News Packers Team Notes

Green Bay Packers News: Packers likely to roll out JV unit in week 18

imagn-27893504.jpg


You know that disorienting sensation where you’re watching the Packers late in the season and suddenly a player you’ve literally never heard — and who you could be reasonably convinced doesn’t actually exist — makes a play?

Get ready to feel that sensation a lot on Sunday.

With the Packers playoff seeding already locked in, Head Coach Matt LaFleur has hinted that key starters will sit out this Sunday’s matchup to protect health ahead of the postseason. And while many of us have been mailing it in at our jobs the last week or two, Green Bay’s front office has been busy reshaping its roster for the finale, making more than a dozen roster changes and elevating multiple players from the practice squad to the active roster.

There is a non-zero chance that the only quarterbacks taking the field for the Packers will be Clayton Tune and the newly acquired Desmond Ridder. Yeah, that Desmond Ridder. Sarcasm aside, it makes sense not to risk Jordan Love, and Malik Willis is also nursing a shoulder injury.

Meanwhile, there have been several practice-squad elevations and new additions like Damien Martinez, Jonathan Ford (old friend alert) and Trevon Diggs.

We’ve yet to learn anything about possible sits and starts for wide receivers, but given LaFleur’s past experience with losing key players in meaningless games, it stands to reason that players like Christian Watson could see little to no action.

At any rate, if ever there were a game to turn your brain off and simply try to just enjoy the football, it’s this one. The outcome won’t matter, and getting out injury free would be the only victory worth celebrating. And if you squint, it might even look like a real football game!

ICYMI: Packers roster moves ahead of season finale – Justis Mosqueda tracks all the roster moves and new additions as the Packers get ready to play a meaningless season ender.

Jonathan Ford, once discarded, is needed now – In more than two seasons with the Packers, Jonathan Ford didn’t play a single snap. He may have a key role for the rest of this season.

Can Trevon Diggs prop up injured cornerback room? – Green Bay addressed their injury-rattled cornerback room on Wednesday by claiming former All-Pro Trevon Diggs off waivers.

ICYMI: What the Packers’ salary cap situation could look like in 2026 – It’s safe to assume that the Green Bay Packers will not sign a meaningful free agent this offseason.

Fireworks fraud strikes again – Hundreds of people turned up to a fake New Year’s Eve fireworks display for the second year in a row despite police warnings of no such event existing.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...packers-likely-to-roll-out-jv-unit-in-week-18
 
Packers Injury Report Update: 2 more players drop out of practice

gettyimages-2249601395.jpg


The Green Bay Packers have had terrible injury luck this year. Not only are 15 players on the injury lists for the team, but two more players became non-participants in practice on Thursday in their lead-up to their regular-season finale against the Minnesota Vikings.

Today, offensive lineman Donovan Jennings was added to the injury report with a throat injury. On Wednesday, he was a full participant, which likely means that he wasn’t injured during yesterday’s practice. Usually, if Jennings had started practice, gotten injured and dropped out, he would have been listed as limited in that situation.

Receiver Savion Williams, who was a limited participant with a foot/illness designation, was a non-participant on Thursday. Williams has been dealing with a foot issue for virtually the entire regular season.

Fellow receiver Dontayvion Wicks (concussion) has also been a non-participant in back-to-back practices. On top of that, these players have been limited this week:

  • QB Malik Willis (right shoulder/hamstring)
  • RB Josh Jacobs (knee/ankle)
  • WR Jayden Reed (illness)
  • LG Aaron Banks (illness/ankle)
  • RT Zach Tom (back/knee)
  • OL John Williams (back – PUP)
  • DE Lukas Van Ness (illness/foot)
  • LB Edgerrin Cooper (shoulder)
  • LB Nick Niemann (pectoral – IR)

The Packers have already stated that while Jordan Love (concussion) has been cleared for action, it will be Clayton Tune who will be starting against the Vikings this week. Running backs coach Ben Sirmens also said on Thursday that the team is not planning on playing Jacobs. Meanwhile, defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley said that he hopes to get cornerback Trevon Diggs on the field versus Minnesota, but he isn’t sure if Diggs will be ready to play in a new system by Sunday.

Good luck making sense of Green Bay’s roster going into Week 18’s action. The Packers will basically be playing a preseason game with a 48-man roster instead of a 91-man roster. Don’t be surprised if there are more transactions made later this week, as the team tries to put themselves in a position to sit as many starters as possible with their odd roster situation. So far, the team has made 17 moves this week.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...rt-update-2-more-players-drop-out-of-practice
 
Packers vs. Vikings Week 18 TV Broadcast Map

usa_today_10274645.jpg


Maybe it’s for the best that the Green Bay Packers’ regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings this Sunday will only be on television in a small selection of TV markets across the United States. After all, the average football fan probably isn’t all that excited to tune in for a starting quarterback matchup featuring Clayton Tune vs. Max Brosmer, particularly when the game has no impact on anything aside from draft position.

That’s the situation facing the Packers and Vikings this Sunday when the two teams face off at 12 Noon Central Time from U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis. Sunday’s game will be televised on CBS as one of three games on the network in the early window, joining Bengals-Browns and Colts-Texans.

Unlike the other two games, the Indianapolis-Houston game does have some playoff implications. The Texans are in a 3-way tie for the Wild Card spots in the AFC and they still have a chance to win the AFC South if they get a win on Sunday and see the Jacksonville Jaguars lose to the Tennessee Titans. Houston would end up as the 3 seed if that happens, but they are already guaranteed at worst a Wild Card spot and could occupy any of the 5, 6, or 7 seeds depending on other results.

As for Bengals-Browns, well, that one is just for bragging rights up I-71 in Ohio.

Here’s the map for the CBS early games on Sunday, with Packers-Vikings shown in blue:

18-CBS-E-V2.png

Essentially, the only markets set to see Packers-Vikings are those covering the NFC North footprint, covering Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, northern Illinois and Iowa, and the Dakotas. Also, the Philadelphia market gets the game, as the Eagles might end up playing the Packers in the Wild Card round next week if certain results break right (namely, the Eagles winning and the Chicago Bears losing on Sunday).

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...1/packers-vs-vikings-week-18-tv-broadcast-map
 
Former Packers OL receives $51 million extension

gettyimages-1337358724.jpg


The 2021 NFL Draft is a class that Green Bay Packers fans want to forget. While there was some value added that year, with T.J. Slaton being taken 173rd overall and Isaiah McDuffie going 220th, the fact that the team took Josh Myers and Amari Rodgers in the top 100 selections of that draft outweighs the positives. A player that the Packers took and who you might have forgotten about, though, is offensive lineman Cole Van Lanen.

Van Lanen was picked 214th overall (a sixth-round selection) out of Wisconsin that year. He spent all of his rookie year on the Packers’ practice squad, but he did get on the field for one snap in 2021 as a gameday elevation.

The next summer, the Packers sent Van Lanen to the Jacksonville Jaguars for a 2023 seventh-round pick, a selection that Green Bay eventually used on safety Anthony Johnson Jr., who played 12 games and made four starts with the 2023 Packers before Johnson was waiver claimed by the New York Giants at the cutdown deadline in 2024.

Van Lanen only started three games for the Jaguars on his rookie deal, all in the final year of his deal in 2024, but was re-signed to the team in 2025 on a one-year, $3.4 million contract. This year, though, Van Lanen finally had a major breakout as a 27-year-old fifth-year lineman.

He’s displaced Walker Little, a 2021 second-round pick, as the team’s starting left tackle and has recorded nine starts in 2025. On Friday night, ESPN’s Adam Schefter broke the news that Van Lanen and the Jaguars reached an agreement on a three-year, $51 million extension that can rise up to $55.5 million ($18.5 million per) with incentives.

Generally, the thought around the league is that the price of full-time starting tackles is around $20 million, following the deal that Dan Moore Jr. received from the Tennessee Titans this offseason, despite the fact that he led the NFL in sacks allowed in 2024. This is why Packers left tackle Rasheed Walker will probably end up netting the team a 2027 fourth-round compensatory pick once he hits free agency this offseason.

Van Lanen, who has started just 12 games in five seasons, falls just a little shy of that $20 million per year mark. Welcome to the NFL in 2025. As a reminder, Zach Tom signed a $22 million per year extension this offseason, which is looking better by the day.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...rmer-packers-ol-receives-51-million-extension
 
Packers Injury Report: Four players ruled out against Vikings

gettyimages-2191787158.jpg


The Green Bay Packers are expected to shut down several key players for Sunday’s regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings, but in order to do so they may need to call up a few more players from their practice squad. Friday’s final injury report delivered the news that four players are ruled out for Sunday’s game and a fifth is doubtful, though only three of the five are currently on the 53-man roster.

Those three players are offensive lineman Donovan Jennings (out, throat), wideout Savion Williams (out, foot/illness), and receiver Dontayvion Wicks (doubtful, concussion). Wicks should have up to game time to try to clear the concussion protocol, but that appears to be unlikely as he was unable to practice at all this week while trying to return from the injury he suffered last Saturday.

The other two players listed as out are linebacker Nick Niemann (pectoral) and offensive lineman John Williams (back), both of whom are working to return from injured lists. Niemann is trying to make a return from injured reserve, while Williams has not played all season, instead spending 2025 on the PUP list.

Meanwhile, the Packers also listed a pair of players as questionable with injuries: quarterback Malik Willis (listed with right shoulder and hamstring issues) and starting right tackle Zach Tom (back/knee). However, that means that several other starters who were on the injury report during the week are good to go — if the Packers’ coaches elect to give them any playing time.

The group of players who were limited during practices at some point in the week include Aaron Banks, Edgerrin Cooper, Josh Jacobs, Jordan Love, Jayden Reed, and Lukas Van Ness. However, none of these players has an injury designation for the game and only Banks and Van Ness were limited in Friday’s practice.

