News Wizards Team Notes

Wizards 2025-26 Meet the Team Party postponed due to government shutdown

gettyimages-2238204267.jpg


The Washington Wizards announced to season ticket holders yesterday that the 2025-26 Meet the Team Party was postponed due to the U.S. federal government shutdown. The party was initially scheduled to be on Tuesday, Oct. 7 from 6 to 9 p.m. ET at the Smithsonian National Zoo.

According to the Smithsonian Institution, which operates the National Zoo, all of their attractions will be open through Monday, Oct. 6. Unfortunately, the Meet the Team party was scheduled for Tuesday and it’s unclear whether Congress and the President can agree on a funding bill by then.

The Wizards have regularly hosted this event at Smithsonian facilities. The 2024-25 Meet the Team Party was held at the National Museum of American History from 7 to 10 p.m. ET.

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/comm...-the-team-party-postponed-government-shutdown
 
Wizards sign Leaky Black and Akdolah Gak to Exhibit 10 contracts, waive Jonathan Pierre and Keshon Gilbert

gettyimages-2224789154.jpg


The Washington Wizards have made a couple of moves in their training camp roster this week. On Tuesda,y they signed Akoldah Gak to an Exhibit 10 contract and waived Keshon Gilbert. And yesterday, the Wizards signed Leaky Black to an Exhibit 10 contract while waiving Jonathan Pierre.

Gilbert and Pierre were both signed to Exhibit 10 contracts on Sept.19.

The Washington Wizards have signed F Leaky Black to an Exhibit 10 contract.

In a related move, the team has waived F Jonathan Pierre.

— Wizards PR (@WizPRStats) October 2, 2025
The Washington Wizards have signed F Akoldah Gak to an Exhibit 10 contract.

In a related move, the team has waived G Keshon Gilbert.

— Wizards PR (@WizPRStats) September 30, 2025
The Washington Wizards have made the following roster moves, the team announced today:

• Signed guard Sharife Cooper to a two-way contract

• Signed guard Keshon Gilbert and forward Jonathan Pierre to Exhibit 10 contracts

— Wizards PR (@WizPRStats) September 19, 2025

It may sound counterintuitive to sign a player to an Exhibit 10 one day and then waive him within two weeks. However, Pierre and Gilbert are entering their rookie professional seasons. This indicates that they would likely head to the Capital City Go-Go.This is something that our own Greg Finberg has also indicated.

The Wizards have signed Sharife Cooper to a two-way contract, the team announced.

Cooper was a second-round pick in 2021 out of Auburn and spent three years in the G League.

Washington also signed Keshon Gilbert & Jonathan Pierre to exhibit-10 deals. Both are likely Go-Go guys. pic.twitter.com/2HhX23aahU

— Greg Finberg (@GregFinberg) September 19, 2025

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/late...acts-waive-jonathan-pierre-and-keshon-gilbert
 
Kyshawn George Was Good at AmeriCup, and I’m the Nerd Who Double-Checked

gettyimages-2232349693.jpg

gettyimages-2231861074.jpg

Okay everyone, I got it — Kyshawn George played in the FIBA AmeriCup tournament. He made the all-tournament team, and the consensus view is that he played well.

Regular readers know that at this point, I will uncritically accept the consensus view and look no further. It would be highly unlikely for me to do something rash like pull up stats, crunch some numbers and compare his statistical performance with his competitors. So, just how great will George be? Will he post an all-time great season or merely an epic one?

Editor’s Note: This is the opposite of what Kevin does.

Yeah, I ran some numbers. And, the numbers suggest George was good though not really dominant for Team Canada this summer. This may sound like I want to inspire mass depression, but good is…well…good!

Sure, the level of competition wasn’t elite. There were some good players in the tournament, but AmeriCup was not a place where high level NBA players went to play for their countries — this competition was home to role players and guys who struggled to stick.

I mean, the Team USA roster included someone named Andrew Andrews, which a) sounds like one of the made-up names I used for solo shooting games I played when I was a kid, or b) sounds like someone in witness protection.

I kid — As a senior at University of Washington, Andrews was first team All-Pac-12 and led the conference in scoring. He’s made a living playing in international leagues the past nine years. In 2022, he was MVP of the EuroCup Eight Finals — the first round of the EuroCup playoffs where teams that finished third to sixth place in their regular season play a single-elimination tournament for a spot in the quarterfinals. That’s a pretty good resume.

Anyway, this is not to dismiss what George did. He played well against the competition that was available to him. Which is good!

