News Flyers Team Notes

2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 18: Cole Reschny could be a future do-it-all, middle-six center

Five spots ago on our BSH Community Draft Board, we profiled Canadian center and U-18 standout Brady Martin. Now, we’ll look at another standout on that Canadian U-18 team, playmaking center Cole Reschny.

As the leading scorer on the WHL’s Victoria Royals, Reschny is now vying to be the first draftee from Victoria ever to be drafted in the first round and to play in a significant amount of NHL games. That’s part of what makes Reschny so impressive in this draft class – he’s doing it as an undersized center, without exceptional tools, in an organization that isn’t exactly known for producing high-end talent and scoring.

When watching Reschny, it’s hard not to really like the style of play that he employs. At 5’11”, he truly plays a big man’s game, can be deployed in all three zones and in all game situations, and is one of the best pure passers in the draft class. If he can improve upon his skating just a bit more, Reschny is a player that has a ton of unlocked potential as a likely effective middle-sixer.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 15 by The Athletic (Scott Wheeler)
No. 33 by Elite Prospects
No. 29 by TSN (Bob McKenzie)
No. 22 by Daily Faceoff

Bio​


DOB: April 6, 2007
Birthplace: Macklin, Saskatchewan, Canada
Position: Center
Height: 5’10”
Weight: 187 lbs
Shoots: Left

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


Arguably more than any other player we’ve profiled thus far, Reschny is an absolute spark plug on the ice, and the engine that makes Victoria run. He’s been used in all game situations, trusted on both the top penalty killing and top power play unit for the Royals, and as the biggest play-driver for Victoria at 5-on-5. With so many doubts about various first-round caliber centers’ ability to stick down the middle, Reschny is the opposite: Unless you are worried about his size, there’s little to no doubt about Reschny’s long-term viability at the position, which would be an undeniable positive from a Flyers perspective. Stylistically, Reschny just looks and plays like a reliable two-way center that can be leaned upon in all areas of the ice.

As mentioned earlier, Reschny plays a big man’s game for a 5’11” forward, and that can be seen by looking where Reschny compiles most of his points. Reschny’s a high volume passer from below the goal line and behind the net, continually looking for open teammates in the slot or right in front of the goaltender. He’s always in and around the puck, hounding defenders on the forecheck or being in perfect positioning to pounce on a mistake. Combining high motor and effort on the forecheck with extremely smart positioning in the offensive zone, Reschny becomes quite the annoying player for opposing defenses to deal with.

The first play shown is really the quintessential Reschny assist. Receiving the puck at the goal line, Reschny (No. 7) skates below the goal line, protects the puck from incoming pressure, skates behind the net, and takes a hit to make a pass back to the middle of the ice for a goal.

Shot wise, Reschny doesn’t have too strong of a slapper, but he can really wire a puck past a goaltender with his wrister. It’s a simple, deceptive release, and Reschny is very good at finding angles/going far side on a goaltender. There’s quite a few plays on Reschny’s tape like the next highlight, where Reschny uses some lateral skating and slick stickwork to create an angle on the goaltender.

But, the most impressive part about Reschny’s goal scoring, similar to his playmaking, is where Reschny scores his goals. So many of Reschny’s highlights come from him fighting for rebounds, winning a battle, willing his way to the front of the net, or deflecting a puck past the goaltender. There’s a certain fearlessness that Reschny has in the offensive zone, completely unafraid to go up against players bigger and stronger than him. Reschny wins enough of those battles to be a darn good player, and that is something that is going to have to continue for him to thrive offensively in the NHL.

On the other side of the puck, Reschny has also gained a reputation as a pretty stout defensive forward, again relying on his positioning to disrupt and begin sequences heading the other way. There are of course times where a player of Reschny’s size is just going to be outmuscled, but Reschny limits these by being almost always in the right position on the ice to nullify things. That’s what has also earned him time on Victoria’s penalty killing units, and what gives Reschny a fairly projectable NHL floor as a bottom sixer.

What’s not to like?


Detractors of Reschny will often point to his skating as a real source of future problem for Reschny, as they argue that players of his stature really need to be a plus skater in order to have a productive NHL career. There are two points about that argument that need a bit of nuance with Reschny. For one, the knock isn’t really that Reschny is a bad skater, it’s that he isn’t a plus skater. Reschny, while he is never going to really blow anyone away, seems to be a perfectly fine skater amongst his peers and for his own game. Two, there’s no real reason why a player of Reschny’s stature can’t make up for average skating with exceptional hockey IQ and puck skills, which Reschny has. The skating being only average could certainly limit Reschny’s ultimate NHL ceiling, but I certainly doubt that it detracts from his ability to be at minimum an effective bottom-six center at the next level.

Naturally, that leads right into the biggest overall flaw with Reschny, in all facets of his game – his overall ceiling. There is likely not top of the lineup potential with Reschny, but that’s also not a reasonable expectation for a team that picks Reschny. As Scott Wheeler points out in his scouting report of Reschny, the highest possible outcome for him looks something like Seth Jarvis, and that would be a darn good outcome for a mid to late first round selection.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?


Reschny would fit really well into the overall scheme that the Flyers have going right now. He’s a playmaking, behind-the-net volume passer, and it’s easy to envision Reschny thriving alongside one or two of the Flyers shoot-first wingers. Reschny would be a player that people would easily come to like in Philadelphia, as Reschny is unafraid to get into the dirty areas that players of his size kinda have to go to in order to have NHL success. There’s a place in any system for players like Reschny, as behind-the-net passing, play-driving, all-situations, middle-six centers often become a coaches’ favorite toy in the NHL.

Could the Flyers actually get him?


Honestly, I could see the Flyers really liking Reschny as a trade-up candidate, if Reschny is still there around picks 19-22. I’m not sure if they’d want to trade all the way into the early teens to get Reschny, but if he goes a bit later than expected, due to concerns about size and skating? Sure. It’s even possible that a guy like Reschny falls to where the Flyers are in the mid-20s with the Avalanche pick, considering the various projections about where Reschny may go in this draft. So, yes, Reschny is very much a possibility for the Flyers with one of their late first rounders, I’m just not actually sure Reschny will actually make it that far into the first round. He’s a scrappy, relatively safe bottom-six projection at worst, and I’m willing to bet some team bites in the 15-18 range.

What scouts are saying


“I’ll admit that at time of writing I watched the Victoria Royals in the playoffs last night and Reschny tore a hole through the net on a 3rd period goal he scored against Tri-City, so it pains me extra to have him this low. Let me be clear, I love Cole Reschny. I really, really want him to be an NHL player because he just does so, so much to earn everything he gets on the ice. 92 points this year were hard-earned through battling under pressure, thinking creatively on the fly, and just showcasing high end cerebral traits that made him a huge, huge threat that has rejuvenated a Victoria Royals organization that has had zero players drafted off their team go to the NHL. Is Reschny the first? I so, so badly want him to be. He’s small, but plays a big man’s game so well at this level. Resilient, adaptive, smart and efficient, he’s anticipating play well, getting plenty of scoring chances from mid-range, and thrives as a playmaker in the offensive zone. A fantastic puck carrier who just doesn’t get much of a chance to carry pucks as much as I’d like, he does lack a level of speed and agility that a player his size likely will desperately need in the NHL in order to produce. To me, it’s a make-or-break level hurdle, but I’m cheering for him the whole way. I could easily see a guy like Reschny slip in the draft into the 3rd round or something and similar to Cameron Reid be a curiosity that could develop into something in time. Last year, Clarke Caswell was the highly intelligent, creative and precise player that was tough to project but was a personal favorite and he fell all the way to the 5th round. If something similar happens to Reschny, he could very easily find his way onto Team Scouching as the second or third name taken off my list.”

Will Scouch, scouching.ca

“Reschny isn’t going to beat you with overwhelming speed, but he will crush you with skill, hockey sense, and supporting efforts. He’s always available off the puck, swinging on the forecheck to add pressure to the equation. If the play shifts high, he shifts to the net, targeting rebounds and fighting through crease resistance. It takes a second for him to create a high danger. In the first, he rolled off a net-front boxout like a basketball player going to the rim. He grabbed a puck down low, shielded, cut back against the grain, and sent a perfect backhand to Killfoil in the hash marks — it should have been a goal. That kind of skill and habit blending is what you get. Reschny layered one-touches, worked give-and-go passing plays, and scored off a perfect activation near-board-to-slot, ripping a low-placed effort under the blocker — he’s clinical in his approach. He was the hero too, rolling off-puck with his Victoria teammate Verhoeff, snapping a weak-side wrist shot to seal the game in overtime. Beyond that, you get involved defensive efforts — disruptive pressure, detached coverage of net-front, secondary threats, and dogged perimeter work. His profile is risky due to his size and skating, but he’s intelligent, can string higher-end tools together, and can support the play, potentially enough to be a middle-six contributor in the NHL. A-grade for our final board — we have underrated his game too much this season.”

David Gee, Elite Prospects Game Report (April 30 U-18s)

“Reschny has been a great WHL player, scoring a lot over his two seasons, including a standout playoff performance this spring for Victoria. He’s a highly skilled and intelligent player who can run a power play like a pro and makes a ton of creative stick handles and passes. He’s a quick skater with good edges who plays with pace and makes high-end plays on the move. He’s not the most dynamic skater for a guy his size, but he will be able to move at an NHL level. He’s on the smaller side, but Reschny can create at the net and kill penalties. He’s played center in junior, showing a diligent two-way game. There’s a chance, due to his size, that he’ll need to be moved to the wing as a pro, but the way he plays could end up with him becoming a potential third-line center as well.”

Corey Pronman, The Athletic



After Cole Reschny comes off, we’ll next add another WHL center to the list, Calgary Hitmen center Benjamin Kindel.

“Kindel was one of the most productive players in junior hockey this season and did most of his damage at even strength to finish one point shy of 100. He also wore a letter for the Hitmen this year and reminds me a little of 2024 first-rounder Terik Parascak as a slightly undersized but opportunistic player whose great sense for timing and spacing helps him get open (though I think his engine runs hotter than Parascak’s). He’s a worker with legit skill and smarts. That combination of effort, sense and talent really blends well together at the junior level, and though he looks a little lean, it doesn’t present itself in his game because of his work rate off the puck. I do find he can slow the play down a little too much at times but he thinks it at a very high level. He’s also got quick hands in tight to his body. His production has skewed toward a setup man profile but his most dangerous weapon offensively might actually be his nifty wrister release, which comes off his stick effortlessly quickly and he’s using more this season. He’s not a super physical player but he wins pucks back with his instincts, drive and positioning and can be relied upon to penalty kill. I’m not sure how his game will translate up levels but he has some believers and he’s a very intellectual, hardworking and skilled junior player. He also has positional versatility and has successfully played both the wing and center after a move back to the middle this year (he played the wing as a 16-year-old).”

Scott Wheeler, The Athletic

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...ould-be-a-future-do-it-all-middle-six-center/
 
Flyers losing Brad Shaw would be disastrous step backward

Brad Shaw should be a head coach in the National Hockey League. He could be in the running for openings in Boston and Seattle should those organizations have the good sense to set up an interview with him. He is a defensive guru who, just with the Flyers alone, has taken pieces of their blue line and steadily made them into competent defenseman. You only have to look at Nick Seeler, Rasmus Ristolainen (when healthy), and Jamie Drysdale to see that Shaw can get surprising results with time and teaching. In Columbus he worked with Zach Werenski, who has nothing but praise for the assistant coach.

However, with the Flyers officially hiring Rick Tocchet to be the 25th head coach in franchise history Wednesday, Shaw’s position with the Flyers is uncertain. It would be disastrous if he was to be on his way out of Philadelphia.

If Tocchet rumbles into town with an preconceived idea of who he wants on his staff and has no need for Shaw’s expertise, then Shaw will be looking for work. And the Flyers will be so much worse off for it. Shaw has proven himself to be an experienced, thoughtful assistant who has the lay of the land when it comes to the Flyers. He knows the ins and outs of the team, and could be called on to help Tocchet adjust to a new team, one with no Quinn Hughes or Elias Pettersson at its disposal. In short, Brad Shaw knows what’s right and what’s wrong with this team heading into 2025-26. Why wouldn’t you want to pick that brain if you’re Tocchet?

But first a little backgrounder. The Philadelphia Flyers showed John Tortorella the door late in the 2024-25 season. The final nail in his coffin was a reported spat he had with defenseman Cam York, the coach allegedly implying he’d make his life a living hell if he signed an extension here and York saying he’d outlast Tortorella. With nine games to go in the season, Shaw was made the interim head coach. The Flyers scored a bit more on the power play, scored a bit more overall and won a few more games. Perhaps most importantly, the locker room seemed a bit lighter, the sticks were gripped a little less tight and mistakes were made without scoldings or benchings (aside from York’s benching in Shaw’s first game as head coach following the fiasco and firing).

When the season ended, Flyers general manager Danny Briere was asked about the search for a head coach and what it would entail. Briere jokingly said he’d love to have a coach that would be with the Flyers for 25 years, so it would make his job a lot easier. However Briere was realistic, trying to walk a fine line between getting a coach that wouldn’t be as stern as Tortorella but, at the same time, not be a door mat the players could walk over.

“First of all I think communication is important, so that’s going to be something we look into,” Briere said during the exit interview press conference in April. “I mentioned the same day we let go of Torts, someone that can come in and teach will be an important one as well. I think communication and teaching are probably two things that will be at the forefront of our next coach. Just when you have a young team in place, I really think those two attributes are extremely important.”

Briere also was pleased with the job Shaw did in the short-term. But at the time, nothing was written in stone as to whether Shaw was the guy or on a possible shortlist to succeed Tortorella. “As far as Shaw goes he did a really good job coming in, kind of a different approach than obviously Torts had,” Briere said. “Some guys really stepped up and seemed like they were a little freer. Shaw will be in the running. We’ll consider him, he’s done a good job. We’ve been impressed with him since he was here, even under Torts. He’ll be in the running. But again, we’re not at that stage yet.”

Shaw also was asked the day before Briere’s presser if he would love to be the next Flyers’ head coach. He was very open to the idea, stating he’d change slightly his approach towards the players but establishing a “level of accountability” with each player. That way if the player screwed up and was disciplined for it (whether reduced ice time or a healthy scratch), the transparency would be apparent from the start. Basically there would be no head games that Tortorella almost thrived on.