Minnesota, on the other hand, will be without a pair of starters on offense, including an old friend. Running back Aaron Jones will not play on Sunday after being ruled out with a hip injury, and his season will wrap up with just 548 rushing yards and two touchdowns. Jones will be joined in street clothes by starting tight end T.J. Hockenson and one of his backups, Gavin Bartholomew, as well as reserve receiver and return man Myles Price.

The big news for the Vikings is that quarterback J.J. McCarthy is off the injury report and is expected to start on Sunday despite a right hand injury. McCarthy was able to practice fully on Thursday and will be under center despite the game having no impact for the postseason for either team.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...report-four-players-ruled-out-against-vikings
 
The Ravens runs that sealed the Packers’ fate

gettyimages-2253758055.jpg


In Week 17, the Green Bay Packers’ run defense gave up 5.8 yards per carry to Derrick Henry, Tyler Huntley, and Keaton Mitchell, with the bulk of the damage being done by Henry’s 216 rushing yards. In our first article this week, we covered how efficient their run game was in the first half on early down runs.

In the second half, the Baltimore Ravens’ run game was not nearly as successful, but the Packers’ defense gave up 55 yards and one touchdown on two carries that proved pivotal in the outcome. The first, a 30-yard run that put the Ravens on the Packers’ side of the 50-yard line, happened when the Packers were down three points late in the 3rd quarter (27-24).

It came courtesy of a strong side outside zone running play. Up to this point, the Ravens had mostly run lead inside zone with some gap scheme sprinkled in there. When the defense tightened its alignments and loaded the box, the Ravens shifted gears and got to the perimeter.

The Packers were loaded up to the weakside, expecting the Ravens’ weakside inside zone run here. Instead, the Ravens ran a strong side lead outside zone away from the meat of the defense.

View Link

This outside zone run is designed to attack the perimeter of the strong side.

Ravens 2 back wide zone strong pic.twitter.com/dXuxXsRMhu

— Forbidden Tape (@forbiddenall22) January 2, 2026

The addition of the fullback gives the offense an extra gap and blocker to the strong side.

Here, the Ravens have five blockers to four defenders, and all Henry has to do is make the safety, Javon Bullard coming down to fill the alley, and he misses the tackle. Bullard whiffs, and Henry gets to the sideline and gains 30 yards.

The next play sealed the win for the Ravens with just over two minutes left in the game. At this point, it was 34-2,4 and what little hope the Packers had to get the ball back and quickly score was stomped out on this 25-yard touchdown run by Henry.

View Link

Much like the first play above, the Ravens are running two back outside zone, but are running it to the open side this time (weak side, no tight end).

Ravens 2 back wide zone weak (25 yard touchdown) pic.twitter.com/jRwUpNereI

— Forbidden Tape (@forbiddenall22) January 2, 2026

This is really just a good play call that beats the scheme. The Packers have six defenders for six blockers on one side and five defenders for five blockers on the other side, meaning no matter which way the offense runs the ball, getting a stop is going to be dependent on whether a defender can win their rep and disrupt the blocking.

That didn’t happen here. The Ravens’ blockers go hat for hat and open a lane for Henry to go untouched. The last line of defense on the perimeter is the cornerback Carrington Valentine, and he has to take on the fullback. Valentine would normally turn the run back inside, but there’s no one on the edge, as that player should be Rashan Gary.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/.../the-ravens-runs-that-sealed-the-packers-fate
 
LOL oh man the Packers are an absolute MESS right now and I am HERE FOR IT 😂

A throat injury?? How do you even get a throat injury at football practice?? Did Jennings try to swallow a football or something?? That's gotta be one of the weirdest injury designations I've seen in a while.

But seriously though, 15 players on injury lists plus more dropping out... that's rough even by late season standards. And they're basically punting this game against the Vikings anyway with Clayton Tune starting over a cleared Jordan Love. Smart move honestly - no point risking your franchise QB in a meaningless game.

The Cole Van Lanen story is pretty wild though. Dude goes from practice squad guy to getting $51 million from Jacksonville?? Good for him honestly. Shows you never know how careers are gonna shake out. The Packers got a 7th rounder for him that turned into Anthony Johnson Jr who isn't even on the team anymore, so that trade worked out for exactly nobody in Green Bay lmao.

And that Ravens tape breakdown... yikes. Derrick Henry absolutely HOUSED them. 216 rushing yards is embarrassing no matter how you slice it. Bullard whiffing on that tackle in the open field is the kind of play that haunts you. That run defense has been sus all year and Henry exposed it completely.

At least we don't gotta worry about playing these guys in the playoffs! 🦬
 
Barryn Sorrell looks like a legitimate DE for the Packers

imagn-27931317.jpg


In a game that Green Bay Packers fans will quickly forget, rookie defensive end Barryn Sorrell showed enough flashes to suggest that he’ll have a real role for this team in the coming weeks and years.

Despite the 16-3 loss, Sorrell filled the stat sheet for the Packers, finishing the game with eight total tackles, five solo, one sack, one tackle for loss, a quarterback hit, and a fumble recovery. Preliminary PFF data also credited Sorrell with three pressures.

Brenton Cox Jr with the strip sack and fumble recovered by Barryn Sorrell 💪🏽🏈🧀 pic.twitter.com/nO3oSQy0pO

— Packerfan Total Access- Clayton (@packers_access) January 4, 2026

That kind of performance is something that the Packers coaching staff will likely be evaluating heavily this week to see if the fourth-round rookie could be a legitimate contributor in the playoffs.

Even with the return of Lukas Van Ness, the Packers have had few pass-rushing answers since Micah Parsons tore his ACL against the Denver Broncos. In fact, Sorrell’s sack was a rarity for the Packers defense lately, as Quay Walker’s zero-yard sack was the only other one that Green Bay has generated since the December 7th win over the Chicago Bears.

Sorrell has earned the opportunity to get snaps for this Packers defense, especially with how poorly Rashan Gary has played in recent months. Acme Packing Company’s own rcon14 laid out why the Packers should make Gary a healthy scratch for the playoffs, and Sorrell now having more sacks than Gary since November is further evidence that a change needs to be made with the team’s pass-rush rotation.

Beyond the playoffs, Sorrell might end up being a key rotational EDGE for the Packers in 2026 and beyond. Parsons and Van Ness are likely to be their starting EDGEs going forward, with Gary almost certainly being a cap casualty this offseason. According to Over the Cap, the Packers would save nearly $11 million in cap space by cutting Gary before June 1.

Sorrell may have been a Day 3 pick, but the former Texas pass rusher has flashed enough in 2025 that he should see an uptick in snaps in the playoffs and become a real contributor for the defense in 2026 and beyond.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...ll-looks-like-a-legitimate-de-for-the-packers
 
Packers Playoffs: Bears kickoff time set for the wild card round

gettyimages-2253177156.jpg


The Green Bay Packers and Chicago Bears will be facing off in the wild-card round for the NFL’s Saturday night game. The game will be broadcast on Prime Video, similar to the league’s Thursday Night Football slate. Those in the Packers market will be able to get the game on NBC 26 (Green Bay) or FOX 6 (Milwaukee). For out-of-market fans, though, at least outside of Chicagoland, you’re going to need the subscription service or watch the game (free) on Prime Video’s Twitch channel.

Below is the full playoff schedule for the wild card round:

Saturday, January 10th​

  • 3:30 pm CT – Los Angeles Rams @ Carolina Panthers (FOX/FOX One)
  • 7 pm CT – Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears (Prime Video/Twitch)

Sunday, January 11th​

  • 12 pm CT – Buffalo Bills @ Jacksonville Jaguars (CBS/Paramount+)
  • 3:30 pm CT – San Francisco 49ers @ Philadelphia Eagles (FOX/FOX One)
  • 7 pm CT – Los Angeles Chargers @ New England Patriots (NBC/Peacock)

Monday, January 12th​

  • 7 pm CT – Houston Texans @ Pittsburgh Steelers (ESPN/ABC/ESPN App)

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...ears-kickoff-time-set-for-the-wild-card-round
 
The Packers and Bears have only met in the playoffs twice before

gettyimages-108274513.jpg


The Green Bay Packers and Chicago Bears have the most storied rivalry in the sport, even if it has been extremely lopsided since 2009, when the Packers began a run of 29 wins over the Bears in 35 games. It’s the most-played game in NFL history, with Green Bay being up 109-97-6 all-time in the series, and features the teams with the most championships and most Hall of Famers in professional football.

So, would it surprise you if you learned that this is only the third time that the two squads have faced off in the postseason? I came across that stat this week, was surprised that it was accurate. In fact, the Packers and Bears have only even been in the playoffs together at the same time (not even as opponents) five times before 2025. A lot of that has to do with the fact that Green Bay has dominated the rivalry since the merger, which is the era when multiple teams from the same division have gotten the most opportunities to participate in the playoffs in the same season.

So with all that being laid out, I want to take a look back at the previous two Bears-Packers games in postseason history. There was a 70-year gap between the first and second games, but it’s only taken 16 years between the second and third games with win-or-go-home circumstances in this rivalry.

1941​


The year was 1941, and things were very different than how you imagine the NFL right now. The Bears had just come off a 73-0 victory in the NFL Championship Game the year before, when they rode a new offensive innovation, the T formation, to success. Despite having a title-winning year, Chicago held the first overall pick of that season’s draft.

If you want an example of how odd these seasons were for the league, the Bears spent that first overall pick on Tom Harmon, who turned down the opportunity to play in the NFL to pursue a career in acting. Later in 1941, he signed a deal with the New York Americans of the American Football League, the third of four leagues that would hold that name — the final being what eventually turned into the AFC after the AFL-NFL merger.

Shortly after his professional football career started, though, Harmon was drafted to fight in World War II. When his stint in the military was over, he eventually played for the NFL’s Los Angeles Rams, six years after he was drafted by the Bears. After breaking his nose 13 times in three seasons of pro football, Harmon retired from the sport entirely.

Alright, with that picture painted, here are the circumstances that led to the first Packers-Bears playoff matchup. The NFL used to just play the regular season and then an NFL Championship Game, a matchup between the best team from the Western Division (Bears, Packers, Detroit Lions, Chicago Cardinals and Cleveland Rams) against the best team from the Eastern Division.