Let’s talk numbers. Note: PPA (short for Player Production Average) is my all-around production metric. In PPA, average is 100 and higher is better. The sample size is so small (George totaled 155 minutes) that I didn’t apply the usual calculations for role or defensive impact. Also, PPA scores are for this tournament only — they’re a measure of relative dominance in this tournament, this year.

  • USG% — 23.3%
  • ORTG — 115 | tournament average (TA): 104.3 — ortg is short for offensive rating, which is points produced per individual possession x 100
  • eFG% — 63.5% | TA: 50.2%
  • 2pt% — 57.7% | TA: 52.2%
  • 3pt% — 46.2% | TA: 31.6% — 26 total attempts
  • FT% — 78.9% | TA: 71.5%
  • Points — 25.1 (per 48 minutes) | TA: 18.9
  • Rebounds — 7.7 | TA: 8.4
  • Assists — 5.9 | TA: 4.7
  • Steals — 2.2 | TA: 1.8
  • Blocks — 0.9 | TA: 1.1
  • Turnovers — 4.6 | TA: 2.7
  • Fouls — 4.6 | TA: 4.1
  • Ast/tov ratio — 1.3 | TA: 1.7
  • PPA: 148 | TA: 100

Compared to the tournament average, George shot better from everywhere and produced more points, assists and steals. He also committed more turnovers and fouled more. His assists-to-turnover ratio was a subpar 1.3, but his overall offensive efficiency was +11.1 points per 100 possessions relative to the AmeriCup average.

His PPA was 148, which is solidly above average for the tournament. Based on the numbers, I don’t think that merited all-tournament honors, but it’s still good.

Okay, let’s take a look at tournament leaders in various categories — minimum 4 games and 50 minutes played.

Points​

  1. Ismael Romero, Puerto Rico — 31.5
  2. Yago Dos Santos, Brazil — 31.0
  3. Javonte Smart, United States — 30.2
  4. Mfiondu Kabengele, Canada — 29.8
  5. Bruno Caboclo, Brazil — 28.7

Rebounds​

  1. Jack Cooley, United States — 26.2
  2. Arnaldo Toro Barea, Puerto Rico — 18.6
  3. Robert Baker, Jr., United States — 17.6
  4. Charles Bediako, Canada — 16.4
  5. George Conditt IV, Puerto Rico — 15.8

Assists​

  1. Luciano Parodi Gonzalez, Uruguay — 13.9
  2. Bruno Fitipaldo, Uruguay — 13.3
  3. Alexey Thiago Borges, Brazil — 12.1
  4. Andres Feliz, Dominican Republic — 11.4
  5. Yago Dos Santos, Brazil — 10.7

Steals​

  1. Gary Browne, Puerto Rico — 5.3
  2. Romario Roque, Colombia — 4.9
  3. Nicolas Martinez, Uruguay — 4.4
  4. Juani Marcos, Argentina — 4.0
  5. Jassel Perez, Dominican Republic — 3.7

Blocks​

  1. Joel Soriano, Dominican Republic — 5.9
  2. Juan Francisco Fernandez, Argentina — 4.9
  3. Arnaldo Toro Barea, Puerto Rico — 4.0
  4. George Conditt IV, Puerto Rico — 3.7
  5. Robert Baker, Jr., United States — 3.6

Turnovers​

  1. Nicolas Martinez, Uruguay — 6.1
  2. Alex Negrete, Argentina — 5.5
  3. Gary Browne, Puerto Rico — 5.3
  4. Mfiondu Kabengele, Canada — 5.2
  5. Francisco Caffaro, Argentina — 5.2

Assists-to-Turnovers​

  1. Georginho de Paula, Brazil — 20.0 (seriously, 20 assists and 1 turnover)
  2. Andres Feliz, Dominican Republic — 11.0
  3. Cam Reynolds, United States — 9.0
  4. Jerian Grant, United States — 5.8
  5. Kyle Wiltjer, Canada — 5.5

Offensive Rating​

  1. Santiago Vescovi, Uruguay — 155
  2. Ismael Romero, Puerto Rico — 149
  3. Emiliano Serres, Uruguay — 141
  4. Yago Dos Santos, Brazil — 137
  5. Georginho de Paula, Brazil — 133

PPA​

  1. Ismael Romero, Puerto Rico — 287
  2. Kyle Wiltjer, Canada — 222
  3. Yago Dos Santos, Brazil — 219
  4. Santiago Vescovi, Uruguay — 216
  5. Mfiondu Kabengele, Canada — 215

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/wash...t-americup-and-im-the-nerd-who-double-checked
 
The WNBA could have a lockout after the current CBA expires

gettyimages-2234180620.jpg


The Las Vegas Aces and Phoenix Mercury are playing each other in the 2025 WNBA Finals. That series will be the first best-of-seven series in WNBA history, and it will conclude on Oct. 17 if necessary. All games are on ESPN.