Perhaps even more telling was Shaw’s willingness to remain an assistant coach with the Flyers should Briere go in a different direction and hire a head coach not named Brad Shaw. Shaw stated he had “three years invested in the defense corps” while having a good relationship with a “lot of the main players.” He also noted his philosophy for teaching was essentially based on not the mistake the player made and the resulting punishment, but the thought process leading up to the mistake and where they player should’ve done A instead of B.

On April 23, the Flyers announced some additional coaching changes, with assistant coach Rocky Thompson, assistant coach Darryl Williams and skills coach Angelo Ricci let go. Shaw was not one of those named, meaning he was still at the very worst in the running for the head coaching job or possibly sticking around and remaining an assistant. And possibly acting as a locker room ombudsman between the new coach and the players. Should Tocchet opt to not keep Shaw, he’s probably getting off on the wrong foot with the players before they even step on the ice for training camp. The players like Shaw, they respect Shaw, they don’t get away with murder because of it.

As the incoming head coach, Tocchet certainly doesn’t owe Shaw anything. He has every right to bring in his people in attempting to take Philadelphia towards contention. Or the people he thinks are the best for the job. But not taking advantage of an assistant who is willing to swallow his ego or pride to remain the proverbial second-fiddle on the bench to Tocchet would be foolish. Brad Shaw deserves to be a head coach. He probably deserved to be the Flyers head coach moving forward this year. Having him here helps the Philadelphia Flyers, which is all Rick Tocchet should be concerned about. This is a no-brainer. At least it should be. Tocchet hopefully has the smarts to understand this.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/flyers-losing-brad-shaw-would-be-disastrous-step-backward/
 
Flyers re-sign Oscar Eklind to one-year extension

While announcing they hired Rick Tocchet as their head coach yesterday, and the press conference introducing him set for tomorrow, the Philadelphia Flyers today announced they re-signed Lehigh Valley Phantoms forward Oscar Eklind to a one-year extension for next season. The news follows the team re-signing Rodrigo Abols to a one-year, one-way extension.

OFFICIAL: We have re-signed forwards Rodrigo Abols and Oscar Eklind each to one-year contract extensions. #LetsGoFlyers https://t.co/BaR9jMn2rY

— Philadelphia Flyers (@NHLFlyers) May 15, 2025

Eklind, who turns 27 in July, had five goals and 17 assists for 22 points in 64 games during his rookie season playing in North America. The forward also scored a goal in seven playoff games for the Lehigh Valley Phantoms this past season as they defeated Wilkes-Barre/Scranton. They also took two-time defending Calder Cup champions Hershey Bears to five games before losing 4-2 in the fifth and deciding game last weekend.

Philadelphia signed Eklind to a contract in April 2024 after played for Lulea in the Swedish Hockey League. There he scored 17 goals and had 11 assists for 28 points in 48 games. The signing is another good move for Lehigh Valley as Eklind should be a serviceable forward in the American Hockey League but could also be called up on an emergency basis if the Flyers run into a string of injuries during the 2025-26 season. Eklind has the size (6-foot-4, 220 lbs) to be a good bottom six or fourth-line forward in Lehigh Valley. Eklind’s contract is also different from Abols in that it is a two-way contract, meaning Eklind’s salary will fluctuate depending on where he’s playing. Abols is getting paid the same salary regardless of whether he’s with the Flyers or the Phantoms.

With so many young Flyers prospects making their way to Allentown — Denver Barkey, Oliver Bonk, potentially Alex Bump, etc. — that team will need to still have some foundation and not turn into a junior squad trying to fight against weathered veteran-led AHL rosters. Eklind can be that in the bottom six down there.

That makes it two player signings and one coach signing for general manager Danny Briere in the past couple days. Should we expect some more transactions before the week is over?

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...s-re-sign-oscar-eklind-to-one-year-extension/
 
Konecny, Sanheim on board with Rick Tocchet hire for Flyers

The Philadelphia Flyers leadership group in the front office went out and got their guy. We know that Danny Briere and Keith Jones are fans of Rick Tocchet, hiring the former Flyer with a five-year, $26.25-million contract attached.

Tocchet has yet to cross paths with any Flyers players at the NHL level, but he was a part of the Team Canada coaching staff at the 4 Nations Face-Off tournament back in February. Of course, Flyers alternate captain Travis Konecny and veteran defenseman Travis Sanheim were on that Team Canada squad that won gold.

Konecny and Sanheim — and Tyson Foerster — are currently playing for Team Canada at the World Championships in Sweden. Aaron Vickers caught up with the duo on Thursday, and the Travises had nothing but positive things to say about their new coach.

“It’s great,” Konecny said. “Really looking forward to working with him. He seems like a great guy. I’ve heard nothing but good things. And he’s a Flyer. That means something, and he knows that.:

Konecny embodies what it means to be a Flyer with his scoring and feistiness. You can already imagine Tocchet loving what he does on the ice.

“He gets it, I’m sure. It means something to put that jersey on. The city loves their hockey. They love their sports in general. You’ve got to show up to play every night, and I think that’s something that he brought and he’s going to instill in the team.”

Team Canada at the World Championships is loaded with plenty of talented players, including some who have played under Tocchet before. Sanheim has been able to pick their brains a bit on his new bench boss.

“I’ve heard nothing but good things about him from guys that have had him,” he said. “Super excited to get to see what he’s all about as a head coach…

“Obviously (Crosby) had him as an assistant, so it’s a little different, but spoke with him briefly last night at dinner about it, and just kind of getting his thoughts,” Sanheim continued. “Same with other guys. Bo (Horvat) had him for, I think, half a season. Just speaking with different guys, I’ve heard nothing but good things.”

It’s no surprise that players have nothing but good things to say about Tocchet. That was one of the primary reasons that the Flyers wanted to bring him in.

“I think that’s exciting for our organization to be able to bring in a guy like that,” Sanheim concluded.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...m-on-board-with-rick-tocchet-hire-for-flyers/
 
Will the Flyers be the best NHL roster Rick Tocchet’s coached?

Rick Tocchet’s been an NHL head coach for parts of nine seasons with three different franchises–now four, as he’s officially been named the next head coach of the Philadelphia Flyers. His overall record isn’t that exciting (286-265-87), and he’s only taken a team to the playoffs twice, which isn’t all that promising or thrilling.

Most of the teams Tocchet’s coached have stunk, though. The Tampa Bay Lightning were in the depths of a rebuild from 2008 to 2010, and the Arizona Coyotes were a tire fire of a team–there’s a reason the franchise is in Utah now. The Vancouver Canucks are the only team that could be considered “good,” and for one year they were really good and won the Pacific Division. That Canucks roster was flawed, though, and those issues came into full focus during the 2024-25 season. The very public rift between J.T. Miller and Elias Pettersson that forced a trade, Thatcher Demko’s absence, and Quinn Hughes missing significant time due to injury all contributed to a somewhat shocking playoff miss.

All this to ask: Could this Flyers squad be the best roster Tocchet’s ever had as an NHL head coach? Let’s take a look at the teams Tocchet previously coached.

Tampa Bay Lightning, 2008-2010​


Boy, were these bad teams. The only bright spots were young studs Steven Stamkos and Victor Hedman–Stamkos potted 51 goals in 2009-10 as a sophomore, which was cool! A 53-69-26 record for Tocchet was less cool. The rebuild ultimately paid off for the Lightning a decade later, but these were the lean years, and Tocchet had to wear the losses. Neither team drove play (both had sub-50 shot attempt and expected goals share), and their goaltending over .900 both seasons wasn’t terrible.

Their biggest problem was a top-heavy roster: the only players to register over 50 points in either season were Stamkos, Vincent Lecavalier, and Martin St. Louis. In 2008-09, the only player to crack 30 goals was St. Louis; in 2009-10, it was Stamkos. This was a team that struggled to score despite some Hall of Fame talents, and they wound up bottom dwellers as a result. Stars are going to shine, but glass canons rarely win anything meaningful. It’s also worth mentioning that this was Tocchet’s first head coaching gig in the NHL; not everybody nails it out the gate, so we can grant some grace here.

Arizona Coyotes, 2017-2021​


Tocchet had to deal with a rebuilding franchise in Tampa, but Arizona was a different beast entirely. Cheap ownership, no vision, and an unappealing organization made it difficult to field a good team in the desert, and Tocchet’s 125-131-34 record reflected that–and two of those seasons were shortened due to Covid. Across all four seasons, Clayton Keller scored the most total points: 65 in 2017-18 as a 19-year-old rookie. His 0.8 points per game that season was the highest as well, and second place belonged to Phil Kessel in the Covid-shortened 2020-21 season with 0.77 PPG (43 points in 56 games). At least with the Lightning, Tocchet got to watch a 19-year-old Stamkos win the Rocket Richard; the most goals scored by a Coyote was, once again, Keller with 23 in that 2017-18 season.

The only redeeming moment of Tocchet’s tenure with Arizona came during the 2019-20 Covid playoff bubble: the Coyotes somehow won a play-in round, then promptly lost in the first round to the Colorado Avalanche. How he managed that with a roster whose leading scorer was Nick Schmaltz with 45 points is part of what makes hockey so great: anything can happen in a small sample size. It helped that, between Darcy Kuemper, Antti Raanta, and Adin Hill in net, the team had a .922 save percentage overall.

Tocchet was dealt a bad hand with the Coyotes and made the most out of it. Carl Soderberg played a significant role — that’s all you need to know.

Vancouver Canucks, 2022-2025​


Now we get to the first team that could be legitimately considered good: the Vancouver Canucks. Tocchet joined the team mid-season after the firing of Bruce Boudreau; Elias Pettersson was in the midst of a 100-point season, Quinn Hughes was breaking out, and “rookie” Andrei Kuzmenko finished with 39 goals. They couldn’t dig themselves out of their early season hole and missed the playoffs in 2022-23, but we all know what happened next.

Call it luck, call it a hot goalie, call it a PDO bender, call it whatever you want: the 2023-24 Vancouver Canucks were an absolute force. Even after you look past the league-high PDO, that team’s underlying 5-on-5 metrics were still top 10 in the league in nearly every category–they were a good team getting great luck, and it earned Tocchet his first Jack Adams award. It helped that Hughes established himself as one of the best hockey players on the planet, winning the Norris at season’s end, but there were some troubling trends elsewhere: Pettersson fell off hard late in the season, Kuzmenko essentially no-showed, and Thatcher Demko’s injury history reared its ugly head in the playoffs.

The highs of 2023-24 led to some devastating lows in 2024-25. The locker room drama between J.T. Miller and Pettersson finally came into public view (leading to an eventual Miller trade), Demko missed most of the season due to injury, and the team’s second highest scorers behind Hughes were Brock Boeser and Conor Garland with 50 a piece. Hughes, too, missed 14 games due to injury, and the Canucks looked mediocre anytime he wasn’t on the ice. In the end, Vancouver missed the playoffs, and the team’s got an uneasy offseason ahead of it with little clarity of vision for the future.

Philadelphia Flyers, 2025-????​


So, how does the Flyers’ roster stack up to the previous stops on Tocchet’s coaching tour? It’s pretty clearly better than the Arizona Coyotes roster in any given year of Tocchet’s tenure there; hell, you could probably take the five best players on any of those four teams and the Flyers would still be better. Easy answer: the Flyers roster is better.

It’s more difficult to consider Tampa’s roster: they were a team in transition, and Tocchet oversaw the rookie seasons of Stamkos and Hedman–both future captains of the Lightning, and both heading to the Hall of Fame when their careers are over. He also had an ageless Marty St. Louis and still-in-his-prime Vinny Lecavalier in the lineup, and those teams still kind of stunk. This one’s a bit of a toss-up: Tocchet clearly had more stars in the making on that roster, but it lacked the sort of depth the Flyers have in the fold. I’m going to give it to the Flyers, because a budding Matvei Michkov could rival Stamkos in terms of star power, Travis Konecny provides St. Louis-esque scoring potential, and there are promising players at other positions throughout the lineup and in the pipeline.

The Canucks have the strongest case for being the best roster Tocchet has coached. Pettersson at his best is a 100-point top-line center, and Quinn Hughes and Thatcher Demko are perennial season-end awards contenders when healthy; the Flyers don’t have anyone even remotely in that realm. However, again, the Flyers have promising young players throughout the lineup, while the Canucks roster was mostly established veterans: the average age for the Vancouver lineup was 28, while the Flyers’ was 25. If you put more weight in established players, then the Canucks have the better roster; if you consider the potential of youth, the Flyers may have a slight edge long term.

And even not considering their age, during the Canucks’ unreal 2023-24 campaign, beyond the trio of Pettersson, Miller, and Boeser, their most important forwards were Pius Suter and Teddy Blueger. In that same range of usage, last season’s Flyers team had Michkov, Cates, and Tippett below the relied-upon trio of Konecny, Couturier, and Foerster.

So, the Flyers might not have the high-end talent to compare to those Canucks rosters, but they are considerably better when talking about depth. With that, we’ll leave that last one for you to decide.

Stats courtesy Natural Stat Trick

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...be-the-best-nhl-roster-rick-tocchets-coached/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 20: Ben Kindel is a well-rounded sniper

Ben Kindel plays with a noticeable swagger. Whether it’s wiring a one-timer on the power play, or weaving through the neutral zone, Kindel has a confident offensive game with projectable skills that seem primed to translate to the NHL level, to go along with a very intelligent defensive game that allows him to be more than just an out-and-out sniper.

Not often do you see players who find scoring so easy at their current level have the drive and compete level that Kindel has in the more gritty areas of the game, and that is a trait that should endear him to NHL front offices, despite his below-average size.

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


Kindel plays a dynamic offensive game at his own pace. He circles the offensive zone with or without the puck, constantly changing angles and putting himself in dangerous positions to receive the puck in dangerous situations.

And when he gets that puck, he unleashes one of the most devastating shots I’ve seen so far in this draft process.



Wrist, snap, or slap, it doesn’t really matter to Kindel. He picks corners from all over the ice and has a lightning release that sneaks up on goaltenders. His 99 points in 65 games with the Calgary Hitmen was good enough for second on the team, just behind University of Wisconsin commit Oliver Tulk, who’s got a couple years on him. Kindel seems to have an innate sense of how to create offense, and even though the shot is the most flashy part of his game, he is a very capable playmaker who led his team in assists with 64, and he isn’t just a sniper who floats around waiting for his moment to pounce.

