals on 6 shots. Commitment to #teamtank. #Canucks

— Chris Leader (@cleader38) January 11, 2026

Thatcher Demko did not return to the game due to a lower-body injury, and, according to Adam Foote, he will be evaluated over the next few days. Which means I assume he will get the dreaded “day to day” diagnosis, and the next time we see him will be in the year 2027 with a new name, new haircut, and new life somewhere in Cabo San Lucas.

The change in nets didn’t change all that much, as once again Marcus Pettersson showed his commitment to the Dead or Alive lifestyle by spinning once more, this time after Easton Cowan (no relation to the Brabarian, but yes relation to Darren McCarty) walked around him and narrowly missed banking in a pass attempt behind Kevin Lankinen:

The Canucks defensive coverage continued to struggle, as this time they stacked three players down low, while Brock Boeser and Liam Öhgren stood in the middle of the ice, leading to Nicholas Robertson getting off an open one-timer in the slot:

That shot very easily could have made it 4-0 had it not been for a big save from Lankinen. Which, again, it’s created because the Canucks just constantly break down in their own zone, which gives up so much time and space for the other team.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, the Leafs were winning the physical war as Brandon Carlo would then lay out Jake DeBrusk with a crushing hit in the neutral zone, much to the dismay of the Romulans:

My takeaway remains the same as ever: sell, sell, sell at the trade deadline.

Best rolling over
The number of grade A chances the #Canucks give up on the PP is insane

— Ethan (@Lindstrum) January 11, 2026

With the Canucks on the power play, it was Scott Laughton with the best chance, as he got a breakaway and attempted his vintage piss missile shot:

Tom Willander pinches up along the boards and gets beaten, which results in Laughton getting the scoring chance. And while some people may doubt the usage of a slapshot on a breakaway, I absolutely love it.

One, it’s primal as sh!t, because if you wire a 99mph clapper behind a goalie, you’ve let them know you are the superior being in a way a regular wrist shot can’t.

Two, Lankinen is basically Hasek in shootouts, so you might as well get creative in trying to beat him.

The Leafs would get another high-quality scoring chance on the same penalty kill, as Auston Matthews got a couple of shots off after an ill-advised Evander Kane pinch from the point:

To the Canucks credit, all five skaters get back to try and limit the damage, but right after Matthews gets his initial shot off, they all peel off to one side of the ice, leaving two Leafs players all alone on the right of Kevin. It’s sort of how this season has gone, the road to scoring chances is paved with good intentions and all that.

As for the Canucks, they had a couple of good scoring chances on the power play that were either stopped by Woll, or in Boeser’s case, the hockey gods currently hate him:

The pushback was few and far between in this one, however.

Best not like this
O'Connor 💔

— akui 🍋🟩 (@didntkiss234) January 11, 2026

Drew O’Connor got his leg stuck in the ice and left the game briefly before returning. I will show a clip of it for posterity, just in case he, too, is listed as “day-to-day” tomorrow due to this, and we don’t see him again for many months:

Best finishing up
This is so embarrassing #canucks

— hammertime (@nucksEP40) January 11, 2026

John Tavares got the Leafs fourth goal, this time after the Canucks just couldn’t clear the zone to save their lives. Not to bring up Hughes again, but I do want to point out that there is such a stark difference in life when you have a zone entry/exit God, versus when you’re a regular human:

The Leafs put the pressure on Vancouver, and they just couldn’t find a way to get the puck out, and as a result, Toronto went up by four.

And much like the earlier Carlo hit, the Leafs towered over Vancouver physically once more, this time when Max Domi beat up Marcus Pettersson near the end of the second period:

You just watch these games, and everything is just so incredibly flat right now. I find myself looking up 1995 Ottawa Senators highlights to cheer myself at times, because at least they had the excitement of Lance Pitlick to watch.

Best more of the same
everyone’s asking me to turn this game off and I keep refusing and now I’m the only one left in the living room watching it

#Canucks

— em tweets 🫧 (@empathytweets_) January 11, 2026

The third period was essentially a gentleman’s agreement between both teams to finish up the game in a timely manner, though Nylander almost got another goal when he pushed a puck wide of an open net:

Again, the Canucks defensive coverage is looser than that meat sandwich you used to eat in high school. Such is life.

Best line of the night

I suggest you stop fighting the fact that David Kämpf, Kiefer Sherwood and Drew O’Connor are the top line on the Canucks and simply embrace it. Worry about the implications of that another day.

For now, let us revel in Kämpf knowing that the best player to try and get the puck to right now is one Drew O’Connor, as he is your best even strength player on the team right now:

This was one of the best scoring chances of the third period, and once again, I urge you not to ponder the implications of that, but instead enjoy the beauty of it.

Best dying gasps
#canucks are NOT 'right there'.

— VanCity Sports (@vancitysportswx) January 11, 2026

With a late-game power play, Vancouver tried their vaunted “maybe it will go in off of Jake DeBrusk?” maneuver, followed up by the “maybe if we throw it in the crease someone will whack it in?” strategy:

Both fair choices, but both ultimately failed on this night.

Best shout out to Aatu
can’t wait until Foote pulls the goalie with seven minutes to go and we get instantly scored on 😮‍💨 #canucks

— Jisho (@glen_nelson) January 11, 2026

Just wanted to highlight that Aatu Räty probably played the cleanest rush defence on the night, as he easily shut down and contained John Tavares on this attempt in the third period:

Evander Kane then almost set up Aatu Räty for a goal, as Räty utilized the deft tip technique, nearly getting one past Woll:

For all of Planet Ice’s defensive issues, I will say I enjoy watching him make leading passes. Evander Kane might be the best player on the team now in terms of sending in passes for other players to skate into.

As for Aatu Räty, with his faceoff prowess alone, I wouldn’t take him out of the lineup anytime soon. You might as well see what you have in the young kids, and it’s clear that putting the current group of veterans into every game isn’t exactly creating a winning, zoned-in environment.

Best signs of a pulse
I miss Jim Benning. #Canucks

— Shiippai (@Shiippaii) January 11, 2026

The only real pushback on the night came from, who else, Kiefer Sherwood, who didn’t like the late hit attempt on David Kämpf:

Sherwood was penalized for it, and Toronto would get its final goal of the night on the power play:

I cannot think of a more depressing sight in the NHL right now than Brock Boeser killing off a penalty in a blowout game. It just feels so needlessly sad.

Still, kudos to Sherwood for being one of the few players who seemed to notice and/or dislike the fact that his team was losing. Probably bumps his trade value up to two first-rounders, I would think.

And that was the ball game. Toronto wins. Vancouver loses. And we continue to wait and see where this ride takes us.

See you Tuesday. Go Bills.

PRESENTED BY VIVID SEATS




Take $20 off your first Vivid Seats order of $200+ using promo code CANUCKSARMY (new customers only, $200 USD minimum before taxes & fees)

Source: https://canucksarmy.com/news/stanch...lly-embrace-tank-5-0-loss-toronto-maple-leafs
 
Back
Top