However, that is not what most fans of the league are chatting about. It’s about what will happen in 2026, and whether a 2026 WNBA season happens at all. In this season, a new Collective Bargaining Agreement will kick in.

I have written many times that the WNBA is about to enter a brand new era in 2026. Every WNBA player hitting free agency will be up for grabs. It’s an opportunity for teams, including expansion teams like the Toronto Tempo and Portland Fire, to get a head start in the team-building process. Meanwhile, for the Washington Mystics, General Manager Jamila Wideman and Monumental Basketball President Michael Winger think the Mystics are behind the Wizards in their team-building trajectories — even if the Mystics were competitive in the first half of the 2025 WNBA season.

But as basketball fans, I think we agree that it’s not a good thing when there are work stoppages, especially when a league is experiencing growth like the WNBA — even if the Mystics aren’t getting as much of that spotlight as other teams like the Aces and Mercury.

Why will there be a new Collective Bargaining Agreement?


In short, the WNBPA, the WNBA players union, opted out of the current CBA in late Oct. 2024. The original CBA was to expire after the 2026 season. However, the players opted out so the CBA now expires on Oct. 31, 2025.

There are a number of things that players wanted more at the time. They include more pay, standardization of team practice facilities and revenue sharing between players and teams. Those would still be on the table today.

Players also know that the WNBA will get a $2.2 billion media rights deal starting in 2026 which is looped in with the NBA’s new media rights deal which is starting this season. I wrote on the implications this deal would have on the Mystics specifically in this article in 2024, and I wrote another piece touching on the broader themes for all of Monumental Basketball (including the Wizards) here.

WNBA teams will see triple the media revenue of the current deal, and players stand to see some significant pay increases and an improved quality of life. However, players will still try to maximize their leverage wherever possible.

Some of the things that players want more say on is the length of the WNBA season. In 2014, when our site started writing on the Mystics games regularly, there were just 34 regular season games. Starting this season, there are 44. This gives teams more opportunity to make revenue selling tickets and it dilutes salary increases the players have. This is a sticking point, which Raptors HQ’s Chelsea Leite wrote recently.

Also, WNBA team rosters have remained at a maximum of 12 players witih many teams holding just 11 players, the minimum allowed. In fact, team rosters haven’t been bigger than 12 players since the 2008 season. In 2009, the roster size dropped to 11. The current roster limit is now 12, as per the 2014 CBA, but it has remained unchanged since then.

Why are players unhappy with the WNBA leadership?


I could write several long pieces why, but in short, players want to reap the benefits and be seen as partners with team owners for league growth, not as the pawns.

Players unions and the leagues rattle sabers regularly. But in the WNBA semifinals series between the Minnesota Lynx and Phoenix Mercury, the Lynx lost their chance to advance into the WNBA Finals for the second straight year. Lynx Head Coach Cheryl Reeve was fined suspended a game after confronting referees and making rude comments about them. And their star Napheesa Collier made some pretty bold remarks in an exit interview speech below, claiming that WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert, a former women’s college basketball player herself, said that WNBA players should be grateful for their opportunities, among other things.

Napheesa Collier’s full statement today, where she challenged Commissioner Cathy Engelbert and the WNBA with directness and stunning detail we rarely hear from active players. Worth listening to every word. pic.twitter.com/IRTvTc52EA

— Malika Andrews (@malika_andrews) September 30, 2025

Zachary Draves of Swish Appeal, our general WNBA blog, has more of a pointed take on Collier’s remarks. But in short, if Engelbert is saying these things, should she be the Commissioner at all?

What leverage do the players have against the WNBA team owners?​


The number one thing players have against the owners is simple: there are other playing options. During the winter, WNBA players can play overseas where many players make more money than they do at home. This has been a point of frustration for all parties.

