Big 12 Mulling Expansion?

Guardian

Starter
Joined
May 2, 2016
Messages
258
SC
$0.00
PHOENIX -- Big 12 athletic directors and coaches will be presented with data Wednesday that shows a significant increase in the likelihood the league would reach the College Football Playoff if it expands to 12 or more teams.

Analytics from Navigate Research are expected to show the Big 12 has at least a 10-15 percent better chance of reaching the CFP in any given year if it expands as opposed to staying in its 10-team configuration.

That percentage at least doubles than the “4-5 percent” improvement commissioner Bob Bowlsby spoke about in Phoenix on Monday. That smaller figure discussed by Bowlsby only included the addition of a conference championship game, CBS Sports has learned.

The particular analysis used by Navigate for Wednesday's presentation includes expanding the league to 12 with two additional teams, playing an eight-game conference schedule and staging a league championship game. Various expansion candidates were also plugged into simulations Navigate ran 40,000 times.

The most prominent names that continue to be mentioned for expansion include BYU, Central Florida, Cincinnati, UConn, Houston and Memphis.

Navigate is a respected 10-year old Chicago-based firm that has worked with the NFL, Southwest Airlines and several major colleges.

No decision on the future composition of the Big 12 is expected to be made until the league's spring meetings -- May 31 to June 3 in Dallas -- at the earliest.

League coaches and athletic directors are meeting separately this week in Phoenix. Big 12 presidents, who will ultimately make a decision, will be in Dallas later this month.

“The ADs have seen most of it already,” Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said. “The ADs saw the preliminary work of Navigate work in March. It's got a few nuances to it.

“The coaches will be seeing it for the first time.”

One of the scheduling models the ADs have been presented includes a possible 16-team Big 12. Bowlsby called that “mostly an academic [unlikely] undertaking.”

While the new data seems to suggest it would be in the 10-team conference's best interest to expand, one league source called the existing analytics “statistically insignificant.”

If nothing else, expansion would provide a “buffer” of members if schools leave in the future.

“I think the head coaches are kind of concerned because they want what's right for everyone,” Texas coach Charlie Strong said.

There seems to be an issue in even cutting the conference schedule from nine to eight. That move alone would most likely require a renegotiating of the media rights deal with ESPN and Fox, which lasts through the 2024-25 academic year.

One of the original reasons the Big 12 stayed together five years ago during conference realignment was the implementation of a nine-game conference schedule. Adding that extra game provided more inventory (games) for those networks.

Conference games, especially those that include Oklahoma and Texas as the most watched teams, are more profitable than nonconference games.

Adding a fourth nonconference game might also be counterproductive to schedule strength. One Big 12 source said it has become much tougher in general to schedule nonconference “guarantee” games. The source expects that trend to continue as more schools like Idaho drop out of FBS.

Oklahoma AD Joe Castiglione said such a model “would create additional pressure to find a fourth game that would be compelling. The world has changed.”

Bowlsby reiterated that a decision -- whatever it is -- needs to be made this year. The league added West Virginia and TCU to complete its current roster of 10 in 2012.

“The good news is the last time we added members we didn't have the same urgency,” Bowlsby said. “I just think we need to act expediently.”
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...rove-big-12s-playoff-chances-by-10-15-percent
 
To me, the played down reason for wanting an expansion is basically to increase the status of the conference. They basically said the more good teams they have in the league the better chance they have of having a national championship team that comes from their conference. It makes sense, but I think that the politics of leagues does anything good for the sports. They will likely continue to add teams, as they have in the past until they are satisfied that they have enough buzz worthy teams from their league constantly being successful and talked about.
 
Meh. The teams that they are considering adding are mostly in the AAC, which is generally a pretty bad football conference. None of these teams are good all around, with BYU, UCF, and Houston specializing in football and UConn and Memphis being mainly basketball. Honestly, I think if they are looking to expand to 12 they should take Houston and Cincinnati, who are both school with budding potential in football, while Cincy has experience winning basketball as well.
 
Moss44 said:
Meh. The teams that they are considering adding are mostly in the AAC, which is generally a pretty bad football conference. None of these teams are good all around, with BYU, UCF, and Houston specializing in football and UConn and Memphis being mainly basketball. Honestly, I think if they are looking to expand to 12 they should take Houston and Cincinnati, who are both school with budding potential in football, while Cincy has experience winning basketball as well.

I'm really not a fan of all the expansion that is going on in college sports. To me it's watering down the product and making it not as good. ACC basketball used to be truly special with a lot of intimate rivalries when it was just 9 teams. Now it's this mega conference with a lot of teams and it's not as special to the long term fans of the conference. Granted it's still pretty darn good and exciting. But it's lost something special. I think that does for the other conferences that have expanded as well and it's why I'm opposed to expansion in general.
 
Yeah, I guess I can't have much of an option on it though because my favorite team, Penn State, is one of the more recent members of the Big Ten!
 
I really wish they would stay geographically focused. Trying to grab teams halfway across the country is insane. It only makes sense for football, and screws over the other sports.

I was a proponent of the Big 12 collapsing and other conferences picking up the pieces. I still wouldn't mind seeing it.
 
Back
Top