When both the Packers and Bears finished 10-1 with a 7-1 divisional record, as Green Bay won in City Stadium and Chicago won at Wrigley Field in the regular season, the league stepped in and forced the two sides to play a sort of play-in game to decide who got the chance to play the Eastern Division leader in the NFL Championship Game.

To decide who got to host the game, there was a coin flip, which George Halas’ Bears won. A week before the first non-championship playoff game in NFL history, Pearl Harbor was attacked, which impacted the attendance for both this playoff game and the NFL Championship Game.

To start the game, Chicago returner Hugh Callarneau fumbled the ball, which led to a Packers score. Callarneau fumbled the second kickoff, too, but the Bears didn’t lose possession on their second attempt. Later on in the first quarter, Callarneau was the first Chicago player to score a touchdown, on an 81-yard return, that cut Green Bay’s lead to 7-6. Redemption.

From there on out, the Bears went on a 33-7, won the game and then won the NFL Championship the week later. The Packers were held to just 33 yards on 36 carries while Chicago’s T formation produced 277 yards on the ground on 48 rushes. The Bears only passed for 48 yards in the game, while Green Bay collectively went 11 of 27 passing for 222 yards, a touchdown and two interceptions with Cecil Isbell, Tony Canadeo and Hal Van Every throwing the football.

2010​


Fast forward 70 years later and the Packers had another rubber match with the Bears in what would ultimately be (spoiler alert) Green Bay’s lone Super Bowl-winning season since 1996.

Earlier in 2010, the Packers lost a one-score game to Chicago at Soldier Field on Monday Night Football in Week 3, when Green Bay set a franchise-record for penalties with 18. In Week 17, the regular-season finale, the Bears, who had nothing to play for seeding-wise, didn’t rest their starters against the Packers, who needed a win to advance into the postseason as the NFC’s sixth and final seed. Green Bay won that game 10-3 at Lambeau Field, despite never having a lead until the fourth quarter of the game.

After beating the Philadelphia Eagles and Atlanta Falcons, the Packers got another opportunity to play the Bears in the NFC Championship Game.

Green Bay scored on the opening drive of the game and running back James Starks punched in another early touchdown to give the Packers a 14-0 lead. Just before halftime, Bears quarterback Jay Cutler went down with an injury, which forced backup Todd Collins to come into the game.

After starting the second half with three straight three-and-out drives, Collins was pulled in favor of a third quarterback, Caleb Hanie, who actually drove Chicago 67 yards for a touchdown to cut the lead to 14-7 on his first drive under center. Two drives later, though, Hanie threw his infamous interception to Green Bay nose tackle B.J. Raji, who took it to the house to give the Packers a 21-7 lead.

Never forget when BJ Raji called game on the Bears with a pick six to send the Packers to Super Bowl XLV pic.twitter.com/UmirYSRcdy

— SleeperPackers (@SleeperPackers) December 3, 2025

The Bears didn’t just roll over and die there, though. Hanie kept fighting and actually posted a 60-yard touchdown drive that took off just 1:21 of the clock, making it a one-score game again at 21-14.

The Packers got the ball back with 4:38 left in the game, but went three-and-out on a drive that actually lost a yard. Chicago got the ball back with the opportunity to tie the game, against all odds.

The NFC Championship was ultimately decided by a fourth-and-five play with only 47 seconds left on the clock, when cornerback Sam Shields picked off Hanie for Hanie’s second interception of the game. From there, Green Bay just knelt out the game and advanced to Super Bowl XLV, where they would beat the Pittsburgh Steelers.

This was your history lesson of the day. The Bears still suck.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...rs-have-only-met-in-the-playoffs-twice-before
 
Adam Schefter: Packers’ priority is to extend Matt LaFleur, Brian Gutekunst

gettyimages-1778504021.jpg


As we inch closer toward the end of the Green Bay Packers’ season, it seems more and more clear that Packers president and CEO Ed Policy plans to bring both head coach Matt LaFleur and general manager Brian Gutekunst back in 2026, despite electing not extend either in his first summer as the pseudo-owner of the team.

In his column to start the new year on Packers.com, Policy stated that he was “extremely proud” of the 2025 team and noted that the squad battled through injuries this year. As of now, Green Bay has 17 players on the injured reserve or physically unable to perform lists, after changing over their training staff in 2024. In Week 18 alone, the Packers’ front office had to make 23 roster moves just to field a team against the Minnesota Vikings in a game that had no consequence on Green Bay’s playoff standing.

Before that post, ESPN’s Rob Demovsky stated that he believes the Packers will go back to the team’s “old structure,” where the head coach directly reports to the general manager, instead of the head coach and general manager both reporting to the president/CEO independently. This, obviously, would be a pretty big boost for Gutekunst, who Demovsky claimed he assumes will be the GM in 2026.

So now that we’ve set this table, here’s what ESPN’s Adam Schefter had to say about LaFleur’s situation on Monday:

“I think the bigger deal is, can they figure out a contract of fair value to keep him there? I think that’s what this is about, them trying to negotiate a contract, seeing what they could come up with. If they get a deal done, it’s a non-talking point and his future is secure there. If they can’t figure out a contract that works for both sides, well then, you have to ask yourself, are they willing to let him go into the last year of his deal, which he would be, or what do you do about that?

Very rarely do teams want coaches going into the last year of their deal. Which, I believe the priority will be to re-sign to an extension this offseason.”

Schefter also added that he expects Gutekunst to receive a contract extension, too.

The way information is trickling out, it seems like Policy never really put LaFleur and Gutekunst on the hot seat. First of all, I’ve been told that Gutekunst’s job was never on the line this year, and the issue was really an extension for LaFleur — and what the optics would look like if you extended one and not the other. Secondly, it seems like Policy likes the idea of LaFleur being the head coach, based on Schefter’s comments, but is simply balking at the price of business of extending NFL head coaches in this era.

This…is unfortunately a common trope in Green Bay. Sometimes the team hires a pricey coordinator or two, but rarely, from conversations I’ve had with people in the league, does the team have an expensive coaching staff as a whole.

Let’s go through a couple of examples.

When LaFleur was hired, he was a one-year play-caller for a 2018 Tennessee Titans team that went 9-7 and finished third in the AFC South. When the Packers brought him in as head coach, he was paid $5 million per year, which is on the low scale for first-time head coaches at the NFL level (Chicago’s Ben Johnson is making $13 million per year, for example). For perspective, 47 coaches were making $5 million or more at the college level in 2025, including programs like Liberty, a member of Conference USA — whose conference champion, Kennesaw State, played in the Myrtle Beach Bowl this year.

I was also told that part of the condition of LaFleur taking over as head coach in 2019 was that the deal was that he had to accept that the team was going to keep Mike Pettine’s defensive staff, as the team didn’t have the appetite for paying all of those coaching buyouts just to turn around and pay for a second staff (NFL coaching contracts are structurally guaranteed).

Once you’ve wrapped your mind around that, you can look up the Packers’ recent coaching staff changes and note the types of coaches who end up backfilling for when Green Bay’s coaches leave for promotions elsewhere. Hint: They’re usually cheap internal promotions.

For example, the Packers’ current receivers coach, Ryan Mahaffey, was promoted from his previous role on the team when Jason Vrable, previously the receivers coach, began serving as the passing game coordinator full-time in 2024. Mahaffey’s previous job? Assistant offensive line coach, a role under Luke Butkus.

While NFL coaching salaries aren’t public (and I can never get a clear answer why agents don’t want to drive up the prices with the media the same way they do with players, other than “that’s just not industry standard”), the one thing I’ve been told over and over again (and written about here for years) is that the general vibes in Green Bay is not to go out and spend money on coaches when the staff shakes up, but rather ask who the next man up is for a cheaper internal promotion option.

LaFleur’s first special teams coordinator? Shawn Mennenga, who had only spent one year as a special teams coordinator in his career, a season at Vanderbilt, before taking the job. After that, it was Maurice Drayton, an internal promotion from the Mennenga staff after Mennenga was fired. It took hiring a third special teams coordinator in LaFleur’s first four years for the Packers to accept that they needed to spend at the position, which they did when they hired Rich Bisaccia. As a reminder, it’s been widely reported that Darren Rizzi, currently the assistant head coach and special teams coordinator of the AFC’s top-ranked Denver Broncos, was willing to take the Packers’ job on LaFleur’s first staff, but the team low-balled him. Mennenga was cheaper.

Offensively, the team has been pretty cheap for coaches across the board in the LaFleur era, mostly relying on internal promotions and the development of young coaches in their system. Defensively, the team will spend, but only after learning a hard lesson, like post-Joe Barry when the Packers bought defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley, a sitting college football head coach, a very well-respected linebackers coach in Anthony Campanile, who is now the defensive coordinator with the Jacksonville Jaguars, and Derrick Ansley, currently Green Bay’s defensive passing game coordinator who was the Los Angeles Chargers’ defensive coordinator in 2023.

In 2025, they even hired DeMarcus Covington, formerly the New England Patriots’ defensive coordinator, to make up for the mistake of continuously keeping Jerry Montgomery, who survived three different defensive coordinator firings, on the staff as their defensive line coach and replacing him with an internal promotion of Jason Rebrovich. Montgomery is currently the defensive line coach of the Cincinnati Bengals, who rank 30th in defensive DVOA this year, while Rebrovich is the assistant defensive line coach (the assistant to the assistant coach) with the Buffalo Bills.

(Side note: All of this cheap internal hiring is why I expect one of Ansley or Covington to be Hafley’s successor in Green Bay, if he ever leaves for a head coaching opportunity.)

I could list more examples here (Joe Barry wasn’t a hot candidate in 2021 when the Packers had to pay a new defensive coordinator after buying out Mike Pettine), but I won’t (MIKE HOLMGREN LEFT A YEAR AFTER GOING TO BACK-TO-BACK SUPER BOWLS FOR GOD’S SAKE).