He has a quick skating burst, and his top end speed was good enough to break away from WHL defenders with relative ease.

Further to that point, there were some really smart, positive plays made by Kindel on the forecheck. At his size he isn’t exactly going to bowl defenders over, but he uses his smarts to disrupt plays and create turnovers by anticipating plays and getting to the puck first with a quick burst.

Ben Kindel (9 Red) isn’t a Top 10 Pick? LMAO. Surrreeee. Matthew Barzal all over again. pic.twitter.com/pz6IvAuk3C

— Western Hockey Scout (@Pete___Hughes) May 4, 2025

He slows his game down at times, but he is still very comfortable playing at pace and making quick decisions with the puck. That sort of comfortability with playing the game at multiple speeds bodes well for his future, and it suggests maybe some more dynamic potential that can be revealed over time.

Watching Kindel conjures up similar feelings to someone like Jett Luchanko with his very astute and mature two-way game. He has a lot of really projectable traits that make him a bit more versatile than just your average go-for-broke sniper. If he doesn’t transform into a 35+ goal scorer at the NHL level, he still has a very good chance to stick around and be an impact player lower down the lineup, who has the ability to go on hot stretches. He really works hard out there, and it’s a good sign to see that he doesn’t just rely on his point scoring to do all the heavy lifting, and seems to be keen on putting in the same level of effort all over the ice.

He played center at times for the Hitmen as well, which just shows how much faith the team ultimately had in his 200-foot game, even if that projection may be a bit far-fetched for the NHL-level.

What’s not to like?​


Kindel is a bit small, and that will always affect his draft stock. Listed at 5’10, 176 pounds, he could stand to bulk up a bit at least, and that may inhibit his ability to really be able to stick as an NHL centerman. Other than that, there’s not a ton about Kindel’s game that is lacking, rather, it is another situation where you are left wondering just how effective he can be as an NHL scorer.

He has slowly become one of my favorite options late in round one, but even still there are obvious questions about what he can ultimately become in the NHL, and if he’ll one day be able to really dominate. Kindel finds himself caught in a situation that many late first round wingers experience as they transition to the pro game: what happens if their scoring isn’t good enough to keep them in an NHL top-6 consistently. Morgan Frost is one of my favorite examples of such a phenomenon, where he obviously has playmaking skill and real offensive abilities, but the numbers simply aren’t good enough to justify putting him with the players that he would need to play with in order to thrive.

Kindel isn’t some massive play driving beast, and he does a lot of his best work in conjunction with his teammates. That isn’t a problem, but it is key to note that he just probably isn’t going to be a guy who creates something out of nothing for himself, at the NHL level.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?​


Kindel would fit in nicely with the Flyers, but it’s more than just adding his weapon of a shot to a power play desperate for some sort of new blood. His high motor game and tenacious work ethic fits in well with the ethos of the kind of scrappy team the Flyers have been building over their time under John Tortorella, and will likely continue to build under Rick Tocchet.

He would be another added goal scoring option to a team that struggles with finding out-and-out snipers, and even if he doesn’t find his footing right away, he can still contribute in other ways that will cement him as a positive force in a lineup even if he goes through a slump. As the Flyers continue to amass two-way players like Luchanko, Tyson Foerster, and Noah Cates, Kindel would fit right in alongside them, while still offering that potential offensive upside that you expect from a first round winger.

Could the Flyers actually get him?​


Kindel seems like a prime target for either one of the two Flyers’ late first rounders. Danny Briere is not a general manager who allows size to make decisions for him automatically, so there is a very good chance that if Kindel slides into the twenties, that Briere will look at him as a no-brainer swing with very minimal risk involved. There is a chance he goes in the teens, especially after a really solid all-around showing at the U-18 world championships with Canada, where he demonstrated every positive aspect of his game over the gold medal run.

Kindel seems like a very Briere-esque player in my opinion, so there’s a chance they’re a bit higher than consensus on a guy with no real glaring holes in his game. A trade up cannot be ruled out, I just think if the Flyers did decide to move up with a combination of their later picks, it would be to select someone just a bit more highly touted than Kindel.

What scouts are saying​


“Kindel was one of the most productive players in junior hockey this season and did most of his damage at even strength to finish one point shy of 100. He also wore a letter for the Hitmen this year and reminds me a little of 2024 first-rounder Terik Parascak as a slightly undersized but opportunistic player whose great sense for timing and spacing helps him get open (though I think his engine runs hotter than Parascak’s). He’s a worker with legit skill and smarts.” – Scott Wheeler

The right-shot forward can play anywhere in a lineup and is versatile enough to play in all situations. Kindel has been a standout scorer and has won 51.4 percent of his face-offs this season. He’ll go to the hard areas of the ice to create offense, a quality very endearing to NHL scouts, but he’ll need to increase his strength before playing at the next level. Kindel considers himself a playmaker and compares his style to that of Canadiens forward Nick Suzuki.” – Mike Morreale

“Kindel has a role as a power play quarterback, which speaks to his vision and playmaking ability. Despite his current size, Kindel isn’t shy about taking the puck to the net off the rush or setting up around his opponent’s net searching for tips and rebounds.” – Jason Bukala



As we get into the 20’s, it’s tome for another name to be added to the voting pool. This time it is Rouyn-Noranda centerman Bill Zonnon.

Zonnon has been a top player for Rouyn-Noranda for the past two seasons. Zonnon checks a lot of boxes NHL teams will be looking for. He’s a big, fast center with a skating stride that will easily translate to the NHL. He has good stick skills and can create offense on the move. He’s been a big scorer in the QMJHL, but I wouldn’t call him an overly instinctive offensive type. He can make some plays, and has a decent shot too, but it looks like more secondary skill at the top level. He works well enough off the puck and could have two-way value as a pro. He has a chance to be a middle-six forward in the middle or on the wing.” – Corey Pronman

Source


Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...rd-no-20-ben-kindel-is-a-well-rounded-sniper/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 21: Logan Hensler brings a well-balanced defensive game

As we settle into the 20s in our ranking, we’re back to introduce Logan Hensler, an intriguing presence in this middle of the first round group of defenders.

Having made the jump to the college level early, Hensler wrapped up his freshman season at Wisconsin earlier this spring, and despite the team struggling to put together positive results on a collective level, Hensler settled in nicely as the season went on. And despite some lackluster counting stats at both the NCAA and World Junior levels this year, there’s a lot to like in the complete package Hensler brings, and he could be a intriguing option for a team looking to add a well-balanced defender into the mix in their prospect pool.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 12 by NHL Central Scouting (NA Skaters)
No. 15 by Elite Prospects
No. 11 by TSN/Bob McKenzie
No. 15 by Daily Faceoff

Bio​


DOB: October 14, 2006
Birthplace: Woodbury, MN
Position: RHD
Height: 6’2″
Weight: 196 lbs
Shoots: Right

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


Hensler was projected to go in the top-10 on a number of lists heading into this season, and even if he didn’t have quite the season that some of those pundits might have been expecting, it’s still clear why he came into this year so highly touted. The most basic of whys here is the fact that he’s a right shooting defenseman with good size — it is basic, but there’s always going to be value in a player who ticks those boxes, without fail.

Of course, there’s much more to his game than just that. He’s particularly effective in his rush defense, in his ability to keep pace well with opponents and having shown some strength in breaking up plays not just when they’ve already made it into his defensive zone, but also in stepping up to break up those chances in the neutral zone before they have a chance to become dangerous. This is valuable in isolation, to be sure, but particularly within the scope of the modern game which often feels like it’s trending more rush-based. Beyond that, this in-zone defense, too, is solid, if not overly flashy. His most-utilized tool (at times to excess) is a good active stick, and while there are certainly times when he could do well to make a stronger secondary effort if the initial play fails, he has still shown that he can engage physically and has asserted himself as a strong player along the boards who can put in that work to get pucks off of opponents.

In all areas of his game, his skating is an asset. While he’s not an outright burner, his stride is smooth and he’s able to get up to a good speed with relative ease, even if it’s not absolutely scorching. The mechanics of his stride overall are strong, and he’s mobile in all four directions, which allows him to close gaps on puck carriers efficiently, while giving him a bit of slipperiness when he’s the one carrying the puck.

There hasn’t been heaps of offense showing in Hensler’s game, but he’s brought some interesting flashes of both individual offense but also work to support his teammates in this area. His strong skating makes him an option to help create some rush plays on his own, freeing up space for the forwards to get into more dangerous shooting positions. He has some good power in his shot, but he’s struggled a bit to actually get those pucks through traffic and on net. His hands in close, too, look like they could be something, and he’s shown some flashes as well of looking dynamic when he’s activating in the offensive zone, so there does still seem to be some notable finesse to his game. Along with that, he’s been more consistent in his ability to find teammates in space on long passes to stretch the ice, and in-zone, he can make those nice little chip passes in closer quarters to keep cycles alive. Overall, too, he shows good patience with the puck, and protects it well when he does have it.

And, back in the big picture, despite his Badgers team finishing the season second from the bottom in their conference, there’s still value to him being “ahead of the curve” developmentally, having gotten those significant college minutes already in his draft year, and gotten a jump on developing himself physically in a college program, playing against much older players.

What’s not to like?​


I like the blurb on him from Dobber Prospects, describing him as a “mobile rush defender with the ability (though not always the inclination) to move the puck with his feet,” and I think that’s pretty succinct. This is to say that there’s some really notable tools here for Hensler, but he’s had some trouble putting them all together on a consistent basis. And while this isn’t expressly a negative — none of these players are coming out of their draft year as fully formed professionals, after all — it does leave some questions for teams looking to pick him up as to how to approach his development. Is it going to take a firmer hand from their staff — and do they think their staff is best suited for this in the first place — or do they trust him to be able to develop well on a Wisconsin team that has not been the strongest in developing players over this last little while. He’s a prospect that needs some developing, and it will be a balancing act to make sure he gets it, too be sure.

His situation has more question marks than outright negatives, it feels safe to say, and another is around his upside, generally speaking. That is, as we mentioned above, Hensler shows some real flashes of positive playmaking and generally high-end play, but that’s all it’s been, only flashes. More often, he can be seen hanging back a bit in the offensive zone and not being quite so involved. Now, some of this might be confidence related, and one wonders if this might be a case of being on a struggling team can foster a more conservative game in young players, as they’re afraid to make mistakes. It’s hard to say whether this is or is not for sure the case, but it will be interesting to see how things trend for him next season, as Wisconsin looks to take a step forward. But, for now, we’re left at something of a strange limbo point, where we see a player in Hensler who has some interesting tools, but hasn’t been able to fully actualize his game to move into the realm of the truly exciting. There might well be potential for more, but that’s hard to call a sure thing at the moment, which means if he’s taken high in this draft, it will be by someone taking a bit of a swing on him.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?​


The question of fit here is definitely an interesting one. The Flyers are pretty flush with smaller, more offensive minded defensemen in their system, and while that’s certainly not a bad excess to have, they’ve been making what feels like a concerted effort over these last couple of years to balance out the pool a bit, adding a bit more size, and adding a bit more defensive steadiness. In this regard, Hensler would be a good add for them — while there is clearly some level of offensive instinct in him, his game leans more in the defense-first direction, and in him they could find a nice bit of defensive stability to anchor a pair and allow a more offensively minded partner some more space to work.

The question, though, becomes whether the team would feel confident enough that his production would set him apart enough from the others in the pipeline to justify a reasonably high pick. That is, the Flyers have a not insignificant group of defense prospects in the pipeline who are in the “might pan out to be a decent depth option at the NHL level, but we’ll see” kind of department, and if the Flyers have some belief that they could tap into more of his potential, there could be a fit there, but if they’re more on the side of some of the more skeptical pundits and think he might be of a similar ilk, the pick might be better spent elsewhere.

Could the Flyers actually get him?​


As far as the projections go, Hensler’s hanging out in that kind of murky middle zone where it looks like there isn’t a whole lot of consensus around where these players will go, and a whole lot of potential ways things could break. With that in mind, there’s certainly some real potential that he’ll still be on the board when the Flyers’ later first-round picks roll around, but equally, there’s potential that another team will have grabbed him up in the early teens, well out of their reach. So it goes.

What scouts are saying​


“I see an NHL player in Hensler, but I’m not sure exactly what he’ll do there. He’s mobile, there’s some skill there, and he’s got some good defensive fundamentals, especially on defensive cycles and on the physical side. His metrics across the board are… fine? He’s a smart, safe passer who has had some eyebrow-raising moments in the offensive zone to create chances, he doesn’t pepper the net with shots to get cheap production, and his defensive transition metrics are solid. As a safe, shutdown guy down your lineup, there’s a future there, but you see moments of something more… I just don’t know what the end result is. He’s gotten better as the year has worn on looking more comfortable at NCAA pace, connecting on more passes and gaining some offensive zone confidence. Wisconsin remains a perplexing team/program so I’m not sure how much that factors into what is holding Hensler back, but I felt his World Junior performance was pretty ho-hum, and I’m always a little bit wary of “good at lots of stuff but great at nothing” profiles projecting to high-end NHL roles. He’s got the size, physical edge, skating ability and simple execution on the puck to find some kind of job, but where he goes in the draft? I have no clue but anywhere in the range of this tier would not surprise me in the slightest. He’s improved over the season quite a lot, looking more fluid, mobile and assertive which is a welcome development.”
Will Scouch, scouching.ca

“Hensler defends with discipline and intelligence, maintaining strong gaps and showing excellent positioning in his own zone. He reads plays well, stays composed under pressure, and consistently makes smart decisions with the puck. While he isn’t going to rack up big offensive numbers, his mobility allows him to retrieve pucks efficiently and make clean zone exits, which is a critical trait for modern defensemen.