But the incentive for American players has gone down in recent years due to existing pay increases AND alternative winter time leagues in the United States, which are also drawing audiences:

  • Athletes Unlimited — This is a oneleague that lasts roughtly one month in February. Players play 5-on-5 but represent themselves in an unique scoring format. the top players get to captain teams and draft teammates. The investors of this league agree to cap their profits while players have more direct say and share in the profits directly.
  • UnrivaledThis is a 3X3 league which lasts from Jan. through Mar. It is founded by Collier and New York Liberty forward Breanna Stewart. A fair number of WNBA players are in this league. And in 2026, Mystics guard Sonia Citron and forward Kiki Iriafen are expected to be here.

Both of these leagues have television rights as well, and this allows WNBA players to make money playing basketball by being investors in the league they play in. So going back to Collier’s statements, keep in mind that she is also a cofounder of Unrivaled. She’ll play one way or another.

What leverage do the WNBA team owners have against the players?


Every negotiation is a two-way street. The owners already own the largest women’s sports league in the United States. The WNBA gets more coverage and air time than any other option. Also, the WNBA is getting a media deal that is multiple times bigger than the still-current one.

Additionally, WNBA team owners benefit from favorable macroeconomic factors and the political environment in the United States. The U.S. economy continued to grow but the labor market is stagnating as a whole, just as negotiations for a new CBA were about to begin. Additionally, with the return of U.S. President Donald Trump, international trade has been impacted by tariffs, threats of additional tariffs, and a decline in net migration (immigrants moving into the U.S.). It’s early to say whether the U.S. economy will be in a recession soon, but the environment doesn’t scream “let’s make this a very worker friendly CBA” either.

That said, I don’t see a lopsided WNBA CBA in favor of the owners because the WNBA’s exposure grew significantly in the 2000s and the economy is not in a recession based on GDP growth. At least not yet.

That said, CBA’s have been negotiated during tough economic times. During the Great Recession of the late 2000s, the WNBA CBA of 2008 wasn’t particularly friendly to players. And the owners did cut the roster size from 13 to 11 the following year due to the economy. Additionally, the 2011 NBA CBA reduced the share of BRI from 57 percent to 50 percent, a deal that followed a lockout and was made during an economic environment in which the U.S. was emerging from the Great Recession.

The WNBA needs players for its next phase of growth. And players need the league, too.


Ultimately, I hope that the 2026 WNBA season begins on time. The league has experienced significant growth since 2020, and teams have benefited from it, gaining more star power and respect. That said, it wouldn’t surprise me to see a lockout that happens for some part of the offseason. It seems like both sides are dug in and a lockout appears possible.

All of that said, the WNBA is the biggest women’s sports league in the U.S. It deserves the big media contract that takes effect next year. And it also deserves to have the best players in the world playing on time next summer.

Hopefully, both sides can reach a fair agreement so fans can continue to watch the league continue to prosper like it has over this past decade.

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/mystics/65461/wnba-lockout-possibilty-2026-washington-mystics
 
Kuzma’s DC Shot Diet: The Numbers vs. Doc Rivers

2066350178.jpg

2179957588.jpg

Sometimes, NBA coaches and executives say weird things, which is what Milwaukee Bucks head coach Doc Rivers just did.

Per Eric Nehm, Bucks beat writers for The Athletic, Rivers had this to say about former Wizards great Kyle Kuzma:

With so much talk about the strength of the Bucks' frontcourt yesterday, I asked Doc Rivers where he thought Kyle Kuzma fit in positionally on this roster and Rivers said 3/4.

Then, Rivers said the following about Kuzma: pic.twitter.com/U5g4W4mfVJ

— Eric Nehm (@eric_nehm) September 30, 2025

Let’s unpack. Saying Kuzma fits as a 3/4 isn’t odd — that’s what Kuzma is. With Milwaukee’s personnel, he probably starts at three with Giannis Antetokounmpo at four and Myles Turner at five. That’s a big front court, which might be good for the Bucks.

The stuff about how Kuzma practiced is normal coach-speak. This seems to be a case of a coach using the media to reinforce how he wants Kuzma to play, which he (or an assistant coach) likely said to Kuzma directly. Normal stuff — praise a guy publicly for doing something the way the coach wants it done.

Edging into the weird was the comment about Bucks defenders being forced to foul him when he “got downhill,” considering that Kuzma has not reliably produced free throws through eight NBA seasons.

The part that struck me as genuinely weird was what Rivers said about Kuzma’s shot profile. Because the numbers show his summary is needlessly wrong.

Now, in Washington (three-and-a-half seasons, not five — but we can forgive him that one), Kuzma, “could literally take any shot,” as Rivers said. And he did. But, Kuzma did not take “a ton of midrange shots.” Not by league standards, and not even by his own.