In short, this entire dispute doesn’t seem to be about it being a make-or-break season regarding LaFleur’s future in Green Bay as much as it is about the expected cost point of coaches in Green Bay. While the Packers don’t have a billionaire owner syphoning off funds to line his own pockets, the team’s rainy day fund “only” grew by $43 million last season (2024). For perspective, Green Bay has spent $29 million more on players in 2025 than they did in 2024, and the Cleveland Browns have spent $362 million more in cash, for players alone, than the Los Angeles Rams since the pandemic. Millions sound a lot until things start costing millions.

As much as you’d think that the team would be making hand over fist without a billionaire owner, that’s not really how it works. The Packers could blow their financial situation pretty quickly in a league where teams are borrowing from future cap situations regularly (only normal post-Covid), and the cap is rising about $25 million per year. It’s not like the price of facilities or coaching staffs are going down, either.

The prospect for owners to spend above their means is that they’re seeing increases in franchise valuation down the line that justifies the spending, as that dollar figure becomes worth it…once they eventually sell. For example, the Buffalo Bills sold for $1.4 billion about a decade ago. Now, it would take four times that cost to buy an NFL franchise. American sports franchises are one of the safest and most profitable returns on investments in the world, if you have the money.

But Green Bay won’t, and can’t, ever sell 6.2 percent of the club for a cash injection of more than half-billion dollars (more than 12 times what the Packers added to their rainy day fund last year), as the San Francisco 49ers did in May.

Unfortunately, I think we’re headed down the path where the franchise looks around and says, “Hey, we need to be cheap on coaching to keep up with the NFL everywhere else,” a common theme in the Packers’ past, and seemingly the crux of the entire LaFleur non-extension.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...ity-is-to-extend-matt-lafleur-brian-gutekunst
 
Chicago Bears designate 2 players to return from injured reserve

gettyimages-2250543027.jpg


On Tuesday, the Chicago Bears announced that they have designated offensive tackle Braxton Jones and cornerback Kyler Gordon to return. Both have been members of the injured reserve, but are now allowed to practice with the team this week and could possibly play against the Green Bay Packers in the wild card round.

Jones began the year as the Bears’ starting left tackle, but he eventually lost that job to Theo Benedet, who eventually lost that job to second-round rookie Ozzy Trapilo. Trapilo was inactive in the Week 18 regular-season finale last week, when the starters played against the Detroit Lions with playoff seeding on the line for Chicago.

If Trapilo isn’t 100 percent, there’s a possibility that Jones, who has been on the IR with a knee injury since Week 8, could be a replacement starter.

Meanwhile, Gordon is on his second stint on the injured reserve this year. First, he went on IR from Weeks 8 through Week 12, before being activated to the 53-man roster in Week 13. He was then placed back on the injured reserve in Week 15.

The first trip on the IR for Gordon was due to a calf injury. His second stint was because of a groin injury he suffered during pregame warmups in Week 15.

Gordon has mostly been a nickelback for the Bears, which is important to keep in mind because Chicago’s starting slot, Chancey Gardner-Johnson, went down with a concussion in Week 18. So, like Jones, Gordon could actually become a replacement starter in the first round of the playoffs, depending on how this week goes.

If both Gordon and Gardner-Johnson can’t play, it will be Nick McCloud, a fifth-year player who has started just four games with the Bears and has been on three teams in the last two years, covering the Packers’ Jayden Reed.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...nate-2-players-to-return-from-injured-reserve
 
Tuesday Cheese Curds: Packers turn to playoffs after long last month

gettyimages-2254642218.jpg


What do you make of these playoff-bound Green Bay Packers?

There is no shortage of possible opinions. Maybe they’re a shambolic mess, maybe they’re a sleeping juggernaut, maybe they’re a badly bruised and broken team that should have been much better, maybe they’re some combination of all these things and more.

But they are, above all, a playoff team — for whatever that gets them. In the short term, that gets them a matchup with the Chicago Bears. In the long term? Who knows? There’s no team in the NFC or AFC playoff field that feels impossible for the Packers to beat, though some are certainly more challenging than others. But can they get it done?

That’s been the question for the Packers all year, even when they were at their best and healthiest, and it’s still the question now. They have to face a tough Bears team on Saturday night. Can they get it done? We’re about to find out.

Top 10 plays that got Packers into playoffs | Packers.com

The last month of the season wasn’t much to write home about, but there were plenty of great plays that got the Packers to the playoffs.

NFL playoff myth-busters: Why you’re wrong about all 14 teams | ESPN

There’s plenty to digest about all 14 of the NFL’s playoff teams.

11 things you may have forgotten from last Packers-Bears playoff game | Packers News

It’s been 15 years since the Packers faced the Bears in the playoffs. Maybe it’s time for B.J. Raji to finally make his return?

Packers rookie Collin Oliver produces 4 pressures in NFL debut | Packers Wire

It’s been a long time coming, but Collin Oliver finally got into the lineup.

Aaron Rodgers clinched the dignified end he deserved, if this is indeed goodbye | The Athletic ($)

Aaron Rodgers’ career seems to be winding down, but he went out with a good regular season game.

AI-generated police report states Utah officer was turned into a frog | UPI

AI truly is revolutionizing things.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...ackers-turn-to-playoffs-after-long-last-month
 
Schefter on Matt LaFleur’s future: The Packers absolutely want him back

gettyimages-2250587104.jpg


Earlier this week, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that the issue with the Green Bay Packers’ non-extension situation with head coach Matt LaFleur is not about their thoughts on him as a head coach; It’s about money. Schefter said at the time that he expects both LaFleur and general manager Brian Gutekunst to be back in Green Bay next year.

I have been told by sources that Gutekunst’s job was never really on the line this year (I hadn’t gotten a clear word on LaFleur’s situation), but that the lack of an extension for Gutekunst was because of the perception of what an extension for one of the Packers’ key decision-makers meant without the other decision-maker receiving one too. ESPN’s Rob Demovsky has even reported that he believes that Green Bay’s general manager will gain even more power for the Packers next year, as he expects that the head coach will now have to report to the general manager, who would then report to new president/CEO Ed Policy, rather than the current structure where both the head coach and general manager report to the president independently.

On the money front, the Packers have generally been very, very (insert as many veries here as you want) cheap at the assistant coaching level, relying on internal development, but paying the head coach hasn’t really been an issue but one time when Mike McCarthy’s camp had it leak that he was interested in the Texas Longhorns job toward the end of the 2013 season. If you want to read some examples of the assistant pool being an issue, you can find them here. For now, we’ll keep this to LaFleur.

On Wednesday, Schefter spoke to ESPN Milwaukee about what’s going on in Green Bay right now. Schefter warned, “If they go on an extended playoff run, the price only goes up.”

When asked about whether he still believes that LaFleur will be the coach in 2026, he stated, “I think they absolutely want him back. Now the question is, how do they make that happen? It’s got to work for both sides. He wants to be back. They want him back. Can they figure it out?”

So, let’s talk about numbers. I was told by a source, an agent, that LaFleur’s first deal with the Packers was around $5 million per year, which now would be considered pretty low for just about any college program at the power four level, for what it’s worth. For example, Liberty, a program in the non-power conference Conference USA, is paying its coach that much this year and didn’t even compete in the league’s conference title game.

$5 million is a lot to me, a blogger. It’s not a lot for LaFleur, an NFL head coach.

I can’t nail down an exact number on what LaFleur is being paid now, but I’ve been told his most recent extension is probably less than double his initial salary, meaning that it’s under $10 million per year.

If it’s true that the Packers aren’t willing to go into the eight figures for a head coach that they want to keep, that’s extremely concerning. There’s no spinning that. Historically, since the revival of the team after the dark years in the 1970s and 1980s, they’ve sort of tapped into one market over and over as sort of a market inefficiency: First-time head coaches who were previously offensive coordinators.

The team has only been coached by one head coach who doesn’t fit that mold since 1992, the single year that Ray Rhodes coached Green Bay. Here’s the problem: If Green Bay really believes that they can’t go into the eight figures per year for a head coach, then that first-time head coach edge wears away, too, even if they do move on from LaFleur.

Last year, Liam Coen signed a deal worth $12 million per year to become a first-time head coach. Ben Johnson signed for $13 million per year. Las Vegas Raiders offensive coordinator Chip Kelly signed a $6 million per year contract, worth more than what LaFleur got on his first deal to be head coach. Spending in the NFL, with private equity money coming in, franchise valuations being more important than team profits (the Packers can never tap into that valuation because they can never sell) and teams learning how to manipulate the salary cap better after everyone had to do it beginning with the 2020 Covid season, has dramatically exploded the cost of both players and coaches in recent years. It’s gotten to the point where NFL commissioner Roger Goodell stated this summer that some owners are starting to question the integrity of the current salary cap.

To the Packers’ credit, their spending on players has been about league-average since 2020 (and they are sixth in the NFL in wins per player dollar), though that’s $210 million behind the number one team over that time, essentially a full year of cap dollars. Green Bay generally spends above-average on its scouting department, but isn’t by far and away number one there year after year, either. The coaching staff, particularly on the assistant level, is where the team falls behind the league average, based on conversations with agents who represent coaches. The big problem is that in a draft and develop program…the players have to develop…and the assistant coaches are the ones who have the most impact on that development.

My fear, as an unapologetic Green Bay fan, is that the cash for coaches problem is now trickling up from the assistant level to the head coach level. If that’s the case, don’t expect the team to go after John Harbaugh, who was making $17 million per year with the Baltimore Ravens (and might get a raise on the open market) if they enter the head coaching market this offseason.

When Schefter was asked if the team with a sitting head coach that reportedly reached out to Harbaugh’s agent on Tuesday was the Packers, he stated, “I’d be surprised.” He then said that LaFleur would have a similar market to Harbaugh, as the top candidate on the market, if he were to be able to get out of his contract.