“Hensler is a puck-moving, two-way defender who plays a safe and consistent game. He brings stability to his own end, and coaches can rely on him in all situations, though his offensive output has been somewhat lacking this season. While he has never been a major offensive presence, I did expect a little more. What stands out is his overall presence—he plays safely, isn’t overly noticeable on the ice, but consistently does all the right things. He moves the puck extremely well and is a reliable presence on every shift. In this game, Hensler was once again consistent, reliable, and not particularly visible in a flashy way. He initiated many breakouts but rarely joined the attack in a meaningful way.
Samuel Tirpak, FCHockey



One player departs, another joins the mix. Today’s addition to the poll is the, shall we say, worldly center Ivan Ryabkin:

“Ryabkin is a wild card to keep an eye on in the first round. It’s a realistic thought that a team will be more aggressive and call his name before this slot. My concerns regarding Ryabkin’s ability to create offence, and score goals, is minimal. What I’m more concerned about is his fitness – which is a choice – and the overall pace he plays the game. When the game is more predictable, and in control for his team, Ryabkin’s skill definitely shines on the power play. It’s undeniable that he’s coming into his own at the USHL level, however, and his stats don’t lie. Ryabkin has 7G-4A in his most recent 10-game segment.”
Jason Bukala, Sportsnet

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...ensler-brings-a-well-balanced-defensive-game/
 
Friedman: Brad Shaw ‘really wanted’ Flyers head coach job

The Philadelphia Flyers named their 25th head coach in franchise history this week. Interim head coach Brad Shaw had been in the conversation for the full-time job with the club, but Danny Briere and Keith Jones elected to go with the more experienced Rick Tocchet.

Tocchet was introduced on Friday morning after it was reported that Shaw would not return as an assistant coach on his staff. Shaw was responsible for coaching the defense during his time in Philadelphia, and many of the blueliners took steps forward under his watch.

It’s understandable that Shaw wouldn’t want to coach under the guy who beat him out for the job, and even more so after hearing what Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman had to say about the situation on this week’s 32 Thoughts: The Podcast.

“I’m curious about his bench. I believe it was Charlie O’Connor who was the first guy to report that Brad Shaw won’t be coming back. Now that’s a loss for Philly,” Friedman said. “Their (defense) really liked him. He, in particular, did excellent work with (Rasmus) Ristolainen and kind of rejuvenated him.

“Shaw really wanted this job. I think he was really hoping that he would get this job. Like I said, I always believed Tocchet was going to get there, but even I had some doubt the way things kind of unfolded over the past couple of weeks.

“If you’re Brad Shaw, you’re hearing some of this doubt and you’re saying ‘OK, OK, OK. I might be able to get this.’ And the longer it goes the more you’re disappointed. I understand all that. Nobody did anything wrong here. The Flyers didn’t do anything wrong. Shaw didn’t do anything wrong. But it’s kind of like dating … You ask somebody out, you’re with them for a little bit of time, and they’re like ‘eh, I like this person a little better.’ Not everybody is wired to go back to the friendship zone.”

Friedman noted that Shaw may now have some options across the league after proving his defensive prowess in Philadelphia. He also mentioned a name to watch as Tocchet’s assistant.

“One of the guys I wonder about for Tocchet is another Flyer, Luke Richardson. I think Luke Richardson’s a really good coach,” Friedman continued. “I think he’s a really good coach, and people respect hi,m and people really like him, and he’s a good teacher. I wonder if he could be a fit on that Philly bench.”

Friedman went on to say that this is the “proper marriage” between Tocchet and the Flyers, saying that it’s the “way it should be.”

Ultimately, Friedman agrees that Tocchet will be more than just the guy behind the bench in Philadelphia.

“I think it’s interesting to hear how a lot of the early narrative coming out of the reporters from Philly is that Tocchet will be able to get players to come play for Philadelphia. He is a popular guy. He is a guy that players like playing for, a lot of them. I think that’s interesting,” Friedman said. “I’ve believed for a while now that the Flyers are going to be active, really active. And Tocchet and this kind of talk around him, that doesn’t make me think believing that is wrong. He’s going to be like an NCAA coach. He’s not just going to be your bench boss and your strategist, he’s going to be a recruiter.”

It sure seems like Tocchet is a coach that players are going to want to play for, and the Flyers have a few big offseasons coming up as they look to take that next step in this New Era of Orange.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...rad-shaw-really-wanted-flyers-head-coach-job/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 22: Braeden Cootes is a center who can do it all

As we round out the weekend, the draft board turns to an exciting center prospect in Braeden Cootes out of Seattle in the WHL.

Cootes has been having a pretty stellar season, finding a nice bit of success at just about every turn –he posted positive results through the regular season on a somewhat middling Thunderbirds team, and captained the Canadian team at the U18s on their way to a gold medal. He’s made a name for himself as an intriguing, quite complete player already at the junior level, and might well be just the type of player a team like the Flyers would be looking to target later in the first round as they look to bolster their pipeline down the middle.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 20 by NHL Central Scouting (NA Skaters)
No. 17 by Elite Prospects
No. 22 by TSN/Bob McKenzie
No. 28 by Daily Faceoff

Bio​


DOB: February 9, 2007
Birthplace: Sherwood Park, AB, CAN
Position: C
Height: 6’0″
Weight: 183 lbs
Shoots: Right

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


Above all, Cootes is a well-rounded player. Now, this might sound like a boring assessment, like the makings of a player whose potential fit in this organization doesn’t exactly excite, but the mix of skill he brings along with his responsible game does bring some more excitement. All the same, we’ll dig into the defensive game first here.

Cootes’s in-zone defense is really notable, the way he’s able to stick to his defensive assignment but doesn’t overcommit to it — that is, he stays with his man, but he’s constantly still scanning the zone and keeping engaged with the direction of play while the puck is away from them, ready to jump on a pass attempt. He gives himself options, in other words. And supporting that work nicely is the quick stick he brings, as he’s effective in chipping pucks away from opponents and getting play moving in the right direction. Even if he’s not the one to come away with the puck and start up that transition, he gets it into a good spot for a teammate to pick up. There’s a lot of patience in his play, in the way that he’s able to check and release and then regroup to get back after the puck. It shows a high level of hockey sense that he’s sort of constantly reevaluating his situation for the right play, and not getting drawn into making a panic play either at or with the puck.

His checking game on the whole is quite well developed, and he brings not just good raw speed but good pace in this regard. There’s also a relatively low level of risk in his game, because he plays it so smart. He’s not an overly physical player, but he picks his spots well, and has shown some strength in battles along the boards and below the goal line. On top of that, he’s a strong skater overall, good on his edges, and his top end speed is pretty notable, but even more so is his sort of short distance, in-zone quickness, which gives him even more of an advantage as a forechecker.

There’s also some notable offensive upside here, in Cooter’s game. The point totals don’t totally blow you out of the water (though over a point per game is nothing to sniff at) they’re still more than respectable when you take into account the fact that he did it on a sort of middling Seattle team. He has a really excellent ability to create passing lanes, which is an asset in the defensive zone to create breakouts to be sure, but also in the offensive zone to set up quality chances for his teammates. We mentioned his strength below the goal line in the defensive zone, and that comes across in the offensive zone too, and he’s able to come away from battles with the puck and get it into dangerous areas for chances. He’s more of a setup guy, has a real strength for funneling pucks to the middle of the ice, but there’s some individual offense there too — he has a good shot, with a quick release and good bit of power, so he can set up and find some success as a shooting threat as well.

What’s not to like?​


One of the big questions here — no pun intended — is the size question. Cootes brings decent size, but he’s not huge, and might still be considered undersized (at 6’0) for an NHL center, at least by some. Now, this on its own might not be a big red flag in isolation, but the bigger concern in a more practical sense will be how he’s able to add more strength to help him in his physical battles, which can be a bit of a weak point.

On the whole though, there aren’t really any big holes in Cootes’s game, and it’s rather more an issue of him continuing to work on things that he’s already reasonably good at. That is, for one, he’s already a strong skater, but there’s room for improvement, and getting more power in his stride would go a long way. Additionally, he’s already shown well as a confident puck carrier, but he has a tendency to skate himself into trouble at times, so he’ll have to keep working at choosing his spots a little better. It’s a matter of tinkering with his game to put him in a better position as he continues to move up the levels of play, but nothing’s in need of overhauling.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?​


From a purely positional standpoint, the addition of another center like Cootes would be a huge boost to the Flyers, as this is still a position of pretty desperate need both at the NHL level currently and within the pipeline. But, stylistically, too, there’s a lot to like about the fit. With the attention to detail he brings, the well-rounded, hard working style of play, it feels like he’s exactly the type of player that the Flyers would like to see in the mix.

Now, some might be concerned about a perceived lack of size down the middle with him and Jett Luchanko looking to find roles in their top-9, but that sort of comes down to personal preoccupation. For whatever it’s worth, we don’t share that concern and instead find more value in the speed and mobility that they both would bring.

Also, come on, how funny would it be to have another Coot[e]s in the system?

Could the Flyers actually get him?​


The range of projections for where Cootes will likely go isn’t too wide-ranging, and he’s largely settled in to that back third of the first round. Now, certainly there are a lot of ways that the pieces can fall in that range, depending on how the middle of the round falls, but it’s pretty safe to say that there’s a good chance that Cootes could be an option for the Flyers for with one of their later in the round picks, but it’s not a certainty.

What scouts are saying​


“I had a bit of a revelation a few weeks back while speaking with a devoted subscriber of the project where a lot of the things I really love and a lot of the things people question about Braeden Cootes are similar to the chatter about Marat Khusnutdinov all those years ago. Undersized and not the most productive guy playing centre, Cootes is still an easy case to see playing in the middle of an NHL lineup somewhere. The analytical profile isn’t great, but where it’s good, it’s very good. His speed and off-puck anticipation go hand in hand to make a great defense-first centre who carries the puck very well and has a skill level that he can deploy at a high pace of play. I think there’s a good floor to his future, but I do want to see more out of him. Quicker decisions through his passing, another step of quickness to evade and escape pressure, and more attempts to drive into the middle of the ice for scoring chances, but he has some really impressive moments with a combination of talents that a smart team should recognize could play a competitive role down a lineup regardless of his size.”
Will Scouch, scouching.ca

“Cootes plays a heavy, north-south game with a nonstop motor, providing size, grit, and reliability in all three zones. He’s the type of player who wears opponents down with relentless forechecking, excels in puck battles, and doesn’t take shifts off. His right-handed shot adds a layer of utility, especially in faceoff situations and special teams deployment. Though he won’t drive offense in the same way more skilled pivots might, his defensive awareness and ability to play in high-effort matchups make him a strong candidate for a shutdown or energy role at the next level.

“Cootes is a two-way right-shot center with a blend of grit, skill, and compete. He’s an all-situations pivot who can play a tenacious game, is usually the first to arrive on loose pucks, and is willing to go to the hard areas of the offensive zone — not shy to plant himself in front of the opposition’s net. He doesn’t take too much time getting there, either, instead driving to the blue paint with his stick down on the ice for passes or deflections. Cootes zips passes with intention, and doesn’t second-guess his initial instinct when making a dish. He shows quick decision making when presented with little time and space in the offensive zone, and has a good sense of where his teammates are, or are going to be, on the attack. He has the ability to draw defenders in close to him before making a pass, though he doesn’t have dynamic stickhandling ability.”
Aaron Vickers, FCHockey



One player departs, another joins the mix. We’ll stick around in the WHL for a little while longer, and welcome speedy winger Cameron Schmidt out of Vancouver:

“Schmidt possesses game-breaking skill. He’s like a lightning bolt — in a second, he can generate a high-danger chance. An example of this came in the third. He snuck into open ice, took a breakaway feed, flashed deception with his eyeline and body, and nearly scored on a forehand pop. Just after, Schmidt deked around a defender, baiting a shot, and nearly roofed a backhand effort. The biggest issue is that lightning doesn’t strike consistently, and without puck touches, his game disappears in the background. The speed he can push is impressive — he had a tap-by rush where he exploded up the boards, deked to the backhand, and ripped an in-stride wrister. Beyond the mentioned plays, that was about all of his contributions in this game. He was light on the forecheck and had some pacey moments, but his game was extremely quick-strike and individualistic, devoid of building plays and connections. With his size concerns, his projection requires a lot of conviction. He’s likely more of a B-grade if he fails to rack up offensive chances — high upside, but extreme uncertainty.”
–Daniel Gee, Elite Prospects

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...braeden-cootes-is-a-center-who-can-do-it-all/
 
Monday Morning Fly By: On to the next

*Folks! It’s been a busy weekend somehow and we’ve got a lot to catch up on. At the top of that list, a whole lot of new coach related happenings and musings. First up: Danny Briere and new head coach Rick Tocchet met with the media for the first time since the hiring on Friday, and here’s the big highlight of what was said. [BSH]

*And some more from the new head coach — a bit of insight into his hopes and strategies for this new team. [Inquirer]

*From a Canucks watcher point of view, here’s what we might expect to see from Tocchet as he begins his Flyers tenure. [BSH]

*So like. This kind of feels like an old boys club hire, but is it really? [PHLY]

*Also, is this Flyers roster the best one he’s had at his disposal in his head coaching career? [BSH]

*Tocchet might well help the Flyers strike a balance here between tapping into some of the positive Tortorella-like qualities, while being able to make some headways in areas where he was lagging. [PHLY]

*The Tocchet hiring also, of course, meant that Brad Shaw opted not to stick around after losing out on a job that he really wanted. [BSH]

*We’re continuing to roll through our season grades over here, and this weekend we officially closed the book on the Morgan Frost and Joel Farabee chapters.

*Finally, the draft board presses on! On Friday, we were introduced to fun, sniping (but still well-rounded) Ben Kindel. [BSH]

*And then on Saturday we added a big right shooting defenseman to the mix in Logan Hensler. [BSH]

*And yesterday Braeden Cootes, a center who plays simply such an ideal Flyers game, joined the board. Who will be next! [BSH]

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/monday-morning-fly-by-on-to-the-next/
 
Breaking down some trends in Rick Tocchet-coached teams

USATSI_20248818_168402730_lowres.jpg


Rick Tocchet’s coaching record won’t be mistaken for Scotty Bowman’s anytime soon. He is marginally over .500 over his three tenures with Tampa Bay, Arizona and Vancouver. But over that time, there are a few things which he seems to have his teams do well. And other things which are still works in progress for the 61-year-old coach. Here then are a handful of trends that have transpired over Tocchet’s time behind the bench. Some that can result in praise or scorn for Tocchet, depending on the criteria in question.

Winning streaks, losing streaks

No team under Rick Tocchet has gone on a massive tear, meaning he hasn’t had a team he’s coached go more than on a six-game winning streak. That was with the Coyotes during 2018-19. So if a team is buried in the standings looking to gain ground, or looking to gain some distance from lesser thans during the season, Tocchet hasn’t been behind the bench for it. However, there is a first time for everything, right?

