News Flyers Team Notes

Christian Dvorak explains how Rick Tocchet influenced decision to sign with Flyers

The Philadelphia Flyers needed help down the middle heading into this offseason, and they’ve addressed that a bit by trading for Trevor Zegras and signing Christian Dvorak. While Zegras is more of a high-upside guy, Dvorak provides some stability in the bottom half of the lineup as a strong two-way presence.

Dvorak met with the media on Thursday and explained, among other things, why he chose Philadelphia and what role his former and new head coach, Rick Tocchet, played in his decision.

“That certainly helps, being familiar with Tocc and the way he coaches. He helped me out a lot in Arizona as a young guy, and we had a real young team there, too,” Dvorak recalled. “He was really good with us, and I know he’s going to be great with the young guys here in Philly. It helps a lot to know the way he coaches. Talking to him, I think it’s going to be a great opportunity for me, and I’m really excited for it.”

Dvorak was one of the young guys on those Coyotes teams, but now he’ll be one of the older guys on a young Flyers team. According to Elite Prospects, the Flyers had the third-youngest team last season with an average age of 26.54 years.

The 29-year-old center has established himself as a reliable third-line center throughout his career. He had two of his best years under Tocchet in Arizona, posting 37 points (15 goals, 22 assists) in 78 games during the 2017-18 season and 38 points (18 goals, 20 assists) two years later.

Dvorak explained why Tocchet helped him reach his peak during those seasons.

“He’s big on communication, which is huge. He always has an open-door policy, which is nice. He loves talking to everyone on the team and knowing what they’re thinking. I think that’s big,” he said. “Always a well-structured coach, everyone knows where they need to be out there, and offensively, he gives you some freedom, too.”

The veteran detailed what he thinks his role will be in Philadelphia based on his conversations with his head coach.

“He said there’s a big opportunity that they’re a little bit thin down the middle, so it felt like a great fit for me, a guy who can play a 200-foot game, play in all situations, win faceoffs, I think that was a big thing too,” he said. “I think it’s a great opportunity for me, and that’s kind of the role I’m expecting.”

It was a thin free-agency market, especially at center, which left Dvorak as one of the top options available heading into July 1.

“There were options out there. It’s a pretty stressful day. First time being a free agent so you never really know what it’s going to be like,” he said. “I thought (the Flyers) showed a lot of interest in me. They showed they wanted me a lot, which was huge. It’s always nice to feel that. I think it was just a good fit for me.”

The Flyers did, in fact, show a lot of interest in Dvorak — $5.4 million, to be exact. It was likely more than any other team offered him on an annual basis, but the Flyers did that — as Danny Briere stressed — to keep it to a one-year deal.

In a way, he’s betting on himself, but he sees a big opportunity with the Flyers as well.

“I guess so, a little bit,” Dvorak said. “There were other options out there, but I felt like it was just a great fit for me in Philly.”

Dvorak played a full 82 games last season for the first time in his career, and he didn’t show any signs of fatigue. He had 15 points (6 goals, 9 assists) in 23 games in March and April, and two goals in five postseason games.

“I want to build off last year with the momentum I had, getting better throughout last season and in the playoffs,” he continued. “I felt I took my game to another level late in the year, and want to start this upcoming year at that level. I’m confident in my abilities and just excited for the opportunity.”

It’s safe to pencil Dvorak in on the third line for the upcoming season with fellow centers Sean Couturier, Trevor Zegras, and Noah Cates in the mix as well. There is the possibility that Cates or Dvorak himself moves to left wing to play together on a shutdown line — Dvorak won 55.8% of his faceoffs last season while Cates won just 44.6% of his.

Dvorak should also be a key contributor on the penalty kill, replacing Ryan Poehling, and could see time on the second power-play unit to win faceoffs and help facilitate things.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...ee-agency-latest-dvorak-says-tocchet-signing/
 
2024-25 Player Review: Sam Ersson seriously struggled

Expectations for were always going to be high for Sam Ersson this season: he’d shown promise as a viable tandem goaltender during the 2023-24 season as the 1B to Carter Hart’s 1A. However, with Hart’s departure, Ersson faltered when thrust into the starter’s role for the remainder of that season. There’d been enough positives to have hope that he would, after a summer off to rest and prepare, bounce back and succeed in 2024-25. As we all know, the opposite happened.

Games PlayedStartsWinsLossesOT LossesGAASave PercentageShutoutsGoals Saved Above Expected
4745221753.14.8832-22.09

Not only was Ersson’s -22.09 goals saved above expected the worst on the Flyers, it was the worst in the NHL by nearly double the next worst goaltender: Phillip Grubauer, who had a -12.66 GSAx per Evolving Hockey. Even Ivan Fedotov, bad as he was, posted a -12.03 GSAx; third worst in the league but, unbelievably, second worst on the Flyers. For even more context: Ersson’s goals saved above expected was the sixth worst by any goaltender in the last five years–just atrocious. Opposing teams were able to score from just about anywhere on the ice when he was in net.

image-7.png

Yikes!

The good news is that Ersson’s abysmal performance in net is not in line with the rest of his NHL play: in the 51 games during the 2023-24 season, he had a -1.9 GSAx. That’s not ideal, but it’s certainly respectable enough for a rookie goaltender. Hopefully, the 2024-25 season is nothing more than an egregious outlier, because there’s nothing positive to take from it outside of being named to Sweden’s Four Nations team.

We’d be remiss, of course, to not mention the injury that kept Ersson out of action for about a month in November and December. Groin injuries have been an issue with Ersson before, and that is what reportedly kept him out last fall as well. At 25 years old, Ersson is still young by goaltender standards, and a path still exists for him to establish himself as top dog in a tandem arrangement. However, if recurring injuries are going to limit his ability to start consistently, it’d be dangerous for the Flyers to rely on him as their best goaltender, and would likely mean relegation to a more 1B-esque role. The 2024-25 season was an opportunity for Ersson to show the Flyers that they can depend on him–especially when considering how awful Fedotov and Aleksei Kolosov were as backups–and Ersson didn’t step up in the way the team needed him to.

Three Questions​


Did he live up to expectations?

Not at all. This was a disappointing season from Ersson no matter how you slice it, even when accounting for injury. Save percentages were deflated league wide last season, with .900 being the lowest since the 1995-96 season when it was .898, but Ersson’s .883 is not going to cut it. He needs to be better, and maybe a coaching change (and subsequent system change) will be to his benefit next year.

What can we expect from him next season?

Ersson had a strong showing at IIHF Worlds, winning all four of his starts and finishing with a .934 SV% 1.16 GAA, outshining veteran netminder Jacob Markstrom. Sure, maybe Ersson faced some lesser competition, but that’s still solid work for a young goalie trying to stake a spot on next year’s Swedish Olympic team. If that international performance helps Ersson build some confidence, and allows him to start the summer on a high, then that can only be a boon for him in the 2025-26 season. With one year remaining on his contract, now’s the time to prove he can handle the bulk of an NHL goalie’s workload–and we still have hopes that he can get there. We have high expectations, though admittedly a tad lower than the same time last year, and hope Rick Tocchet’s system augmentations help Ersson be a better goalie.

How do we grade his 2024-25 season?

Though we can afford some grace for Ersson, given the injuries and time missed, it’s hard to call the season anything other than a failure with some of the worst goaltending numbers in the league. A netminder with designs on being a starter (or at the very least, a 1A) has to be better than that. Sorry, Sam–here’s hoping for the turnaround next year.

Grade: F​


Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/2024-25-player-review-sam-ersson-seriously-struggled/
 
Back
Top