As far as the market value for LaFleur goes, here’s what Schefter had to say on the topic:

“You come up with a number that makes him feel good, north of Ben [Johnson]. I think a lot of times it’s in the approach. If they come in under there, ‘Screw them,’ and then maybe eventually they get there.”

The way Schefter made an emphasis on the approach is important here. I’ve been told several times, and it’s been reported elsewhere as such, that the Packers severely low-balled special teams coordinator Darren Rizzi, now the assistant head coach and special teams coordinator of the AFC’s top-ranked Denver Broncos, when trying to build LaFleur’s first staff in Green Bay, to the point with those involved questioned why they even had Rizzi up for a visit if they were going to present a number that was so out of whack with the top-end of the market. That example is one of the most frequent things I’m pointed toward when I ask sources to explain what they mean by an underfunded coaching staff history in Green Bay.

Instead of hiring Rizzi, the Packers ended up going cheap by hiring Sean Mennenga, who hasn’t had a job since he was fired in Green Bay in 2020 and was only 50 years old at the time. He didn’t exactly retire due to old age.

Mennenga had only been a special teams coordinator for one year of his life, for a 6-7 Vanderbilt Commodores team (college football plays with vastly different special teams rules.) When Mennenga was fired, they promoted an internal Mennenga assistant, Maurice Drayton, for cheap to replace him. It wasn’t until their fourth special teams coordinator in five years that the team finally accepted that they actually had to spend at a Rizzi-level.

“You want the guy? Don’t be cute. Go get it done,” said Schefter. “If you don’t, move off him. So what the number is secondary to me to how the approach is done. It’s not hard to figure out what is a right number, but if you want to make somebody fight and grovel and bicker over it, that’s the way to lose and disinfranchise somebody.”

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...s-future-the-packers-absolutely-want-him-back
 
Packers’ Jon-Eric Sullivan advances to finalist for Dolphins GM opening

gettyimages-2254224565.jpg


The Miami Dolphins’ general manager search seems to be moving quickly. On Wednesday night, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that the Dolphins have advanced to the second round of interviews, all in-person, for the position and are down to four candidates for the job. For what it’s worth, Miami “mutually parted ways” with their previous general manager, Chris Grier, on Halloween, so they’ve had significantly more runway than the Atlanta Falcons, the only other team with a general manager opening, who fired theirs on Sunday.

The finalists for the job, per Schefter, include Jon-Eric Sullivan, the Packers’ vice president of player personnel, who has been with the team since he was a training camp intern in 2003. From there, Sullivan was promoted to football operations department employee, central plains region south, southeast region scout, director of college scouting, co-director of player peronnel and finally his 2022 promotion to his current role.

Packers fans are probably most familiar with Sullivan from draft weekend interviews, as he and Milt Hendrickson, director of football operations, are the most-interviewed members of the front office beyond general manager Brian Gutekunst. (Cap guru Russ Ball is an important member of the front office, but he hasn’t really ushered in front of cameras before.)

Sullivan was previously a finalist for the Jacksonville Jaguars’ general manager job in 2025, a search which started very late after the team dragged their feet on the firing of Trent Baalke (he scared head coaching candidates away!) Sullivan had a second interview with the Tennessee Titans last year, a search run by a former Packers front office member (2009-2022) and current Titans’ president of football operations Chad Brinker. Sullivan also interviewed with the Las Vegas Raiders, too.

Current Miami head coach Mike McDaniel is a close friend of Packers head coach Matt LaFleur, and the list of initial candidates for the Dolphins included many front office members who had previously worked with McDaniel’s close friends (including Los Angeles Rams head coach Sean McVay and San Francisco 49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan.) Early reporting claims, though, that GM candidates haven’t been told that McDaniel will absolutely be their head coach in 2026, and Josina Anderson has reported that the Dolphins have “been in touch” with former Baltimore Ravens head coach John Harbaugh, currently the hottest coaching candidate on the market.

Previously, Schefter had claimed that seven teams had called Harbaugh’s representatives about becoming their 2026 head coach, despite only six jobs being available right now (aside from the Ravens, who just moved on from Harbaugh). When asked on ESPN Wisconsin today if the Packers were the team that called about Harbaugh, he said, “I’d be surprised.”

The other candidates for the job, per Schefter, are Dolphins interim general manager Champ Kelly, 49ers director of scouting and football operations Josh Williams (obvious Shanahan connection there) and Los Angeles Chargers assistant general manager Chad Alexander.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-advances-to-finalist-for-dolphins-gm-opening
 
Packers Playoffs: How Green Bay’s depth chart stacks going into the postseason

gettyimages-2252784869.jpg


As someone who has hand-charted the Green Bay Packers’ rotations on offense and defense this year, I want to go position-by-position through the Packers’ roster, detail how the depth chart stands (at least as of Week 18) and try to tell the story of the team that will be facing off against the Chicago Bears on Saturday night. I’m going to try to stack this depth chart as true as I can, but there are times when the true answer is that two (or more) players really share a role. We’ll get into that and all the nitty-gritty, including how injuries have impacted the depth chart, in this piece.

Quarterback​

  • 1: Jordan Love
  • 2: Malik Willis (shoulder/hamstring-questionable)
  • 3: Desmond Ridder

Obviously, Jordan Love is going to be the starting quarterback when healthy. Despite going down with a concussion the last time the Packers and Bears faced off, Love passed concussion protocol last week and served as Clayton Tune’s backup in the team’s less-than-competitive game against the Minnesota Vikings.

Head coach Matt LaFleur said earlier this week that Willis will be able to return to the field, if needed. Behind him is Desmond Ridder, signed to the practice squad last week, who was swapped in for Clayton Tune on Tuesday.

The NFL has a third quarterback rule that states that if both of the team’s top two quarterbacks (in this case Love and Willis) get injured, then a healthy scratch quarterback on the 53-man roster (in this case Ridder) would be able to enter the game, so long as the team accepts that neither of the top two quarterbacks can return to action. That disaster scenario is why Ridder is on the active roster right now. This is common for NFL teams in the postseason.

Running Back​

  • 1: Josh Jacobs
  • 2: Emanuel Wilson
  • 3: Chris Brooks (passing lean)

Josh Jacobs has been dealing with a knee contusion ever since he had an unpleasant meeting with MetLife Stadium’s turf on November 18th. Last week, the Packers made Jacobs one of their four healthy scratches for the game in their meaningless matchup against the Vikings, when Green Bay actively tried to put the lowest players on their depth chart on the field for as many snaps as they could physically handle.

Jacobs will be the bell-cow running back for the playoffs, barring some sort of health setback. What gets really interesting is what the team does in the backup running back role.

While Emanuel Wilson has held down that role for a good chunk of the year, blocking back Chris Brooks has played as many or more snaps than Wilson in four of the Packers’ last six games. Initially, Green Bay tried to use Wilson in a route-running role (14 receptions for 95 yards on the year) and Brooks in two-back looks, with him as a run blocker, or as a lone pass-protector. That seems to have changed recently, though, as Brooks is getting on the field more on passing downs as a route-runner. Against the Vikings, despite playing fewer snaps than Wilson (which is actually a good sign for Brooks, with how reversed snap counts were for the Packers in Week 18), Brooks was the team’s leading rusher (61 yards, 4.7 yards per carry) over Wilson (44 yards, 2.4 yards per carry).

The x-factor at the position, but not in the wild card round, is whether 2024 third-round pick MarShawn Lloyd, who has dealt with a series of injuries in his short time in Green Bay, will be able to return to the field. The Packers were seemingly ready to clear the runway for a Lloyd return until he suffered another hamstring injury in December. Lloyd went back on the injured reserve and is not eligible to rejoin the 53-man roster until the divisional round of the playoffs next week.

Practice squad running back Pierre Strong Jr. has been elevated to the gameday roster three times this year (Weeks 7, 12 and 15), but only when the team was dealing with gametime injuries to either Jacobs, Wilson or Brooks, who all appear to be healthy enough to go against the Bears. Despite Strong being called up to the pool of 55 players who can make the team’s 48-man gameday roster, he was a healthy scratch three times and never got on the field for Green Bay in the regular season.

Wide Receiver​

  • 1/2: Christian Watson/Romeo Doubs
  • 1/2: Christian Watson/Romeo Doubs
  • 3/4: Matthew Golden/Dontayvion Wicks (concussion-questionable)
  • 3/4: Matthew Golden/Dontayvion Wicks (concussion-questionable)
  • 5: Jakobie Keeney-James

The Packers’ depth chart at wide receiver is tiered. Consistently, Christian Watson and Romeo Doubs have been the team’s preferred outside receivers when healthy. If they aren’t healthy, the team leans on a combination of Matthew Golden and Dontayvion Wicks, who generally are rotational guys for the Packers.

Wicks (concussion, missed Week 18) is currently dealing with an injury. On top of that, Savion Williams, the team’s third-round rookie, went on the injured reserve last week with a lingering foot issue that has been bothering him all regular season.

Jakobie Keeney-James was called up from the practice squad last week to the 53-man roster. Keeney-James handled both punt and kick returns for Green Bay against the Vikings, for what it’s worth.

Slot Receiver​

  • 1: Jayden Reed
  • 2/3: Matthew Golden/Dontayvion Wicks (concussion-questionable)
  • 2/3: Matthew Golden/Dontayvion Wicks (concussion-questionable)

Jayden Reed! No, we didn’t forget about him. Reed is the Packers’ primary slot receiver, a role he has almost exclusively played in his three years with the team. Reed is smaller than the typical Matt LaFleur-era receiver, and it seems pretty clear at this point that LaFleur likes him in the slot and only in the slot.

Typically, the next man up when Reed isn’t in the mix, like when he had his stint on the injured reserve earlier in the year, is one of Matthew Golden or Dontayvion Wicks. Bo Melton falls in line behind that (and so did Savion Williams). Christian Watson gets more snaps in the slot than Romeo Doubs, but they both usually only get those looks when the team is throwing out funky formations, like with tight ends or running backs split out wide.