In terms of losing streaks, he’s had his share. In 2008-09 during his first year with Tampa Bay, Tocchet had not one but two nine-game winless streaks over 66 games (he replaced Barry Melrose 16 games into the season). One of those came at the end of the year. In 2017-18, his first year with Arizona, the Coyotes started the season with an 11-game winless streak. Later that year they endured a seven-game winless streak. A handful of five-game winless streaks have also been sprinkled throughout his coaching tenure.

Generally mediocre to slow starts

Tocchet’s fastest start out of the gate was when Vancouver opened the 2023-24 season going 7-2-1. He also went 6-3-1 to start the 2019-20 season with Arizona. On the other side of the spectrum, the 2017-18 season was bad as mentioned before, where he went 0-9-1 to start the year. And in his first year with the Lightning he was 1-5-4 to start the year. So needless to say, not every team Tocchet has led has come out of the gates on fire.

Generally Tocchet has been around .500 when it comes to the opening 10-game segment. This was the case in 2009-10 with Tampa (4-3-3) and again in 2018-19 with the Coyotes (5-5-0). So although every team is different and Tocchet is entering Philadelphia with a new team, an incredibly red hot start to open 2025-26 would be a welcomed surprise. A start as horrid as he had back in 2017-18 wouldn’t be great, particularly given the expectations the organization might have on being a playoff contender.

Underlying metrics not great

While people with far more experience than this writer can break down the minutiae of analytics far better, generally the underlying metrics for Tocchet’s teams outside of his Jack Adams year have been average to below average. In layman’s terms, Tocchet’s coaching seasons saw his teams fall just short of the magic 50 per cent mark which often measures how a team is competing against its opposition. Again, the statistics are for the seasons Tocchet coached from start to finish. They don’t include the years he was brought in during the season as a replacement or interim coach. All statistics are also for five-on-five situations.

The Jack Adams Award-winning season saw all four metrics over 50 per cent, including the goals for percentage over a ridiculously good 57 per cent. When those four stats in 2023-24 came falling back down to earth the following season, Tocchet was feeling a bit more heat.

SeasonCF%GF%xGF%HDCF%
2009-1047.6646.0848.2248.53
2017-1848.1046.0547.3147.23
2018-1948.8545.4950.0848.09
2019-2048.3750.2048.9648.47
2020-2148.7546.0148.6447.57
2023-2451.4557.8952.2854.08
2024-2549.0848.2449.5048.18

Goals for, goals against

For goals for and goals against, the seasons where Tocchet replaced Barry Melrose in Tampa Bay and Bruce Boudreau in Vancouver weren’t included as they were partial seasons for Tocchet. Of the seven seasons included, Tocchet’s teams have cracked the top ten offensively only once as the 2023-24 Canucks were sixth overall with 279 goals. The next highest ranking in the remaining seasons was twenty-second when the 2019-20 Arizona Coyotes scored 190 goals in the slightly shortened season. On three separate occasions Tocchet’s teams have ranked twenty-third in goals for (2009-10 with Tampa Bay, 2020-21 with Arizona and 2024-25 with Vancouver).

On the other side of the puck, Tocchet has been a bit better. Three of the seven seasons has seen his teams rank in the top six overall. In 2018-19 with Arizona gave up only 220 goals which put them fifth overall in goals against. The following season they tightened the screws a bit more, allowing only 185 goals which put them third overall. And in Tocchet’s first full season with the Canucks (2023-24), Vancouver ranked fifth in goals against with 227 allowed. So in short, Tocchet has a slightly better grip on how to keep the puck out of the net than he does putting it in the net. How this defensive ranking fares with the franchise-worst goaltending the Flyers got this past season remains to be seen.

If the front office can somehow mend the goaltending issue this summer, things should be better and there will be more W’s in that column. Or if Sam Ersson can somehow find himself most evenings north of the .900 save percentage versus south, then Tocchet’s job (barring a string of injuries or key players out) gets a hell of a lot easier.

The power play should be better, the penalty kill too

The Flyers’ power play doesn’t have Rocky Thompson anymore. In his opening press conference Friday, Tocchet said he had some ideas on how to possibly improve the awful man advantage but didn’t get into specifics. The good thing is the last three full seasons he’s coached, Tocchet’s teams have been above the league average regarding the power play. As for the penalty kill, the previous five seasons he’s coached his teams have been above average down a man. Of course, Flyers fans would plan a parade if the team somehow ended up with a 17 to 19 per cent power play effectiveness at season’s end. But the numbers seem to indicate Tocchet knows how to not run a power play into the ground like previous people in charge did the last few seasons.

SeasonPower play efficiency %League average %Penalty kill efficiency %League average %
2009-1017.7818.9578.0281.05
2017-1816.8720.1879.4679.82
2018-1916.2819.7884.9680.22
2019-2019.1620.0382.7479.97
2020-2120.7919.7880.8480.22
2023-2422.5720.9879.1379.02
2024-2522.5221.6482.5978.36

Can shut the door after 40!

Although some skeptics might suggest it’s unlikely a team leading after two periods can easily blow leads, nearly all of Tocchet’s teams he coached for full seasons have been shutdown teams. That is to say they can hold onto a lead and get a win when they’re winning after 40 minutes. And given the record Tocchet has, the statistics almost make you want to smile. It’s perhaps even better than the near certainty the Flyers under Alain Vigneault in the 2019-20 season before the pandemic changed everything. It seems so long ago.

Granted, Tocchet’s teams weren’t exactly terrific in overcoming deficits after two periods. But we’ll let the numbers speak for themselves (note: the situational records for Tocchet’s first full season in Tampa Bay in 2009-10 weren’t available). If Tocchet is able to get the Flyers to avoid some blown leads late in contests, those regulation wins could come in quite handy if they’re fortunate enough to remain in the playoff chase this coming season.

SeasonRecord when leading after two periodsRecord when trailing after two periods
2017-1821-6-44-26-4
2018-1929-1-13-26-4
2019-2022-1-42-19-0
2020-2112-2-03-16-3
2023-2442-1-43-14-2
2024-2527-1-83-20-5
TOTAL153-12-2118-121-18

So, in summary

The upside can be found in some of this information. If they Flyers are looking for a coach who knows how to maintain a lead with the opposing goalie pulled late in the third, they probably found their guy. If they are looking to improve their power play and special teams overall, no team he’s led for an entire season has been under 16 per cent up a skater. So Tocchet’s worst season with the power play is an improvement on 2024-25’s Flyers fiasco. Same goes for the penalty killing, one of the better parts of their game under Tortorella until that lost its way and began to plummet.

Of course these numbers can show some examples of what Tocchet does well and what he needs to enhance. The key is for him to get the most out of the Flyers roster, however that looks when September’s training camp rolls around. One thing is for certain: the Flyers have turned the page and are entering a slightly new chapter in the rebuild. Whether it pans our or not remains to be seen. Hiring Tocchet shouldn’t hinder the development, but whether it’s enough to get them to the promised land is another story.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/breaking-down-some-trends-in-rick-tocchet-coached-teams/
 
Tuesday Morning Fly By: Restless already

*It was a quiet start to the week with absolutely zero hockey on the schedule, but we’re still here talking a lot of hockey. First, looking at some of the trends in Rick Tocchet’s head coaching career, and what they might leave us with as far as expectations go. [BSH]

*And there was one notable piece of that track record which impressed and enticed the Flyers the most. [NBCSP]

*It’s almost sure to be an interesting offseason around here, as the Flyers seem well prepared to make some noise, if that’s the direction they want to go. [DFO]

*How about a little trip back through history on the anniversary of the Flyers’ first Cup win. [BSB]

*We’ve also got a bit of housekeeping to cover! First, we have the schedule for the Conference Finals. [Sportsnet]

*And also the order is mostly set through the first two rounds of the draft. [Sportsnet]

*The Leafs were once again bounced from the playoffs early and in heartbreaking fashion, and like… what now? [The Athletic]

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/tuesday-morning-fly-by-restless-already/
 
Mark Recchi reportedly not an option for Flyers assistant coach under Rick Tocchet

The Philadelphia Flyers will have a new group of coaches behind the bench for the 2025-26 season.

We already know that Rick Tocchet will be the head honcho after his introduction last week, but his assistants have yet to be named. We also know that former assistant and interim head coach Brad Shaw “really wanted” the full-time gig and will not be returning to the Flyers.

There have been some names floating around with regards to who could be one of the Flyers new assistant coaches under Tocchet. Most of these names already have some tie to the Flyers, like Tocchet’s former teammates Luke Richardson and Mark Recchi.

While Richardson remains a strong option, it appears that Recchi has opted out of a potential assistant coach role.

One name to scratch off the #Flyers assistant coach list is Mark Recchi. An ambassador for the club, he's happy doing that role and doesn't really have an itch to get back into coaching right now.

— Jackie Spiegel (@jackiespiegel93) May 20, 2025

Recchi was initially traded to Philadelphia with Rick Tocchet and Kjell Samuelsson going the other way to Pittsburgh. He ultimately played 10 seasons with the Flyers, including with Tocchet at the beginning of his second stint with the club.

The former Flyers and Penguins player did join Pittsburgh as an assistant coach just over a decade ago and won back-to-back Stanley Cups in that role. He was most recently with the Columbus Blue Jackets and New Jersey Devils, so it wasn’t hard to envision him making the trip around the Metropolitan Division only to end up back in Philadelphia.

He is ultimately back in Philadelphia as a member of the Flyers Hall of Fame and as an ambassador for the Club, as Spiegel noted. But for now, he won’t be a part of his former teammate’s coaching staff.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...or-flyers-assistant-coach-under-rick-tocchet/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 23: Ivan Ryabkin is one of the riskiest bets of the draft

Slotting in at No. 23, Ivan Ryabkin is one of the most divisive players in this entire draft class, as a skilled Russian center that’s experienced quite the fall in his draft projection from the start of this cycle to now.

In most draft years, there is one or two guys that either experience dramatic rises or dramatic falls during the course of the draft year, and Ryabkin is unfortunately on the negative side of that. The case of Ryabkin harkens back to last year’s big drop of the draft, where former top-2024 Draft defenseman Aron Kiviharju fell all the way down to the Minnesota Wild at No. 122. It’s never truly a bad idea to take a reasonable swing on a player that was previously so highly rated because of their high-end skill, but it’s vital to understand the very real reasons why a player like this drops. High-end talent talks, but concerns about a player’s game to the level of Ryabkin can crater almost any level of talent to the mid-rounds. So, let’s get into the complicated case of Ivan Ryabkin.

Pre-draft rankings

No. 27 by The Athletic (Scott Wheeler)
No. 46 by Elite Prospects
No. 19 by TSN (Bob McKenzie)
No. 23 by Daily Faceoff

Bio


DOB: April 25, 2007
Birthplace: Balakovo, Russia
Position: Center
Height: 6’0″
Weight: 198 lbs
Shoots: Left

Statistics

What’s there to like?


Ryabkin has tons of tools in his skillset, and there’s no question why Ryabkin was an early favorite in this draft class to be at minimum a lottery selection. With some sort of regularity, Ryabkin would pull off plays like the one below in the MHL, the Russian league one step under the KHL. With plays like this, and scoring numbers that outpaced Matvei Michkov and paced right with Ivan Demidov at the same age in the MHL, Ryabkin was formerly heralded as top class in this year’s draft. 58 points in 44 MHL games is a pretty gaudy number for his age group, despite the league’s defense standards being some of the weakest you’ll see in all of professional hockey.

Ryabkin can certainly dangle with the puck, but he is particularly seen as a player that creates offense for his team through his combination of physicality and skill. In the MHL, he was quite the bruising player for a developing young prospect, and gained a reputation as a player that consistently throws hits in all three zones. When Ryabkin moved to the Muskegon Lumberjacks of the USHL in December, Ryabkin was tasked with learning how to throw more effective hits – and by all accounts, Ryabkin improved greatly in this aspect. As noted in Mitchell Brown’s report on Ryabkin, he’s now “throwing hits to win possession, retrieving loose pucks, and breaking up the occasional play defensively.” That’s a marked change for Ryabkin from the MHL to the USHL, and will become an important hallmark of Ryabkin’s game if he hits as a playmaking, kind-of power forward type in the NHL.

When the game slows down for Ryabkin, he can really execute at a high level. His struggle to play with pace in all situations is certainly a concern for the professional leagues, but when Ryabkin is given time and space with the puck, the skills take over. Particularly on the power play, where Ryabkin often served as Muskegon’s main distributor along the half-wall, his ability to find players in tight windows is impressive. He’s pretty deceptive with the puck on his stick, and has shown a propensity for completing cross-ice feeds, and knowing when to force the puck through soft areas versus making a safe play. Even if Ryabkin can never really pick up the pace in the NHL, there are plenty of players who make their money as power play savants. That’s not a complete player of course, but there is always a spot on an NHL roster for at least one of those type of players, and Ryabkin might just be that if his all-situations play doesn’t develop.

What’s not to like?

Ryabkin is one of the most frustrating watches in this entire draft class, because you can see the talent oozing off of him, but also see some of the biggest red flags of players with high-end skillsets in this class. Ryabkin’s issues can be sorted in a few different categories – compete, hockey IQ, and coachability concerns.

First, Ryabkin’s compete is the issue that is seemingly drawing teams away from him the most. There are so many shifts with Ryabkin where he’s simply unnoticeable, particularly in his work off the puck. That’s a real issue, especially when you consider the leagues that Ryabkin has played in. He’s been in two notably weak leagues on defense – the Russian MHL and the USHL – and Ryabkin has shown little signs of defensive involvement or improvement. In the offensive zone, he may be quite the flashy player at times with the puck, but he’s not really the driver of offense that often. It’s not the same kind of elite “passenger” style that top center prospect Anton Frondell plays, though. Frondell’s elite skill is his shot, and that can be really effective in a non play-driving player archetype.

The case with Ryabkin – a player who’s best skill is his playmaking and passing ability – is that Ryabkin needs the puck on his stick more to make things happen. On most shifts, since Ryabkin’s not out-competing and outsmarting teams, he’s rarely in that position to make plays, thus making it difficult for Ryabkin. That lack of compete and overall hockey sense is something that will likely be further exposed in better leagues, and will really push teams away from the prospect this June.