For his career, according to Basketball-Reference, 14.8% of Kuzma’s field goal attempts were midrangers (two pointers from 10 feet out to the three-point line). In Washington, it was 15.6% of his shot attempts. The league average was about 14% during his time with the Wizards.

So, the “ton” Rivers was referencing is not quite one shot out of every 100 compared to Kuzma’s career average, and about 1.6 shots of every 100 compared to the league.

To be charitable to Rivers, his point is sorta okay with a tweak. During his time in Washington, Kuzma got to the rim a bit less than his career norm — 19.0% of his FGA were at-rim in DC vs. 22.0% for his career. He didn’t trade those at-rim attempts for midrangers, though. He swapped them for floater range shots (3-10 feet).

With the Wizards, floater range attempts were 27.1% of his attempts compared to a career average of 23.0%.

Floater range shots typically come as a result of failed drives — a player trying to get to the rim but being forced by the defense to take a shot from a little further out. Which makes sense if you watched Kuzma with the Wizards. He’d drive and fling up some wild runner if he couldn’t get to the rim.

gettyimages-2212322136.jpg

Wild runners or not, Kuzma was about average at converting those attempts (46.4% when with the Wizards — league average is around 46%), but — to Rivers’ message — those floater range shots are lower-yield shots. Usually. In Kuzma’s case, there’s a caveat.

That’s because Kuzma is a subpar three-point shooter — 33.4% for his career and 33.0% in Washington. His floater range shots produce 0.91 points per shot (using his career conversion rate), and 0.93 (using his conversion rate with the Wizards). His three-point shooting yields 1.00 and 0.99 points per shot.

In other words, Kuzma’s floater range shots are almost as good as his three-point shots at producing points. Add in the effect of drawing fouls and maybe even turnovers and assists, and they probably come out “about the same.”

Now, to extend further charity to Rivers, the numbers do support Kuzma taking even fewer midrange shots. His career percentage on twos from 10+ feet is poor (around 38%), and it was even worse with Washington. Like most players, he’d benefit from taking fewer of them, even though they’ve actually been a small part of his shot diet.

So, why am I picking at Doc Rivers? Because even though there’s a kernel of a point in his comment to reporters, his message and coaching advice would be strengthened by accuracy. The issue with Kuzma’s inefficiency in Washington — and throughout his entire career — is not a result of taking a ton of mid-rangers — because (as the numbers show) Kuzma hasn’t taken “a ton.”

Rather, his inefficiency results from the reality that he’s not a good shooter from anywhere except inside three feet, he commits a lot of turnovers, and he doesn’t get offensive rebounds. There’d be a modest benefit to swapping midrange twos for at-rim attempts, if there was a way to reliably get more at-rim attempts. His NBA coaches haven’t been able to figure out how to do that, even when he shared the floor with LeBron James and Anthony Davis.

Exchanging midrangers for three-point attempts would be somewhat easier, though the boost to offensive efficiency would be small because Kuzma is not a good long-range shooter.

The experiment I’d propose (which may have already been tried by his actual coaches) would be to urge Kuzma to drive frequently and shoot if he can get to the rim or make a safe pass out if he can’t. Have designed safe passes to give him easier reads and help him reduce turnovers. And, I’d ask him to resist taking jumpers from any range outside 10 feet unless it’s a wide-open three or the shot clock is running out.

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/wash...kuzmas-dc-shot-diet-the-numbers-vs-doc-rivers
 
The Wizards are younger but bigger to start the 2025-26 NBA season

Yesterday, the Washington Wizards held Media Day at CareFirst Arena which is adjacaent to the joint Monumnetal Basketball Practice Facility. A lot of the Wizards’ younger players are coming into camp bigger than ever. Literally.

The Young WizKids BULKED UP 💪 (measurements over the last year)

Bub Carrington: 190 LB -> 204
AJ Johnson: 160 -> 174 (+.5 inch)
Alex Sarr: 205 -> 224 🔥🔥
Kyshawn George: 200 -> 209 pic.twitter.com/yXEYjaedMz

— WizardsMuse (@WizardsMuse1) September 29, 2025

As one of the youngest teams in the NBA, this shouldn’t be surprising. With a young roster, players haven’t filled in their frames yet. Some players, most notably Alex Sarr, have shown promise as a shot alterer in 2024-25. Since he has put on 20 pounds since last season, perhaps that will help him build a more physical presence as well.

Source: https://www.bulletsforever.com/quality-shots/65413/washington-wizards-bigger-younger-roster
 
Back
Top