Tight End​

  • 1: Luke Musgrave
  • 2: Josh Whyle (passing lean)
  • 3: Darian Kinnard

You can’t really talk about the tight end position in Green Bay this year without bringing up injuries. Tucker Kraft, who still ranks eighth in the NFL at his position in yards after the catch despite just playing eight games in 2025, was the team’s starter until he was lost for the year with an ACL tear. In incredibly poor timing, the Packers also waived Ben Sims, at the time the team’s fourth tight end, just before the Kraft injury, while trying to open up a spot on the 53-man roster and attempting to land Sims back on Green Bay’s practice squad. Instead, the Minnesota Vikings claimed Sims, which was the end of Sims’ run with the Packers this year.

A couple of weeks ago, blocking tight end John FitzPatrick tore his Achilles tendon. That’s how the Packers lost three of their top four tight ends in 2025. Last week, practice squad tight end McCallan Castles was also added to the practice squad’s injury list, essentially the injured reserve for practice players. To say the least, it’s been a bloodbath at the position this year for Green Bay.

In response to all of these injuries, the Packers brought up Josh Whyle, a former fifth-round pick that Gutekunst was able to secure at the cutdown deadline, from the practice squad to the active roster. Whyle was a pre-draft visitor to Green Bay in 2023, so the team has clearly had its eyes on him for a while. The team has also used swing tackle Darian Kinnard as a tight end in various looks since Kraft’s injury.

Over the last two weeks, the Packers called up Drake Dabney from the practice squad to the gameday roster. Dabney played most of Week 18 (44 of 50 snaps), but he remains a practice squad player and not on the 53-man roster. Short on players at the position, though, don’t be shocked if Dabney either gets called up to the gameday roster again this postseason or even makes the 53-man roster outright.

In Week 17, the Packers’ last “competitive” game, Whyle played 28 snaps to Musgrave’s 18 in a pass-heavy script. Funny enough, considering the receiving game was supposed to be the big calling card on Musgrave’s scouting report coming out of college, Green Bay has leaned on Whyle more than Musgrave in recent weeks when they actually need to throw the ball.

With that being said, the Packers basically put Musgrave in bubble wrap, playing him just two snaps against the Vikings, while Whyle took on 36 offensive snaps and also played 13 more on special teams. Truthfully, I think that Green Bay views Musgrave as their current starting tight end, but if the Packers start to chase points, then assume that Whyle’s snaps will shoot up like a rocket, as they did against the Baltimore Ravens two weeks ago.

Offensive Line​

  • LT: Rasheed Walker
  • LG: Aaron Banks
  • C: Sean Rhyan
  • RG: Anthony Belton
  • RT: Zach Tom (knee/back-questionable)
  • 6: Jordan Morgan (T/G)
  • 7: Darian Kinnard (T/G)
  • 8: Jacob Monk (C/G)
  • 9: Lecitus Smith (C/G)

The starter missing in this group is center Elgton Jenkins, who was lost against the Philadelphia Eagles on November 10th, but the team also has Travis Glover and Donovan Jennings on injured reserve, who were supposed to be depth pieces this year. In fact, Glover’s season-ending lat injury in the summer is probably why the Packers were proactive and traded for former Eagle Darian Kinnard at the cutdown deadline. Jennings had only played six offensive snaps and seven special teams snaps in 2025 before he suffered a throat injury last week in practice and was shut down until at least Super Bowl week.

After Jenkins’ injury, Sean Rhyan, who previously split time at right guard with Jordan Morgan, moved to center. When Morgan, who has played much better at tackle in recent weeks, couldn’t hack it as an every-down guard, Anthony Belton, a rookie second-round pick, took over at the position.

As it stands right now, the Packers’ preferred offensive line (with Jenkins out) is Rasheed Walker, Aaron Banks, Rhyan, Belton and Zach Tom (left to right). Morgan has been receiving playing time recently as Tom’s injury replacement, as Tom has been dealing with both a knee injury and a lingering back issue. Generally, I would say that Morgan is the “next man up” at every position other than center, as the Packers have been trying to keep Kinnard free to play some tight end looks.

LaFleur stated earlier this week that Tom will be playing on Saturday, but as the week progressed, that “will” turned into more of a “maybe.” Tom sat out of Thursday’s practice for a rest day, after the initial plan the day before was for him to participate in the final practice of the week.

The other backup linemen on the team are Jacob Monk, who is probably the next man up at center, and Lecitus Smith, who was signed from the practice squad last week after Jennings’ injury.

Two other players might make a gameday appearance (likely on the field goal protection unit) this postseason: John Williams and Brant Banks. Williams has been on the physically unable to perform list all season after suffering a back injury before training camp. He has been practicing with the team and is designated to return, though. Don’t be shocked if he displaces Smith.

Banks was also available on gameday for the Packers in Weeks 2 and 4. In Week 4, Banks was responsible for the blown assignment on field goal protection that led to the Dallas Cowboys blocking a kick and ultimately forcing a tie. He was waived the next week (likely due to the roster situation more than his performance) and was claimed by the Tennessee Titans, where he spent all of one week before reverting to Green Bay’s practice squad. What a journey for the undrafted rookie.

Defensive End​

  • 1: Rashan Gary
  • 2/3: Lukas Van Ness/Kingsley Enagbare
  • 2/3: Lukas Van Ness/Kingsley Enagbare
  • 4: Brenton Cox Jr.
  • 5: Barryn Sorrell
  • 6: Collin Oliver
  • 7: Arron Mosby

Hey, you’ve made it over 2,000 words at this point. This is the part where we finally mention how bad it sucks that Micah Parsons tore his ACL. Aside from Myles Garrett, no pass-rusher in the NFL was more impactful this year than Parsons. Then he was just gone.

The hope was that Parsons and Rashan Gary (along with some help from Lukas Van Ness) would be the best pass-rushing duo in the league this season. Now, Parsons is out of the picture (for the 2025 season), and Gary has been one of the most disappointing players league-wide this year.

Van Ness had arguably the best game of his career against the Ravens two weeks ago (he and Gary didn’t play a snap against the Vikings), after dealing with a foot injury from October 12th on, which included him missing action for two full months. Hopefully, Van Ness can turn it back for the playoffs.

The Packers got back Brenton Cox Jr. and Collin Oliver from their injury lists recently, which has really clogged the whole depth chart at the position. Two weeks ago, both Barryn Sorrell and Oliver, the team’s rookie fourth- and fifth-round picks, were healthy scratches against Baltimore. In Week 18, though, Sorrell had a bit of a breakout game, which might make the team rethink keeping him as a healthy scratch against the Bears.

To make Sorrell active, though, Green Bay will probably have to healthy scratch Brenton Cox Jr., as Aaron Mosby is one of the team’s true special teams contributors.

[The real special teams aces (non-returners or specialists) on the 2025 team are Mosby, linebacker Nick Neimann (currently on the injured reserve), cornerback/receiver Bo Melton and safety Zayne Anderson (currently on the injured reserve). The other non-starters, for the most part, are just playing special teams because someone has to in the Packers’ always young draft and develop program.]

Nose Tackle​

  • 1: Colby Wooden
  • 2: Warren Brinson (foot – questionable)
  • 3/4: Nazir Stackhouse/Jonathan Ford
  • 3/4: Nazir Stackhouse/Jonathan Ford

The Packers planned for Kenny Clark to be their starting nose tackle in 2025, but then the Dallas Cowboys made the demand that he be part of the Micah Parsons trade. I don’t blame Colby Wooden here because at the combine in 2023, he was just 274 pounds (he’s clearly heavier now), but he’s not an NFL-caliber starter at the position. It had to take a Parsons-level trade to put Green Bay in a spot this poor at nose tackle this year, sort of a perfect storm.

As we wrote about this offseason, the free agent market at nose tackle was bare. In the draft, nose tackles went much higher than they were projected to, as a response to the weak free agent market. There weren’t big names made available for the Packers in-season, as every team held onto their big-body defensive tackles tightly.

That’s how you get Wooden, officially still listed at 274 pounds on Green Bay’s roster, playing 55 percent of the team’s total defensive snaps at nose tackle in 2025.

Behind Wooden, things haven’t been much better, either. Initially, the plan seemed to be that Nazir Stackhouse was going to be the backup at the position, with Wooden subbing out for the Packers’ three-defensive-end “Cheetah” looks. Basically, Green Bay’s three-technique tackle (usually Karl Brooks) would be the lone defensive tackle on the field while an extra defensive end kicked into the interior line (usually Micah Parsons or Lukas Van Ness) in obvious passing situations.

The problem is that obvious passing situations eventually were hard for the Packers to come by, leading to long double-digit-play drives in the second halves of games, which you could visibly see gassing Green Bay’s defensive tackles.

In response to that trend, the Packers began to start looking for new nose tackles, as the shelf life of Stackhouse’s contributions usually hovered around 10 to 15 effective snaps a game (which isn’t terrible for an undrafted rookie!) When rookie sixth-round pick Warren Brinson had to play more three-technique following Devonte Wyatt’s injury (more on that later), Green Bay picked up Jordon Riley from the New York Giants’ practice squad and claimed Quinton Bohanna from waivers.

Riley was put on injured reserve last week, while Bohanna was waived by the team to make room for the new addition of Jonathan Ford, a former Packers draft pick who has spent the last year or so with the Chicago Bears. Ford made his regular-season debut with Green Bay last week against the Vikings, the same week he rejoined the Packers.

This is probably the Packers’ weakest pre-injury position in 2025, and it will probably be the position that the team wants to address the most in the 2026 draft. (I apologize to those of you clamoring for cornerbacks.)

Three-Technique​

  • 1: Karl Brooks
  • 2: Warren Brinson (foot – questionable)
  • 3: Lukas Van Ness (Cheetah)
  • 4/5: Barryn Sorrell/Kingsley Enagbare (Cheetah)
  • 4/5: Barryn Sorrell/Kingsley Enagbare (Cheetah)

Initially, the plan was for Karl Brooks to be the team’s rotational three-technique behind starter Devonte Wyatt, eat some special teams snaps and play “Cheetah” snaps in 2025. With Wyatt going down with a fractured ankle on Thanksgiving against the Lions, though, Brooks has been pushed up to a true starting role at the three-technique position.