There’s also the rumors that Ryabkin has been a handful to coach over the years, and while we certainly can’t put too much stock in it, it’s something to monitor. There were similar rumors about Matvei Michkov a few years ago, and those turned out to largely be exaggerated. Maybe it’s the same with Ryabkin, and the characterization as ‘hard to teach’ is shown to be unfair a couple years down the road. But, with noted concerns about Ryabkin’s actual fitness level alongside these rumors, it’s not looking great for Ryabkin in this regard.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?


It’s hard to know what the Flyers are going to do with their seven picks in the first two rounds, but it would be pretty shocking to see the Flyers draft Ryabkin with one of them. It would be so unlike the Flyers in the Brent Flahr era to draft a player that’s biggest problems are concern about compete, coachability, and hockey IQ, and one who gets by solely due to high-end skill.

Thinking even back to last draft, the Flyers just don’t draft players with Ryabkin’s issues in the first couple of rounds. Jett Luchanko – high compete, two-way center that has elite traits in playmaking and skating. Jack Berglund – safe, two-way center that has a pretty solid floor as a bottom-sixer. Even 2024 fourth rounder Heikki Ruohonen was lauded for his compete level. There’s plenty of more examples in previous Brent Flahr drafts as well, and this is just in front office philosophy. With the big club, the problems with Ryabkin aren’t exactly loved in a John Tortorella system, and likely in a Rich Tocchet system. So, don’t be surprised to see the Flyers pass on Ryabkin multiple times in the draft, unless the Flyers really want to take a swing and go against previous team draft strategies.

Could the Flyers actually get him?

Certainly. Ryabkin is kinda impossible to project, as there’s chatter that he goes as high as the 20s, or as low as the third round. That’s all over the place for Ryabkin, and the Flyers have tons of picks in the 30s and 40s that they could utilize on the player if they so choose. Again, for the reasons stated above, it would be pretty shocking for a team like the Flyers to take the swing on Ryabkin, but it cannot be ruled out. The Flyers could certainly decide that Ryabkin is worth the risk, as there’s plenty of other Flyers picks in the first and second round for the team to take safer bets.

What scouts are saying

“Ryabkin is one of the most mercurial prospects in this draft and one of its toughest to slot. There are a lot of teams that will just steer clear, and I’d bet he’s a Day 2 pick now. Ryabkin entered his draft year with some excitement after a historic season in the MHL a year ago, had a three-assist, 22-minute first game of the year in the MHL this year and then was quickly promoted to the KHL. But that excitement cooled just as quickly when he couldn’t find the back of the net, his discipline on the puck (and in the penalty box) wavered and he was eventually a healthy scratch at the MHL level, which led to a move to Muskegon in the USHL only to get suspended for slew footing before he’d barely got started. Even before this year, there was talk of him being difficult to coach and work with coming out of Russia, too. And yet, he broke Matvei Michkov’s U17 scoring record in the MHL last year and put up comparable numbers to Ivan Demidov in his draft-minus-two season while being four and a half months younger than Demidov was. He has also been productive for Muskegon, finding the back of the net more and rebuilding his confidence while continuing to come and go in games and in discipline. I don’t know where I’d feel comfortable taking him but I’ve slotted him here on talent. I’d treat drafting him differently than I would other kids and would want to do my due diligence in interviews before I made a decision. He also needs to decide where he wants to play next year.

Ryabkin’s got a quick release. I like his instincts off the puck offensively to get open and jump into gaps in coverage. He’s got soft hands and makes a lot of plays off his backhand. He sees the ice well when there are plays to be made and has the finesse and touch to execute difficult passes. I like him in give-and-go plays and one-on-one inside the offensive zone. On the puck, he’s got a legit individual skill level. He’s got some real craft and creativity to his game. But his decision-making on the ice can leave a lot to be desired and he’s got some work to do to get into better shape (he’s actually a solid skater, which is why he could stand to benefit from working on his fitness). He showed last year a willingness to pursue and track pucks and looked like a player who could potentially stick at center up levels (though some are now questioning that). His work rate wavers, though, and there were some rumblings about him not being the easiest kid to play with/coach even before this season. I also find he can get ahead of the play at times (he can engage and finish his checks but needs to play the right way more consistently if he wants to be trusted enough to go out there and make his skill plays). It’s hard to find centers with his skill and offensive instincts/intuition in the second round, though, for example, and he remains a talent. But he’s now going to have to continue to prove himself.”

Scott Wheeler, The Athletic

“Entering the season, Ryabkin was consistently ranked in the top 5-10 on many preseason draft lists. He set records in Russia’s junior league, the MHL, and produced better than Matvei Michkov and Ivan Demidov at the same age. Since then, Ryabkin has played in three different Russian leagues with minimal success (and playing time) before signing with Muskegon of the USHL. He’s produced three goals in four games, but has already been suspended three games after a dirty slew foot incident. Last season, when he was at his best, Ryabkin looked like a very physical, point producing C prospect. That’s his ultimate upside, but the likelihood of him reaching that has plummeted the last four months.”

Jordan Harris (January 2025), Dobber Prospects

“Ryabkin is a wild card to keep an eye on in the first round. It’s a realistic thought that a team will be more aggressive and call his name before this slot. My concerns regarding Ryabkin’s ability to create offence, and score goals, is minimal. What I’m more concerned about is his fitness – which is a choice – and the overall pace he plays the game. When the game is more predictable, and in control for his team, Ryabkin’s skill definitely shines on the power play. It’s undeniable that he’s coming into his own at the USHL level, however, and his stats don’t lie. Ryabkin has 7G-4A in his most recent 10-game segment.”

Jason Bukala, Sportsnet

“Game No. 1 of the playoffs and Ryabkin had a solid showing. The biggest change over his time in the USHL has been increased pace and engagement off-puck. Now, he’s throwing hits to win possession, retrieving loose pucks, and breaking up the occasional play defensively. One big hit started a passing play and a rebound, which he promptly fired back on net. Though he’s not much of a puck carrier here, he makes quick passes off the wall, shoots a lot, and supports plays effectively now. He did have a couple of poor decisions here, as well as many missed passes in transition and offensively. The playmaking still hasn’t fully clicked at this level with most of his slot passes either to no one in particular or put his teammate in a bad spot. But, he’s making quicker decisions in transition and making the occasional play off the wall. The potential for a mid-six power forward remains, but he’s much more of a project than many anticipated. Skating, pace, and details all have to improve significantly. There are special elements, but he’s more of a mid-to-late second-rounder for me.”

Mitchell Brown, Elite Prospects April 14th Game Report



The next player to enter the poll is William Moore, a sturdy two-way center from the USNTDP.

“Moore was a tough evaluation this season. He was arguably the most talented player on this year’s U.S. NTDP. He has a lot of tools that will appeal to NHL teams as a big forward whose played some center, skates well, has good puck skills and can make creative plays with the puck. I wouldn’t describe him as a top-tier playmaker, but he sees the ice well enough. Moore’s compete has come into question at times this season and he’s certainly inconsistent but he has the ability to be effective down low, and can kill penalties. There’s nothing that truly stands out about his game, but the sum of the parts could lead to him being a useful middle six wing.”

Corey Pronman, The Athletic

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...-draft-flyers-stats-scouting-report-analysis/
 
Ian Laperriere not returning as Phantoms coach

Ian Laperriere won’t be returning as the head coach of the Flyers’ American Hockey League affiliate in Lehigh Valley. There’s no word as to who will be the new coach, just that Laperriere’s days behind the Phantoms’ bench have come to an end. The Phantoms, who signed Laperriere to a two-year extension last season, have yet to make the news official.

Ian Laperriere will not be returning as Lehigh Valley Phantoms head coach.

— Bill Meltzer (@billmeltzer) May 21, 2025

According to a thread from the above tweet, the parting was mutual and the belief is Laperriere is interested in seeking a coaching position in the NHL. Obviously with Rick Tocchet signing a five-year deal last week, that head coaching dream in Philadelphia is history for Laperriere. Whether Laperriere is seeking either a head coaching spot or an assistant coach position isn’t clear.

Laperriere coached Lehigh Valley for four seasons. The Phantoms were above .500 in three of those four seasons, missing the playoffs in 2021-22. This past season Lehigh Valley beat Wilkes-Barre/Scranton in a best-of-three playoff “play-in” round before losing in five games to the two-time defending Calder Cup champions Hershey Bears. There’s no word as to who might be a possible replacement for Laperriere or when the search will begin.

As a player Laperriere spent most of his 16-year career with the Kings and Avalanche before playing his final season in Philadelphia.

With a few head coaching openings still available in the NHL, Laperriere could be throwing his hat into the ring for such a position. However, with established coaches (and relative newcomers) such as Gerard Gallant and Jay Woodcroft ready, willing, and able to land work somewhere, it’s a long shot Laperriere could simply land one of only 32 coveted spots. It’s more likely a team would look at him as an assistant coach behind their bench.

The mutual parting should also help Philadelphia in terms of development. A new coach with a different vision could result in prospects like Alex Bump, Oliver Bonk and Denver Barkey possibly blossoming in the minors with a new voice in Lehigh Valley.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/post/ian-laperriere-not-returning-as-phantoms-coach/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 24: Blake Fiddler is a steady, projectable defenseman

The next player on our BSH draft board is Blake Fiddler, a steady right-handed defenseman developed with both the US National Team Development Program and with the WHL’s Edmonton Oil Kings.

Projected to go in the back half of the first round, Fiddler fits into the group of defenseman in the third defenseman tier of the draft. With Matthew Schaefer being the top tier, Radim Mrtka and Kashawn Aitcheson making up the second tier, the third group is a bit more convoluted. It’s probably some combination of Logan Hensler, Sascha Boumedienne, Cameron Reid, and Blake Fiddler that make up the final tier of likely first-round defensemen. Fiddler, among that group, really stands out a mobile, steady right-handed defenseman with size. Fiddler doesn’t play a ‘safe’ game, but out of any of those players, you might feel the most confident that Fiddler has at minimum a NHL floor with plausible second pair upside. So, let’s get into what makes Fiddler a worthwhile player to bet on with a late first round pick.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 29 by The Athletic (Scott Wheeler)
No. 22 by Elite Prospects
No. 21 by TSN (Bob McKenzie)
No. 21 by Daily Faceoff

Bio


DOB: July 9, 2007
Birthplace: Nashville, TN
Position: Defenseman
Height: 6’4”
Weight: 209 lbs
Shoots: Right

Statistics

What’s there to like?


When Fiddler is operating at his best, he’s an extremely calming presence on the blueline, and can really dictate with the puck on his stick. It’s what’s made him a top pairing player for the Edmonton Oil Kings and the USNTDP, even if Fiddler has bouts where he’s mistake prone.

There are two things that Fiddler is especially strong at – picking his spots to engage offensively, and using his stick and long reach to anticipate and disrupt the opposition. Offensively, the raw skills aren’t going to wow you with Fiddler, but he’s got all the makings of an effective two-way defenseman that puts up 30-40 points a year in the NHL. He’s selective in when he activates on the rush, frequently noticing when the opposition could be caught with an extra man behind the play. When he’s in the offensive zone, he’s steady as a puck carrier, and particularly effective in getting a low, hard wrist-shot through traffic from the point. That’s why he’s been on the power play for both the USNTDP and the Oil Kings, and why he probably has a spot on a NHL team’s power play unit if he hits (likely PP2).

The rush below is a perfect example of the smart offensive instincts that Fiddler possesses. Noticing that one too many forwards for the opposition was caught in the Edmonton zone, Fiddler jumps through the neutral zone, and is in position for the trailing pass. He then beats the goalie clean with a wrister, something that he’s also been able to do quite often for a defenseman thus far in his career.

Blake Fiddler puts it up high where mom hides the cookies 🍪@EdmOilKings | #NHLDraft pic.twitter.com/O9AkB8nEnS

— Western Hockey League (@TheWHL) March 23, 2025

One more note on his movement through the neutral zone – Fiddler probably moves with the most confidence through this area of the ice. While he can get into some trouble on executing quick exits from the defensive zone (more on this later), Fiddler really skates with confidence through the neutral zone. A good example is in the next clip, where Fiddler stickhandles neatly out of pressure and calmly moves the puck forward. Again, all signs point to the transition game being very strong for Fiddler, especially if he cleans up his initial zone exits.

To his actual in-zone defense, the interesting part about Fiddler is he doesn’t play ‘big’ by the typical expectations of a 6’4” defenseman. Fiddler hasn’t quite learned how to consistently use his body to impose his will on the opposition yet, but what he is quite good at already is leveraging his reach to break a play. No matter how a player comes at Fiddler, 9 times out of 10 he stops the play with his stick, and that’s ultimately going to be very effective in rush/open-ice situations that he deals with moving forward. In the final clip, Fiddler ends a promising rush by likely first-rounder Cameron Schmidt in this fashion.

And finally, another thing to like is Fiddler’s age at the time of the draft. Fiddler will turn 18 in July, and is one of the younger defenseman prospects in this draft class. There could be more runway for Fiddler to grow into his frame, to add a tick or two of raw skill, etc. The thought that there’s more room to grow could inflate his value a tiny bit heading into the draft.

What’s not to like?


As steady as Fiddler is, the best version of Fiddler is probably one where you are not noticing him a lot over the course of a game. Fiddler’s been known to have some suspect decision making, particularly on zone exits. He’s calm, cool, and collected when he’s at his best, but at his worst? His decisions with the puck can be panicked, and this shows the most in the defensive zone. When he’s pressured with the puck, Fiddler has been criticized for unclean exits, for turnovers where he forces the puck in a low probability play, and even for stickhandling his own way into trouble. Will all of these issues, it seems that these things are coachable, unless Fiddler’s hockey IQ is less than the rest of his game makes it appear.

As pointed out earlier, Fiddler also needs to improve upon using his frame to its maximum potential. We’re not saying Fiddler should remodel his game to become overly physical as a 6’4” right-handed defenseman – but if he can combine his plus poke-checking skills with crushing physicality? Fiddler’s defensive ceiling skyrockets, and he becomes a player archetype that NHL teams salivate over. It’ll be interesting to see if he can reach that level.

How would he fit in the Flyers’ system?


If he hits as a player, Fiddler might just be a larger Cam York? Not oodles of offensive upside, pretty stout in his defensive work, and a very respectable transition game. So, he’d fit in pretty well in Philadelphia as an efficient, puck-moving defenseman that hopefully builds in more physicality and offense into his game. There might be a little redundancy in the pipeline with Oliver Bonk and the Flyers abundance of second-pair types at the NHL level, but you can never have too many good players. The Flyers obviously need “the guy” on the blueline, and Fiddler is (with 99% likelihood) not that, but you can never stop adding good players to the pipeline.

Could the Flyers actually get him?


Yes. Fiddler is squarely in the range of the Flyers two late first-rounders, depending on the order that the Fiddler-tier of defenseman are picked in. Honestly, a pick for Fiddler is something that could really make sense for the Flyers, especially with what we know of Brent Flahr’s drafting. Just a few years ago, the Flyers maddened tons of people by going with a safer pick in Oliver Bonk, a large, two-way defenseman with solid puck skills and instincts. That’s a pretty similar outlook for Fiddler, who certainly wouldn’t be a sexy pick but a really solid bet on NHL floor and projectability. If the Flyers make a sizable swing at No. 6, similar to what they did with Matvei Michkov in that 2023 draft, look for a player like Fiddler to be taken with one of the late firsts. They are inevitably not going to go all risk with their high picks, and Fiddler’s one of the better bets as a safer pick.

What scouts are saying


“Fiddler is a big, strong, right-shot defenceman who is deployed in all situations for the Oil Kings in the WHL. He’s the son of former NHL forward Vern Fiddler. Blake captained Team USA at the Hlinka Gretzky tournament in August and leads by example with his club team. For his stature, Fiddler moves very well off the puck and has the ability to join the rush as an extra layer. Defensively he does whatever it takes to keep pucks out of his net. He gets in shooting lanes to block shots and he’s efficient with his outlets. Fiddler has potential middle pairing upside as a two-way/match-up defenceman.”
Jason Bukala, Sportsnet

“Fiddler is a defenseman with a lot of NHL traits. To start, at 6-foot-4, he’s much bigger than his father, Vernon. He also skates quite well for his size. Fiddler closes on his checks quite well and gets up the ice efficiently. He competes well on the ice. I wouldn’t call him overly physical, but he works hard to win pucks and make defensive plays. He shows flashes of excellent offensive skill, and on the rush, he’s quite dangerous due to his great wingspan and skill. His vision is just OK. He doesn’t see the ice well and makes too many poor decisions for my liking. I don’t see a true NHL power-play type, but he has enough puck play in his game to go with his great athleticism to be a legit pro prospect.”
Corey Pronman, The Athletic

“Fiddler got a lot of attention early thanks his size, his smooth skating, and his solid play at the Hlinka tournament over the summer. While still likely a first rounder, Fiddler’s inconsistent play in the WHL has cost him some fans. He uses his reach and skating to close gaps on the rush and demonstrate some physicality, though it is his play with the puck that is less assuring. Fiddler makes some questionable decisions offensively and causes some frustrating turnovers through poor handling. Nevertheless, there is still room for Fiddler to iron out these details and progress into a solid NHLer.”
Luke Sweeney, Dobber Prospects



With one defenseman coming off the list, we’ll add another late-first round blueliner to our poll – Boston University defenseman Sascha Boumedienne.

“His skating is great — quick, agile, and exceptionally smooth in backward motion. On the breakout, he uses his feet well to snap up retrievals and create separation from the first forechecker, allowing him to make a solid first pass to start the breakout. Defensively, his rush defense is already quite effective, largely due to his strong footwork and long reach. He positions himself well to disrupt plays and doesn’t often get caught out of position. While there’s a lot to like about his skating and transitional game, I don’t see huge upside in terms of his overall skill set. He’s not particularly dynamic or technically gifted beyond his skating and first pass.”

Greysen Goudy, FC Hockey

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...e-fiddler-is-a-steady-projectable-defenseman/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 25: Cameron Schmidt, the ultimate boom-or-bust

There might be no one who has a wider spectrum of potential career paths in the entire class of the 2025 NHL Draft, than Cameron Schmidt. When it comes to the Vancouver Giants winger, he will either fulfil his potential and become some sort of very solid goal scorer at the NHL level, or just never make it there and potentially play very limited professional hockey overall.

Why, though? Well, unfortunately, Schmidt is 5-foot-7. While height is often overrated as an attribute to judge a player on, there is a limit to that and around Schmidt’s height it becomes a legitimate limiting factor. Since the 2010-11 season, there have been only 10 total players who have been listed at 5-foot-7 or below to play in an NHL game. Those are: Trey Fix-Waolansky, Andy Miele, Stephen Gionta, Chris Conner, David Deshairnais, Brett Stirling, Brian Gionta, Rocco Grimaldi, Joe Whitney, and Nathan Gerbe.

There certainly are some names we like and appreciate for what they did, but again, it’s just an overall attribute that you would prefer to be on the right side of. They are fighting an uphill battle from the start and NHL teams often don’t want to really commit to those players playing on future teams. Alex Debrincat dropped to the second round, Cole Caufield went later than expected despite dominating college hockey — and both of those players are taller than Schmidt.

But, let’s not discourage the player. If everything breaks right, Schmidt would be joining that group of Debrincat and Caufield as top-end wingers who could score a billion goals in all situations in the NHL.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 43 by NHL Central Scouting (NA Skaters)
No. 16 by Elite Prospects
No. 30 by TSN (Bob McKenzie)
No. 36 by The Athletic (Scott Wheeler)

Bio​


DOB: January 19, 2007
Birthplace: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Position: Right wing
Height: 5’7″
Weight: 157 lbs
Shoots: Right

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


A whole damn lot. Schmidt is as electric a player in junior hockey can be. He is responsible for just about half of his team’s entire offensive production and has all the tools to back it up. A very solid skater that can burst up the ice with decent acceleration, is not afraid to be in on the forecheck and apply pressure despite his size, and possibly has the best shot in the entire draft class.

All of that skill led him to leading his own team in both goals and total points, and scoring the seventh-most goals in the entire WHL among all age groups. Even just looking at the players in the last 10 WHL seasons who have scored 40 or more goals in their draft years and you see the level of play that Schmidt was able to achieve this past season. Connor Bedard (obviously), Berkly Catton, Tij Iginla, Terik Parascak, Kailer Yamamoto, Seth Jarvis, Koehn Ziemmer, Carter Bear, and then Schmidt. That’s the entire list.

Outside of Ziemmer, whose production has actually declined, and Yamamoto, who is struggling to find a consistent spot in the NHL, these are some of the best prospects teams have or had in recent years. And Schmidt is right up there with them. He’s just electric.

Give Schmidt some space in the offensive zone, and he can pull something off.

While the peaks of his game are among the very best in this draft class, there still are some question marks that need to be answered. Schmidt falls into the same archetype category as the other diminutive scorers before him in previous drafts and now it is just about whether he can overcome the barriers to become the NHL player that he has the skill to be, or just fall down as a player with all the skill in the world but is more destined for a slower pace league. It’s a swing.

What’s not to like?​


There are some areas of Schmidt’s overall profile that can be easily nitpicked. Enough has been said about his height, so let’s not repeat the whole thing once more in this section. But, scouts have noticed an ongoing trend about Schmidt that can be somewhat concerning when it comes to his projectability. His decision making when taking shots has not been the best. Because he has been such a volume shooter with the Giants, these decisions have been swept away but as Elite Prospects’ Cam Robinson points out in a scouting report from Schmidt’s March 15 game against the Victoria Royals, it’s a little frustrating to see all the offensive talent, but then some of his chances go to waste.

“Early in the 2nd period, while working the point on the PP, he took the cross line dish, walked downhill and sent a nice backhand cross onto the tape of the darting mate who received and finished it off. Later in that period, he pulled a puck off the wall and slung a backhand cross to the point where it was swung on net. Schmidt, heading toward the crease, battled it baseball style out of mid air from the hashmarks. Great hand eye and focus,” Robinson wrote. “Had a clear-cut break from his own blueline–exploded into the opening and was stopped on the five-hole attempt. I still feel that he overshoots and misses better options. At least three shot attempts were easily blocked in this one as he telegraphed his intention and had the defender block the lane, and he fired anyway. This is doubly frustrating because when he chooses to, his vision and playmaking are really impressive.”

All of that praising of scoring plays he made, but then just decided to go for his own shot while missing some opportunities he had to lay it off to his teammates. That can be ironed out, though. These types of miscues can be chalked up to just a junior player knowing that he is the primary source of his team’s offense and he is solely responsible to drive most of it if they want to have a chance to win.

How would he fit into the Flyers’ system?​


Well, he would find a lot of similar company. It’s sort of an ongoing problem that the Flyers find themselves with a bevy of wingers who aren’t the most physically dominant. But, that’s when you look at the current outlook of the team. Seeing Bobby Brink here, Denver Barkey on his way, and then even somewhat shorter forwards like Noah Cates, might give you a reason to be concerned about adding Schmidt to the mix.

But, who even knows if Brink will still be on this team when Schmidt is 22 or 23 years old. Even Barkey is a whole two years ahead of Schmidt and if there’s a two-year gap of smaller, but ultra talented wingers coming down the pipeline until the end of time, it’s a surefire way to find some underappreciated talent in the draft and take advantage of it.

With the most recent top selections, the Flyers have been going for more stable workhorses that will certainly fill roles on competitive teams, and not so much of betting on the talent to override any other unfortunate attributes. Schmidt would easily be the Flyers prospect with the highest offensive upside right now. And if they add more prospects with higher ceilings in the earlier picks this June, that’s even better.

Could the Flyers actually get him?​


Almost certainly. Schmidt might be a little too risky in the first round for NHL teams despite his skill probably deserving a top 30 selection, so we could see him easily dropping into the second round and it wouldn’t even be a Debrincat-esque surprise. With the Flyers having four of the first 16 selections in the second round, taking a big swing on Schmidt is an easy thing to do. Maybe more than any other team (if the Flyers still have all four second-rounders) we can pencil in Schmidt as one of the selections. It’s the big, massive swing that most fans have been asking for from this team.

What scouts are saying​


“One week, I feel like Cameron Schmidt is a top 15 guy in this class, and the next week I feel like he’s barely a first round pick. Some games I’ve seen he’s electrifying and all over the ice, some others he’s getting absolutely run over by the opponent and is unable to gain any kind of advantage. He’s on the list of most exciting players available in the entire class though, and you can clearly tell that this is a feisty, competitive player, but the odds are stacked against him a little bit. He’s very, very small, taking up very little space on the ice and is very much defensively absent and ineffective in transition. He’s a fantastic puck carrier though with evasive skill and quick footwork to push players back, which is something he’ll absolutely need to do at higher levels. The weird part of my dataset on Schmidt is that his playmaking attempts outpace his dangerous shot attempts. Most often he’s shooting the puck from the perimeter, but that trend has improved since October. Part of me wonders what better surroundings would do for Schmidt as many of his playmaking attempts go unfinished, and he still is responsible for half of Vancouver’s offense with him on the ice. He’s a pure machine gun offensive player who is going to need good surroundings in order to get to his ceiling, and he’ll need patience and encouragement to get there as well, but if he does, he could be an electrifying offensive zone threat. Are we looking at the next Daniel Sprong? Perhaps, but I’m on the record as a Sprong Stan and in the right scenario, you can get some very good overall output from a player like that.”
–Will Scouch, scouching.ca

“Schmidt plays the game to attack, challenge and score, with an ability to threaten inside the offensive zone and off the rush, both pouncing and being opportunistic around the slot but also knifing past defenders on cuts or attacking into his heavy curl-and-drag wrister (he really settles it into his pocket and then uncorks it). He’s a worker who will get after it, jump on loose pucks, win races and then manufacture offense out of it in quick bursts”
–Scott Wheeler, The Athletic

“His blazing speed makes him ultra-dangerous on the rush for obvious reasons, but he also explodes laterally, which opens up space for himself in the offensive zone. For a smaller player, the power Schmidt has behind his wrist shot is impressive, and the quickness of his release is equally noteworthy. After multiple viewings of Schmidt, it’s clear that he’s most accurate when shooting high on goalies, with the ability to beat them without a screen consistently. Something encouraging about his game is the fearlessness he shows in the dirty areas of the ice, especially with the puck.”
–Kareem Elshafey, FC Hockey



Another interesting prospect has come and gone from our draft board, so now we need to add another one to the poll. Everyone, please welcome Kitchener Rangers blueliner Cameron Reid to the mix.

“”Reid is compact in stature, but plenty strong in the trenches. He doesn’t shy away from physical contact, but his most elite element is his skating ability. Reid has the agility and explosiveness to close on opponents defensively and spin off checks to launch the attack offensively.”
–Jason Bukala, Sportsnet

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...-no-25-cameron-schmidt-ultimate-boom-or-bust/
 
Maple Leafs reportedly offered haul for Flyers’ Ristolainen at trade deadline, were rejected

The Philadelphia Flyers were very active around last season’s trade deadline. They traded long-time veteran Scott Laughton, parted ways with Joel Farabee and Morgan Frost months before the deadline, flipped Andrei Kuzmenko to get maximum value, and then did Erik Johnson a favor and sent him back home to Colorado.

According to one recent report, though, they could have done even more and traded defenseman Rasmus Ristolainen to the Maple Leafs for what seems like a haul.

In a recent article from the Ottawa Sun’s Bruce Garrioch, he mentions somewhat passively that, according to a league source, the Leafs were in hot pursuit of the 30-year-old blueliner and offered a sizeable amount of assets in a trade for his services.

League executives also suggested the Senators could try to see if they can find a fit with the Philadelphia Flyers for right-shot blueliner Rasmus Ristolainen, who has two years left at $5.1 million per season.

But it should be noted that the Toronto Maple Leafs tried desperately to get Ristolainen at the trade deadline in March, and were rebuffed.

“The Leafs offered the moon and couldn’t get him out of there,” a league source said.

Bruce Garrioch, Ottawa Sun

Of course, we have no idea what that trade could have looked like. What exactly is “the moon” when it comes to a trade with Toronto, anyways? But, considering that they did end up giving up a first-round pick and center prospect Fraser Minten for someone similar to Ristolainen in Brandon Carlo from the Boston Bruins, could we have possibly seen the same thing go down?