To backfill for Brooks, sixth-round rookie Warren Brinson is now the next man up. That’s sort of all the team has at the position, as Colby Wooden, Nazir Stackhouse and Jonathan Ford have been used as true nose tackles this year (Brinson is really the only hybrid tackle in the entire room.)

In passing situations, though, don’t be surprised to see defensive ends Lukas Van Ness, Barryn Sorrell or Kingsley Enagbare to kick inside on “Cheetah” snaps. They’ve all done that at different points this year.

Linebacker​

  • Mike: Quay Walker
  • Will: Edgerrin Cooper
  • Sam: Isaiah McDuffie
  • 4: Ty’Ron Hopper
  • 5: Nick Neimann (pectoral – questionable)

This position is very simple, because all four of the Packers’ contributors this year are healthy. Quay Walker is the team’s middle linebacker, with Edgerrin Cooper being the other linebacker in nickel looks. In 4-3 looks, Isaiah McDuffie comes off the bench as the team’s extra linebacker.

Whenever Walker or Cooper has been hurt, McDuffie takes over their role, and then 2024 third-round pick Ty’Ron Hopper backfills as the team’s third linebacker for McDuffie.

Both Nick Niemann and Kristian Welch have previously been on the 53-man roster, but they are more special teams contributors than true defenders. Welch is on the injured reserve, while Niemann was brought back from the injured reserve to the 53-man roster this week. When the Packers are in a pinch, they have called up practice squad linebacker Jamon Johnson, an undrafted rookie, to the gameday roster. Last week, he got his first defensive snaps of the regular season, as he had spent most of his time this year on special teams. If Niemann can’t go, there’s a good chance Johnson is brought up.

Outside Cornerback​

  • Left: Keisean Nixon
  • Right: Carrington Valentine (pass lean)
  • 3: Trevon Diggs
  • 4/5/6: Shemar Bartholomew/Jaylin Simpson/Bo Melton (knee)
  • 4/5/6: Shemar Bartholomew/Jaylin Simpson/Bo Melton (knee)
  • 4/5/6: Shemar Bartholomew/Jaylin Simpson/Bo Melton (knee)

Alrighty, if saying that nose tackle is a bigger need than outside cornerback for next year’s Packers didn’t make Green Bay fans mad enough at me, here’s another shot: I think Trevon Diggs is going to back up Keisean Nixon and Carrington Valentine in the playoffs.

While LaFleur gave some lip service to the idea of Diggs starting in the postseason, it had a lot more of “we’re not ruling anything out for anyone” vibes than a true commitment to Diggs. I’ve seen fans post the question of “Why did we waiver claim Diggs if we weren’t going to start him?” The answer is simple: The Packers’ depth at the position got nuked in Week 17.

Against the Ravens, Nate Hobbs and Kamal Hadden, the team’s third and fourth outside cornerbacks, were both injured and later placed on the injured reserve. In Week 18, had the Packers not claimed Diggs (and his half-million-ish remaining cap hit in 2025), the team would have been one injury away from having to play two practice-squad call-ups (Shemar Bartholomew and Jaylin Simpson) or Bo Melton (who at this point might be a cornerback in name only) in the postseason.

Green Bay went out of its way to protect Carrington Valentine (who didn’t play a snap of defense) and Keisean Nixon (who played just five) in Week 18 against the Vikings. I don’t doubt that there might be certain situations (like we saw in the Ravens game) where the team will want to try to get Valentine off the field in obvious run situations (it’s not the strength of his game). In those looks, I can see Diggs coming in and playing in place of Valentine, as the Packers tried to do it against Baltimore with both Hobbs and Hadden before their injuries.

Still, though, I expect Nixon and Valentine to out-snap Diggs in the postseason. I hope that Diggs intercepts every pass that an opposing quarterback throws, returns them all for touchdowns and the Packers win the Super Bowl, but until I see him actually displace a starter, I won’t believe it’s happening this year.

Good luck making sense of the cornerbacks behind the top three on the depth chart, by the way. Bartholomew and Simpson didn’t play a snap for the Packers’ defense this year until the JV game versus Minnesota. Melton hasn’t played a single snap of defense all year, despite contributing on offense while he’s been listed as a cornerback on the official roster.

Slot Defender​

  • 1: Javon Bullard (knee – questionable)
  • 2: Kitan Oladapo

With Trevon Diggs backfilling at outside cornerback, the position where the Nate Hobbs injury really hurts the Packers is in the slot. Before Hobbs’ injury, he and safety Javon Bullard sort of split time in the nickel position throughout 2025, with Hobbs playing more obvious passing situations (and doing it pretty well).

Bullard was injured against the Vikings, but both he and LaFleur claim that he’s going to be okay. The only other player who has lined up in the nickel spot this year has been safety Kitan Oladapo, who played limited snaps at the position before Week 18 (we’re talking like less than ten) in prevent situations at the end of halves.

If Bullard can’t go on Saturday, Oladapo will be the next man up. After that, it would be anyone’s guess.

Safety​

  • 1: Xavier McKinney
  • 2: Evan Williams
  • 3: Javon Bullard (knee – questionable, run lean)
  • 4: Kitan Oladapo
  • 5: Johnathan Baldwin

Xavier McKinney has been the team’s starter all year, and, for the most part, so has Evan Williams. There are certain situations where Javon Bullard comes in and plays safety in 4-3 looks against run-heavy situations (like recently against the Ravens), but Bullard is situational while Williams is the starter.

Usually, the player next up behind that trio is Zayne Anderson (who is a true defender, too, not just a special teams player), who is now on the injured reserve. Kitan Oladapo, the 2024 fifth-round pick, has looked solid in limited playing time over the last two years and will have to backfill for Anderson if there’s another injury at the position (remember, Bullard also starts in the slot).

The Packers signed Johnathan Baldwin to the 53-man roster from the practice squad last week. Before Week 18, Baldwin hadn’t been active on gameday for Green Bay this year. Baldwin was a nickelback at the college level with UNLV and moved to safety this offseason. The undrafted rookie was one of the Packers’ biggest financial commitments in the post-draft free agent class, along with nose tackle Nazir Stackhouse and linebacker Jamon Johnson.

Jaylin Simpson is officially listed by the team as a safety, but all indications are that he’s a cornerback for Green Bay. In Week 18, all his snaps were at cornerback. Previously, Simpson has spent time with NFL teams at both positions.



I’ll update this post throughout the week if there are any changes to the 53-man roster. Until then, feel free to yell at me about what you think I got wrong in the comment section.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-depth-chart-stacks-going-into-the-postseason
 
Packers DC Jeff Hafley up to 3 HC interview requests

imagn-27578057.jpg


A month ago, Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley said that he bets that defensive end Micah Parsons, who tore his ACL during the 2025 regular season, will break the NFL’s sack record in 2026. Hafley might not be around to see that plan through, though, as he’s been a hot name on the coaching market.

Teams are not allowed to interview coaching candidates who are on teams that play on wild card weekend until next week, but that doesn’t mean that they can’t announce that those interviews will be scheduled. So while Hafley hasn’t spent any time with other teams as he preps to stop the Chicago Bears this week, other clubs are already getting in line to talk to him.

The first request came from the Tennessee Titans. Now, the Atlanta Falcons and Arizona Cardinals have also submitted requests to speak with Hafley next week.

Assume that this number continues to grow, as the Cleveland Browns, Las Vegas Raiders, Miami Dolphins and his hometown New York Giants also have job openings at the top level. Because of league rules, Hafley won’t be able to interview until Tuesday, January 13th. For what it’s worth, Tuesdays are usually the closest things that coaches have to off days during a regular week in the NFL.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-dc-jeff-hafley-up-to-3-hc-interview-requests
 
Green Bay Packers cap casualty projections drop for 2026 offseason

gettyimages-2246631915.jpg


Over the Cap has just dropped their cap casualty rankings for the upcoming offseason, which includes four Green Bay Packers in their top 100 players. Only three teams have more plays on the list than the Packers: the Arizona Cardinals (nine), the Minnesota Vikings (seven) and the Washington Commanders (seven).

Personally, I only think that Green Bay will make two cuts. Let’s go ahead and talk about each player’s situation.

#7: Elgton Jenkins, OL (78.6 percent for “negative fate”)​


This is the easiest one to predict, as it was obvious based on his 2026 cap hit (and struggles in 2024) that Jenkins was headed for being a cap casualty even going into the 2025 regular season. It’s the reason why he attempted to gain an extension this offseason by holding out, but general manager Brian Gutekunst and cap guru Russ Ball didn’t budge.

Eventually, Jenkins returned to the practice field for the Packers as a center, where he didn’t fare any better than last year, when his slip in play began, at left guard. In Week 11, Jenkins fractured his fibula, more than likely ending his career with the green and gold.

If Green Bay releases Jenkins this offseason, they’ll immediately gain $20 million in cap space. This one is happening. Take it to the bank.

#t-33: Keisean Nixon, CB (65.9 percent)​


I wouldn’t hold my breath on this one. I don’t think the team actually has any ambition to move off of Keisean Nixon’s contract.

Here are a couple of things to keep in mind:

  • Nixon is only making $5 million in cash next year, about one-fourth of the price of an average veteran starting cornerback on their second contract in the NFL. He’s a very cheap option for the team. Cheap matters to the Packers’ current cap situation A LOT.
  • When Trevon Diggs got on the field for the Packers last week, all of his snaps were at right cornerback, the position that Carrington Valentine starts at, not at left cornerback, where Nixon starts.
  • Against the Vikings, when the Packers actively tried to keep their most valuable players off the field, the team kept Nixon on the sideline (after the first drive, which he requested to start, according to head coach Matt LaFleur) while safeties Javon Bullard and Evan Williams continued to see action (they could have structured the defense in a way where the opposite was true, based on the personnel they had available to them). The coaching staff would have rather risked a Bullard injury, which happened, going into a win-or-go-home game, rather than Nixon. That’s an important piece of context.