Let’s continue to pull on this thread. The Leafs needed the Bruins to retain salary on Carlo to make it work, turning his $4.1-million AAV cap hit into $3.485 million to squeeze their dollars right under the ceiling. For the Leafs to make Ristolainen work, if it was on deadline day, the Flyers would have had to theoretically retained a whopping $1.615 million on Ristolainen’s contract. It’s not the largest number, but it’s not insignificant.

Considering that Ristolainen’s contract is through the 2026-27 season, that is a long time to have that amount of money on the books. And if it was for a center prospect who might top out as a middle-six guy but is more likely to be a bottom-six penalty-killing center, and a pick that is probably going to be in the high-20s? Is it worth it? When we also take into consideration how the Flyers value cap flexibility above a whole lot — they traded Joel Farabee for almost nothing to get some — and that they have repeated ad nauseum that they want to be big players in the 2026 free agent class, that $1.615 million could be a sore spot and could be a barrier to acquiring a player that would make this Flyers team a perennial contender, hypothetically.

Again, no one knows what this offer was but we can at least make educated guesses. Everyone’s opinion of what a massive trade package is for Ristolainen can vary from just one single first-round pick, to a whole heaping pile of prospects and picks.

We do know that the Flyers were reportedly asking for at least a first-round pick for Ristolainen at this past trade deadline, but that did not include the need to retain any salary and that of course complicates things.

Garrioch also touches on the Ottawa Senators possibly being a fit for Ristolainen as early as this calendar year. The large Finnish blueliner is dealing with an injury that is keeping him out of action for all of training camp this fall and possibly affecting the start to his regular season. So, this theoretical trade to Ottawa for Ristolainen would not be able to come to fruition closer to the end of 2025 — considering that he would need to show that he is capable of playing hockey again after he recovers from his injury.

Towards the end of May is not typically when we hear that the trade market is ramping up, but it is interesting to reflect on something that could have possibly happened. Again, just one single source talking to a reporter based in Ottawa about the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Philadelphia Flyers, but it would be certainly interesting.

There could be interest in Ristolainen and the market for him most likely will heat up once again closer to the 2026 trade deadline (we hope).

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...offered-haul-for-rasmus-ristolainen-deadline/
 
2025 BSH Community Draft Board, No. 26: Sascha Boumedienne is a mobile depth defense option

We’re approaching the home stretch of the first round of our draft board, and joining the mix today is defenseman Sascha Boumedienne, who brings a player profile which is interesting in more ways than one.

Born in Finland but representing the Swedish national team on the international stages (made possible by his father, former NHLer Josef Boumedienne’s Swedish citizenship), Sascha Boumedienne came up playing his minor hockey in the Blue Jackets’ junior program, before moving for one year to Youngstown of the USHL, and then finally landing in Boston, playing his freshman season with BU as a 17-year old. He faced a sharp learning curve, but ultimately grew into his role well, and put together a successful season for himself, in a long season ending in the National Championship game (which his Terriers did lose, we recall). All the same, Boumedienne has put in a lot of work to mature his game this season, and while there’s yet a lot of work to be done still, he’s made himself an interesting option for team’s looking to add some defensive depth late in the first round.

Pre-draft rankings​


No. 18 by NHL Central Scouting (NA Skaters)
No. 47 by Elite Prospects
No. 25 by TSN (Bob McKenzie)
No. 38 by The Athletic (Scott Wheeler)

Bio​


DOB: January 17, 2007
Birthplace: Oulu, Finland
Position: Defense
Height: 6’2″
Weight: 183 lbs
Shoots: Left

Statistics​

What’s there to like?​


In the big picture, Boumedienne fits well the model of the mobile, strong puck moving modern defenseman. He didn’t play a hugely flashy game for the Terriers this season, but it was one which was on the whole quite solid, and only got better as the season went on. He’s quick on loose pucks and equally quick to turn play up-ice in transition, and confident enough in his play to, if he’s not putting a breakout pass on a teammate’s tape, is doing well to skate the puck through the neutral zone on his own. His game on the whole is quite possession-focused, and he doesn’t give the puck away for free often.

His defensive game isn’t completely locked down, but he brings a good, quick stick and has been solid on the whole at breaking up plays with a bit of deft positioning and ability to gap up on puck carriers quickly. It might not make for the flashiest of performances, but he’s getting better and better at the college level of making the quick, subtle moves to kill a play before the big defensive effort is needed to negate it, which speaks well to the level at which he’s processing the game.

Some of the mechanics of his skating are a little wonky (more on that later) but he’s able to get up to a good speed in a straight line, and overall brings a good motor with his game, plays with good pace. And even with some of the weaknesses in his skating game, he remains one of the more mobile defenders in this class. It’s not exactly a hallmark of his game — though there is some potential for him to get closer to that mark — there’s a somewhat underrated slipperiness that he’s able to bring to the table, which aids him particularly in transition situations when he’s moving with the puck.

Boumedienne hasn’t shown up as a huge goal scoring threat — there is some potential there though, with a quick shot with some power behind it, that he can generally get through traffic well — but he’s been much more reliable as a distributor. He’s quick enough at the blue line to make a good volume to keeps at the line, and is able to use his quick, accurate passing to thread pucks through traffic to set his teammates up for chances.

Also, while he didn’t positively rake in the points for the Terriers this season — though the figure he did put up is certainly respectable — we can reasonably expect that he’ll be able to take a significant step forward in his sophomore season, if his coaching staff gives him some power play time to work with this time around (a role he did thrive in at the junior level). He’ll have some stiff competition to go up against, but there’s certainly some interesting untapped potential here. We certainly saw it at work in a big way at this year’s U18s, as he scored 14 points over seven games and set a new single-tournament record for points by a defenseman, so it’s clear that there’s some more offense in his game than they were seeing at BU. It’ll be something interesting to watch going forward, no doubt.

That performance at the U18s puts him in something of an interesting position as well — though his projection is still somewhere in and around the end of the first round, beginning of the second round, we’ve seen teams fall victim to recency bias in drafts past, so might this give Boumedienne’s stock a boost in the eyes of some organizations? Time will tell.

What’s not to like?​


Of course, it’s not as though there aren’t any weak points in Boumedienne’s game. We mentioned his good straight line speed, but his edge work is a little clunky and that can give him some trouble navigating tight coverage in the defensive zone. It’s not a massive red flag, and he still manages to generally work around that, but it’s not pretty, and if he’s not able to make some improvements, it likely will hold him back to a degree at the next level. There’s some promise there — as he’s certainly made improvements from the start of the season, getting more bend in his knees and a bit more explosiveness in his first couple of strides — but it remains a work in progress, and will remain something of a question mark until further progress is made.

He’s also not exactly perfect in the decision making department, and can be somewhat prone to mistakes with the puck, or on reads in the defensive zone. He’s making some strides here too, but it’s another work in progress, and teams looking to potentially draft him are going to have to reckon with the fact that he’s going to be a bit more of a project as a prospect. If they have the resources to dedicate to developing his game in the right way, it’s not a problem, but for a team that might be looking for a more complete prospect, this might steer them away.

How would he fit into the Flyers’ system?​


The question of fit here is an interesting one. On the one hand, Boumedienne doesn’t address any direct or specific needs within the Flyers’ prospect pipeline. That is, they’re not exactly starving for left shooting defense prospects, particularly those who aren’t exactly lockdown stalwarts in the defensive zone. That said, this doesn’t mean that the game he brings to the mix is completely redundant. Having a surplus of defenders in the pipeline who can skate and move the puck well is valuable, and while Boumedienne doesn’t address the desire to stock up on more physical defensive presences, they’ve equally been working to bolster that area through last year’s draft, and it’s not as though they don’t have a surplus of picks to continue to chip away at that this year, if they feel strongly that they need to continue to pursue that balance. That said, the size that Boumedienne brings does offer a bit of balance to a defense group that’s been trending a little smaller on them, even if he doesn’t tick the box as the booming physical presence.

Additionally, they’re still looking for that right fit to run their top power play unit at the NHL level, and while they’re certainly a ways away from Boumedienne being ready to make the jump to that level, it definitely doesn’t feel like a bad idea to stock up on players who look like they could factor in as options for this role.

Could the Flyers actually get him?​


While it’s a wider range as far as where Boumedienne is projected to go in this draft, it feels like a pretty safe bet that he’ll at least be an option for the Flyers, be it at the end of the first round, or even early in the second when those picks begin roll around. Even with a potential eleventh hour boost that we mentioned as a possibility earlier, Boumedienne should remain in play for the Flyers to pick at some point, making his all but surely a name to watch.

What scouts are saying​


“This is another player who I’ve gone back and forth on every single time I’ve seen him. I was a little bit down on where others had Boumedienne to start the year, but in this class, he quickly becomes an intriguing project to build on that could be a good development case that matures into a solid possession-focused defenseman with great skating ability who really thrives in the offensive zone. His range allows him to gather pucks quickly and effectively, he’s got some interesting tricks to pull off in order to push into the neutral zone, and the skill level is pretty good for a defender in this class. That said, his defensive results and video evidence are a mixed bag. While on paper he isn’t getting filled in in the defensive zone, he struggles on the rush with his backwards skating and mobility, and there just isn’t much of a physical edge to his defending as of right now. Like Hensler, it is very difficult for me to project exactly what Boumedienne could be, but if I had to put money on it, I could see a mobile bottom four defender that I might experiment with on the power play who carries some issues tracking defensive rushes, but uses his footwork and speed to win races and defend through his positioning. Time will tell, and I’ll see him at least a couple more times before the end of the season, but he’s moved up quite a bit here and has become an interesting curiosity in this class.”
–Will Scouch, scouching.ca

“Boumedienne has good size and uses it to his advantage, with a long reach that helps him maintain solid gaps and take away passing lanes. Despite his size, however, he is not physical at all, making him easy to push off the puck and prone to shying away from contact. He also relies a bit too much on his reach, often lunging at loose pucks instead of beating the opposing player to them. Building strength will help boost his defensive game. Most of his offensive opportunities came in transition, as he didn’t really look to establish himself as a threat when his team had sustained zone time. With his vision, it would be beneficial to see Boumedienne put himself in better positions to produce and create chances.”
–Jacob Roth, FC Hockey



You know the drill: one player comes off the poll, another steps in to replace him. Today we’re welcoming into the mix Jack Murtagh, a speedy forward with the NTDP, committed to join Boumedienne at Boston University in the fall (how’s that for continuity?).

“Murtagh is a rollercoaster ride. On one hand, he had two amazing runs for shots in the offensive zone that were highlight reel level good. He has a great shot and is able to get it off against very good competition, and he was a productive transition player with the puck on his stick.

On the other hand, Murtagh doesn’t engage very much defensively and had the worst Corsi by far on the NTDP through the tracking data, and his passing decisions were very rushed and off target with him completing less than 50% of his total passes.

I like the skill and the offensive zone game, but there are a lot of details that need to be cleaned up between his defensive game and engagement, and his inability to process passing plays quick enough to maintain possession through his playmaking. “
-Austin Garrett, Smaht Scouting

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...depth-defense-scouting-report-stats-analysis/
 
Report: Flyers goaltender Aleksei Kolosov heading back to the KHL

Although the Flyers have made no announcement or confirmation, a report has surfaced stating that Aleksei Kolosov is heading back to the KHL to play with Minsk.

Looks like they will be welcoming him back next season.
Kolosov + Demchenko tandem in Minsk next season.
#LetsGoFlyers https://t.co/MQ7yiXkpFm

— Hockey News Hub (@HockeyNewsHub) May 24, 2025

Again, this is the first report that Kolosov could be heading back to the KHL, but it’s an interesting situation to monitor. The Flyers, who own his rights, would either loan Kolosov back to the Russian club or have to terminate the remaining year on Kolosov’s contract which is valued at $925,000. Once that happened then Kolosov would be returning to the club he played four seasons for, starting in 2020-21 and concluding in 2023-24.

Kolosov signed a three-year, entry-level deal with the Flyers in July, 2023. He arrived in North America near the end of the 2023-24 season and played two games with Lehigh Valley. However, various reports indicated he wasn’t happy there, mainly due to the language barrier and the cultural differences of daily life. Kolosov arrived later than expected to the 2024-25 Flyers training camp but was part of a three-goalie rotation most of the season. The result was often not getting playing time he needed to adapt to the North American game and sometimes going weeks (if not months) between playing. Kolosov played 17 games with the Flyers in 2024-25 and a mere 12 with Lehigh Valley. He was called back to the Flyers near the end of the regular season as then head coach John Tortorella lost all faith in Ivan Fedotov as a backup to Sam Ersson. Kolosov played in the Flyers’ season finale against Buffalo, a 5-4 loss in regulation.

If the Flyers and Kolosov agree to part ways, it certainly helps a bit the log jam the Flyers have when it comes to goaltending. The Flyers are possibly looking to upgrade the position by acquiring a veteran goalie to tandem with Ersson, most likely through free agency and on a relatively frugal, short-term contract. Now that Cal Petersen’s contract is up and it’s almost a given he won’t be re-signed, the loss of those two goalies could make it easier to find spots for all parties involved. If Ersson and a veteran become the Flyers’ 2025-26 tandem, then it should be easier to give Fedotov time in Lehigh Valley, essentially burying his contract (which has a year left at $3.275 million) as they did with Petersen this past season.

Of course there is still playing time needed to go around for Carson Bjarnason, Fedotov (again if the Flyers sign a veteran) and possibly 2023 third-round pick Yegor Zavragin who played in the KHL this past season. Eetu Makiniemi (who was injured for a good portion of last season in Lehigh Valley) is a pending group 6 unrestricted free agent and is unlikely to be re-signed. So that’s possibly three goaltenders in Petersen, Kolosov and Makiniemi who were in the Phantoms picture this past season that won’t be next year.

Kolosov saw no playoff action with the Lehigh Valley Phantoms despite being sent down at the end of the Flyers’ season. The Phantoms used both Petersen and Parker Gahagen in the playoffs against Wilkes-Barre/Scranton and Hershey, bowing out to the latter in five games in a best-of-five.

If this is the end of the Aleksei Kolosov experiment in Philadelphia, here’s hoping that Zavragin’s stint with Philadelphia is far smoother and productive than Kolosov’s nightmarish season.

Source

Source: https://www.broadstreethockey.com/p...nder-aleksei-kolosov-heading-back-to-the-khl/
 
Back
Top