Ultimately, with the Packers’ cap and pick situation (it’s not good) going into 2026, I think the team will have Nixon, Valentine and Nate Hobbs compete at outside cornerback, again, with the possibility of Diggs returning, if the team and his camp can find a number that works for both sides.

I expect that defensive tackle is going to be the team’s number one priority in the offseason. I don’t think that the team will go into free agency for a starting player on either side of the ball, at least as long as they bring back center Sean Rhyan. If the team spends their first pick on the draft on a defensive tackle, the next highest pick that can be used on a cornerback will be 84th overall, as it stands today — it could be even later if they win playoff games. The Packers draft for the future, not the present. Over two decades, the average first-round pick has started just a third of the season for them, let alone a third-round pick.

I don’t think the team is going to take $5 million in cap relief to open up a hole at cornerback (or at least make it less competitive room in 2026), because they are going to have very few ways of filling that hole.

#t-43: Josh Jacobs, RB (64 percent)​


This is another one I don’t buy. I get it. Josh Jacobs is already the geriatric age of (checks notes) 27 years old. The horror.

The running game was limited this year, but much of that had to do with blocking more than running back ability (when healthy). The other two running backs on the 53-man roster are Chris Brooks and Emanuel Wilson, who are restricted free agents. The cost to tender them is gonna be around $3.5 million, a number that the Packers will decline for both, allowing Brooks and Wilson to hit the market as true free agents.

If the MarShawn Lloyd situation had played out differently, maybe a Jacobs release could be on the table, but I don’t see the team taking $8 million in cap savings to move on from Jacobs. Going into the draft with just one back who has ever played for you, being Lloyd, who has only ever played in one regular-season game, seems like a mistake. I’d be surprised if this one happens.

#t-98: Rashan Gary, DE (50 percent)​


I would expect this one to happen, or at least a restructuring to happen. We’ve talked about this topic at length before. After a great year-and-a-half of play in his prime, Gary has now been on a slide. In 2025, he’s hit what I have to imagine has to be rock bottom, where he’s one of the most inefficient players from a pass-rushing perspective, despite playing a bunch of snaps for the team.

The Packers can save $11 million by cutting Gary this offseason. I’m working under the assumption that they do it. Between the cuts of Jenkins and Gary, if you bring back center Sean Rhyan on a modest deal and make some smaller moves to retain players on the bottom end of the roster, that basically gets Green Bay’s cap situation to where it needs to be going into the draft.



If the Packers dip their toes in free agency this offseason:

  • First of all, they would have to borrow cap space from the future, which will make the teardown (beginning in 2027) more aggressive. The window for this roster, as constructed, is really the 2025 and 2026 seasons. They will likely have to rebuild in 2027 and 2028 before getting put in a similar position again in 2029.
  • Secondly, they will probably add players who were released from other teams (cap casualties), not players whose contracts expired.

Why, you might ask? Because players whose contracts expire count against the NFL’s compensatory pick formula, which is going to be very important for the team (maybe the most impactful part of the Packers’ 2026 offseason).

As it stands right now, projections have Green Bay netting a 2027 fourth-round pick for the loss of left tackle Rasheed Walker, should he hit the market, and 2027 fifth-round picks for losses of quarterback Malik Willis, receiver Romeo Doubs and linebacker Quay Walker. The most compensatory picks a team can earn in one class is four selections, and the players listed above are highly likely to be the players who will earn the Packers their highest picks in 2027 (the first year of the post-Micah Parsons trade teardown).

Other compensatory pick options include center Sean Rhyan and defensive end Kingsley Enagbare, who I’d guess would earn the Packers sixth-round picks, should Green Bay re-sign one or two of the Walkers, Willis or Doubs (I really think that Quay Walker is the only player who has a chance to come back from that list, but I even have my doubts at that at this point.)

The Packers will not offset their high compensatory pick selections. That is not how this team operates. So if they sign a decent-sized free agent deal, it is probably a player on OTC’s cap casualty rankings. Feel free to mine the data and find your favorite option.

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-casualty-projections-drop-for-2026-offseason
 
Best Wildcard Round performaces in Packers history includes huge plays by Packers legends

gettyimages-80746063.jpg


The Packers last got the chance to opt out of the Wildcard Round in 2021; since then, all three of their playoff appearances have involved getting some work in during the opening round of the NFL’s playoff bracket.

Who owns the best performances during those games? I’m glad you asked. Here are the best of the best from the Wildcard Round in Packers history.

(Note: All of the years referenced are referring to the year of the season in which these games took place, not the year in which the games took place. For example, Aaron Rodgers’ big passing performance against the Cardinals technically happened in 2010, but it was a part of the 2009 season)

Most passing yards – 423 (Aaron Rodgers, 2009)

There’s really only one juggernaut passing performance from the Wildcard Round in Packers history: Aaron Rodgers’ 423-yard outing against the Cardinals at the end of the 2009 season. In a 51-45 overtime shootout, Rodgers led the Packers back from 31-10 deficit only to narrowly miss Greg Jennings on what likely would have been an 80-yard game-winning pass on the first play of overtime. A few plays later, Rodgers was strip-sacked (and facemasked) and the Cardinals returned the fumble for a game-winning score of their own, sending Rodgers home empty-handed after what was otherwise a great game.

Rushing yards – 123 (James Starks, 2010)

A little-used sixth round pick in 2010, James Starks burst onto the scene in the Packers’ 2010 Wildcard Round win over the Philadelphia Eagles. On 23 carries, Starks piled up 123 yards but didn’t find the end zone, allowing Tom Crabtree to score his only career postseason touchdown instead. Starks never crossed the 100-yard mark in the rest of his playoff career.

Receiving yards – 159 (Jermichael Finley, 2009)

Jermichael Finely and Greg Jennigs both broke the 130-yard mark during the aforementioned shootout with the Cardinals in 2009, but Finley got top honors with his 159-yard effort. It was, to that point, just the second 100-yard receiving game of Finley’s career.

Romeo Doubs should get an honorable mention here, too. In the Packers’ 48-32 romp over the Cowboys at the end of the 2023 season, he piled up 151 yards on six catches and scored a touchdown, becoming just the second player in Packers history to cross the 150-yard threshold in the Wildcard Round. Personally, I’d love to see him do that again this weekend.

Points – 18 (three players)

Points are a more obscure metric in modern football, but you’ll like the payoff here. Three players have scored 18 points in a Wildcard Round game: Aaron Jones with three touchdowns against the Cowboys in the Romeo Doubs game mentioned above, Randall Cobb with three touchdowns against the Giants in the 2016 playoffs (including a half-ending Hail Mary), and Sterling Sharpe with three touchdowns against the Lions in the 1993 playoffs.

Sharpe takes the top spot here, in my opinion, not because of anything spectacular he did, but because of the throw that led to the last of his three touchdowns. Just sit back and watch Brett Favre rip this ball across the field. That’s the positive version of the Brett Favre experience in a nutshell: the audacity to try something insane, and the talent to pull it off.

(Spoiler alert: this is not the last time we’ll talk about this game, and it might not even be the most spectacular play from it.)

Sacks – 2.5 (Nick Perry, 2015)

It’s a toss-up as to whether or not Nick Perry or the next player on this list is the most unexpected name, but Perry is the only player in Packers history to record more than two sacks in a game on Wildcard weekend. Working primarily against future Hall of Famer Trent Williams (then with Washington), Perry earned his 2.5 sacks, bagged a huge contract extension in the offseason, and played a grand total of 36 more professional football games before he ended up out of the league.

Tackles – 10 (Matt Bowen, 2002)

The less said about the Packers’ 2002 playoff loss to Michael Vick and the Atlanta Falcons at Lambeau Field, the better, but Matt Bowen collected 10 solo tackles that day. Moving on!

Interceptions – 1 (multiple players)

Okay, I mentioned that we’d be returning to the Packers’ 1993 playoff win over the Detroit Lions. Here we are.

Many, many players have recorded an interception in the Wildcard Round for the Packers (though nobody’s had more than one, another thing the Packers should try to fix this weekend). However, nobody has nabbed one as impactful as George Teague did in that Lions’ playoff game.

Leading 17-14, the Lions found themselves deep in Packers territory in the waning minutes of the third quarter with a chance to all but put the game away. A touchdown would dig the Packers quite a hole, but on 2nd and goal from the Packers’ five-yard line, the whole game flipped.

On that play, George Teague stepped up on an out-breaking route in the end zone, grabbed Erik Kramer’s pass, then cruised 101 yards for a score that gave the Packers the lead and made Brett Favre’s megathrow to Sterling Sharpe possible. And it was 101 yards of remarkably clear sailing for Teague. After stepping over Kramer’s tackle attempt at the 15-yard line, Teague never faced another serious threat during his long jaunt. Here’s the video. Enjoy!

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...istory-includes-huge-plays-by-packers-legends
 
Packers Discussion: How do you expect the Bears wild card game to go?

gettyimages-2250018318.jpg


Folks, I’ve got a mask for mask bet going with a Chicago Bears fan going on already. I know where I stand on this game, but I want to hear from you.

Personally, I don’t worry about the Green Bay Packers scoring points in this game. I think the wild card round game will be decided by the Packers’ ability to stop the run, but considering how these two teams matched up in the previous two games, I’m optimistic we outscore them.

The Bears didn’t hold a lead for a second of regulation in either game. It’s amazing that either game was decided by one score, let alone both.

How do you see this game playing out?

If you need some inspiration, check out our depth chart update, complete with all recent moves and injuries, both teams’ final injury reports of the week, our Q and A with a Bears writer or some fun Caleb Williams slander.

Join the conversation!​


Sign up for a user account and get:

  • Fewer ads
  • Create community posts
  • Comment on articles, community posts
  • Rec comments, community posts
  • New, improved notifications system!

Source: https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-do-you-expect-the-bears-wild-card-game-to-go
 
Back
Top